What Are Dictators Are The Most Effective Form Of Government?

Improved Essays
Position Paper The author in the source is making a statement on how dictatorships are the most effective form of government. The statement makes arguments only for the practical side of a dictatorship, whilst conveniently ignoring how a dictatorship can be damaging to a country and its citizens. When a country is run by a dictatorship it’s people's voices are ignored as well as their rights and freedoms to further the ideologies of a single individual who runs said country. Dictators are known to use drastic measures to obtain and stay in power including the use of force, indoctrination, control of external and internal media, propaganda and the manipulation of their democracies. These tactics are often enforced with the fear of exile, imprisonment

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    The leaders usually abuse the powers and privileges given to them and thus according to him, democracy is undesirable in many ways. He explains that many democracies seem to function well but in the real sense the people are being deceived in several ways that there is always the need to be skeptic and evaluate the government of the day in a more subjective manner. These are very important aspects of democracy because if there is a check and balance system which is often provided by the media, then democracy would function well (Heidegger, 2002). Herman and Chomsky explain that the media should be used to check the government of the day that is owned by the powerful people in the government. This leads to news being tilted towards the view that the government is good and when the government has done something wrong, it is not relayed to the people for fear of an…

    • 1451 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    In a dictatorship the person in charge of the country can develop become power hungry or developed a god…

    • 2109 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Thus, individuals conform due to threats imposed upon them by authority figures (Delamater & Meyers, 2010: 198). Non-conformity is discouraged in this example, since if one decides to reject the rules imposed upon them, they are subject to harsh forms of punishment such as…

    • 1350 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fahrenheit 451 And Saudi Arabia Comparison Essay “Of all dictatorships a dictatorship sincerely exercised for the good of it’s people may be the most oppressive.” This quote talks about how the more tyrannical a dictatorship gets, the more strict rules and harsh consequences will be implemented to the people of their country. In Saudi Arabia, the people are living in a dystopian society as rules have harsh consequences, censorship of the internet, and the fear of ISIL. In Fahrenheit 451, people are living in a utopia which turns out to be a dystopia as technology takes care of people problem’s but in return take their humanity away from them, with the censorship of knowledge, and the fear of the hound.…

    • 1566 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Dictatorship is defined as form of government in which one person or a small group possesses absolute power without effective constitutional limitations. While the United States is known as a democracy and was founded on the beliefs of a democracy, in recent years many people have begun to compare America's government to that of a dictatorship. The use of executive orders is one way that this can be explained. An executive order is a rule or order issued by the president to an executive branch of the government and having the force of law. An executive order can be implemented with out congressional oversight.…

    • 201 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In many dystopian societies, such as the society in Ayn Rand's Anthem, children are taken from their parents at an early age. This usually is because in dystopian and totalitarian governments, the leaders want all control. To understand this you have to take a deeper meaning on the word totalitarian and what kind of government it is. Totalitarian itself means “exercising complete control over all aspects of life including freedom, will, and thoughts”, so therefore a totalitarian government is one where the government takes all control over the aspects of its people's everyday life, quickly smothering any and all opposition. So if the government takes the children from them right out of the womb, the government has full control over what the child learns and how the child grows to behave.…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Federalists and Anti-Fedarlists of the 1780s, were not the first political parties in The United States, but were political factions created to achieve a short term goal. The Federalists were primarily wealthy conservatives from cities and the East Coast. They supported ratification of the Constitution, and a strong central government. The Anti-federalists were composed of working class, poor, rural people, that opposed ratification. They were in favor of a weaker central government that allowed local government to hold more power.…

    • 939 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Giver Tyranny Essay

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Both aspects are crucial but in this case tyranny seems to be more dominating as having a nonfunctioning government is useless in front of a tyranny. “democracy and majority rule confer as an aura of legitimacy and respectability on acts that would otherwise be deemed tyrannical” the book well defines and shows a form of tyranny which had been modified to give the citizens whatever they needed to sustain and had close boundaries which would make one feel like sitting in a cardboard…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tyranny Of Experts

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In 2014, William Easterly released a book, The Tyranny of Experts, arguing his case that attempting to solve poverty in third world countries without providing the political infrastructure to sustain long term growth is a lost cause. Ignoring the idea that freedom and human rights are what have generated much of the growth in the west, third world experts’ “blank-slate” mentality fails to utilize history to the advantage of poorer nations. Easterly further argues that so-called development experts place their focus on nations rather than people when trying to alleviate poverty, and in the process trample rights of individuals. Continuing his critique, Easterly asserts that the overall manipulation of economies through conscious effort disables…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fahrenheit 451 Comparison

    • 1562 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Fahrenheit 451 And Saudi Arabia Comparison Essay “Of all dictatorships, a dictatorship sincerely exercised for the good of its people may be the most oppressive.” This quote talks about how the more tyrannical a dictatorship gets, the more strict rules and harsh consequences will be implemented to the people of their country. In Saudi Arabia, the people are living in a dystopian society as rules have harsh consequences, censorship of the internet, and the fear of ISIS. In Fahrenheit 451, people are living in a utopia which turns out to be a dystopia as technology takes care of people problem’s but in return take their humanity away from them, with the censorship of knowledge, and the fear of the hound.…

    • 1562 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since the government was completely controlling the people, the author is trying to showing us that everyone has their own sense of power and it should not be abused or taken by anyone. Giving the people a say and a voice is essential in order to prevent any major conflict that could lead to war or…

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If this is true then democracy is seen to be taking action because people are able to show their disapproval without fear of being violently oppressed, and their voices are strong enough that the incumbent listens. It is also suggesting that the Constitution is more important than a violent overturn to stay in power, which is important because some of the exclusive executive power is beginning to be shifted away and into the law which is necessary. Although, some politicians are able to amend the Constitution whether that be most likely because…

    • 1784 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On July 19th 1979 Saddam Hussein began his dictatorship in Iraq and from that day on history was changed. Iraq was in the middle of a religious war between the Sunni’s and the Shi’ites. Sunni’s and Shi’ites continue to have the disagreement about something that happened 1400 years ago after the death of prophet Muhammad. Shi’ites believe that in order to rule you have to be a descendent of Muhammad. Mean while the Sunnis believe otherwise.…

    • 1522 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Some people think that Direct Democracy and Dictatorship do not have anything in common but in the contrary they do, not a lot however they do. Direct Democracy and Dictatorship are very different types of governments and people say that they don’t have anything in common but they do. Both governments do their jobs in very different ways although they are told that Direct Democracy is way better than Dictatorship and it’s true in my opinion they have a lot in common and also a lot of differences. A dictatorship is one of the strictest governments in the world.…

    • 1227 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Party slogan “Ignorance is strength” is The Party’s mechanism of having people simultaneously believe in two contradictory beliefs , which serves as an advantage to The Party and a disadvantage to citizens of Oceania. Through this contradictory party slogan, The Party has full control over Oceana by having information concealed so that people do not have enough intelligence to overthrow The Party. Moreover, the more ignorant the citizens of Oceania are the less likely they will rebel against The Party because there is not enough information known about The Party to do so. In order to rebel against The Party, citizens must have the conscious of rebelling against the government. In the words of Orwell, “Until they have become conscious they will not rebel and until after they have rebelled they cannot be conscious,”( Orwell 61).…

    • 988 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays