Christian And Muslim Perspectives: The Crusades

Decent Essays
The Crusades was a gory period in history where the Christians and Muslims had their own differences, which brought them into conflict and leading to a couple million deaths. Both sides had their own perspectives that the other would not agree on. I will be explaining the Western and Eastern Christian and Muslim’s perspectives and how it brought them to war. First I will be going over a summary of this time period so one can feel empathy and understand why things happened the way they did. Pope Urban II launched the first crusade in 1095. He wanted to pilgrimage to the East with armed pilgrims and knights. He told everyone that Jesus was the leader and not to fight with fellow Christians, but unite and push Muslim territory back (Historical …show more content…
Greek Historian Niketas Choniatēs had firsthand experience to the religious zeal and prejudice of the Roman Empire (O City Pg. 224). The crusaders broke through the city’s walls and killed every age and sex by sword while setting the city on fire (O City Pg. 225). Niketas stated, “how horrible it was to see the divine body and blood of Christ poured out and thrown to the ground.” He went on to describe the destruction of the religious property at Hagia Sophia, which underlines the crusaders incentive, which is the difference in religion (O City Pg. 226). The barbarians would not listen to anything that anyone would have to say. If someone spoke freely they were rebuked and would have had a sword drawn onto them or having a small difference in opinion (O City Pg. 227). Niketa’s experience shows how brutal and wicked these “religious” people were. They killed anyone impetuously regardless of sex or age and destroyed everything that they came across only because small differences in religion? The Byzantines looked at these crusaders as savages and barbarians and were very furious about their actions wanting to seek …show more content…
The Western Christians believed in fighting and conquering Jerusalem for God. The Eastern Christians believed that they were barbaric and wicked for killing without thought over small differences in religion. The Muslims believed that they were being treated unfair because of the disrespect of the invasion of their own territory. Muslims believed that they were more passionate about God than any other religion. They did not want Christians teaching the book of Quran to their children because they would misinterpret it. All three of these types of people were all stereotypical and ethnocentric. They did not fully understand the other religion and believed that their religion is the best religion causing millions of deaths between the 11th and 16th

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Causes Of The Crusades

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages

    It was much more than just the fight over control of the Holy Land; other reasons included taking back control of other Christian lands, protecting the churches power, the feudal instinct to fight, and gaining political or territorial advantage. There were various motivations that sparked the beginning and continuation of the Crusades. For Christians, a pilgrimage to the Holy City of Jerusalem was a great religious undertaking. When Jerusalem fell under new control in the eleventh century, about 3000 Christian pilgrims were persecuted and killed. This prompted Christians to take an even more pious journey to rescue this scared spot.…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    So they had to seek revenge for the horrible deeds Muslims had done against them . Alexius Emperor of Byzantium who was an Christian ally, thought the Crusade started because of a cunning plan by Peter Hermit. Peter the Hermit had tried to travel to Jerusalem but he was attacked by the Seljuk Turks, so since he did not want to go on the journey alone due to safety he made a plan. He went around these Christian countries telling them that God told him that they needed to get Jerusalem from the hands of the Muslims. Peter did not listen to his Emperor and followed with his plan, and brought trouble for Christians ( Comnena 366- 370 ).…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In 1187, Saladin the Great who was the general of Tikrit led the Muslim’s army and reconquered Jerusalem from the Crusade. Crusade was not simply religious journey of the Christian to Jerusalem. The event created a hostile relationship between the Muslim and the Christian lasting to this day. After the Crusade occurred, the Christian pilgrims needed to be protected and it led to the founding of the Knights Templar. It was also the futile war because thousands of people died due to their religious belief.…

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Because their theologies were so different, they typically didn’t agree on much. However, they all agreed that Jesus was the enemy. They said that Jesus was a blasphemer because He called Himself the Son of God. They said He was irreverent because He told them that they were wrong in the way they acted and treated the people. These leaders were afraid of losing their following because Jesus was becoming more popular than them.…

    • 4623 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    One of the primary reasons for the proclaiming of the Crusades was to cut down the power of the Seljuks, who were a threat to the Byzantine Empire, and also the safety of Christians on all areas that they conquered, which included the holy city of Jerusalem. At the Council of Clermont the Pope said of the Turks: “They have killed and captured many, and have destroyed the churches and devastated the empire. If you permit them to continue thus for awhile with impurity, the faithful of God will be much more widely attacked by them.” The Crusades were an opportunity for people to make a name for themselves, and amass wealth, power, and glory. This was especially attractive towards second or third sons of nobles that wouldn’t inherit their father’s titles. Some of the first secular leaders to join up on the 1st Crusade were not kings, but counts and dukes.…

    • 1844 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    First, I will explain how I know that the Muslims and the Christians are not friendly to each other. They both have their like in different gods.Document 6 states that the fourth crusade didn't do nothing to gain anything but cause destruction leading the Christians to dislike the Muslims more.This is important because if the crusades had not begun the Christians and the Muslims would of had a better relationship. Document 6 also states that many lives where token or lost from the fourth crusade. This is relevant because the fourth crusade was more different from the other crusades by being more brutal.This is one of the biggest reasons the crusades is negative.…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    They are clearly an unstable society with no real morals and Hawthorne hated this about them. So, he wrote the Scarlet Letter and filled it with irony to specifically criticize the puritan ideals. The puritans believed that Dimmesdale was their holy pastor, yet he was ironically one of the biggest sinners in their colony. They also believed that sin should be publically shamed, but ironically only in Hester because they are all sinners secretly 1124124at heart. This is the world where everybody is fake, everybody wears a mask.…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    It was on this day that pagans hoped to terminate Christianity. These pagans were under direct orders of Emporer Diocletian, who stated that they were to go to the town of Nicomedia and light all of the sacred Christian texts on fire and burn down the entire building. Then he perceeded to have the Pagans destroy all other Christian sacred buildings in the area and persecute any Christian who tried to stop them ("The Tenth Persecution, Under Diocletian, A.D. 303 - Bible Study Tools"). Christians who were captured by the Pagans were ¨...arrested, tortured, and burned alive¨ ("The Tenth Persecution, Under Diocletian, A.D. 303 - Bible Study Tools"). One of the most horrific punishments enflicted on them was death by drowning.…

    • 1125 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The letters that were passed showed confusion in one of the Emperors men on how to handle the people who claimed the Christianity or those who didn’t claim it. It ended up having those who were Christian would be executed and those who followed the teachings of their gods would have nothing done to them. The Islamic faith per the Quran the non-believers (In this case Christians) are incorrect in their beliefs because they are corrupt in the way they teach. Both ways of teaching could involve the death of Christian believers but, they both have the Christians killed because the beliefs of Christian faith are a harm to the established religion. The two different stories differ in that there was more political influence in the Roman setting because of the actual power that their government held rather than the Sharia law which is a basic set of laws that doesn’t have a face behind…

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    If the tribulations were brought from God to punish humans like Waknuk believes; God would certainly punish them for their monstrous decisions. They banish and kill people for having the slightest difference from a normal human being. How would they think that’s considered good in God’s eyes? They fear God because he may punish them by bringing another Tribulation, but they don’t realize that the segregation of anyone who doesn’t have “five fingers on each hand” or “two legs,” is against the Bible point completely. They have misinterpreted The Bible so that they can get away with being arrogant and blatantly racist.…

    • 1287 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays