Welfare State In John Rawls's Theory Of Social Justice

Improved Essays
Abstract
John Rawls in his work “Theory of Justice” explains that in order to have complete social justice in society we need a state which does no discrimination and provides some basic standard of living and looks after those who don’t have the sufficient means to support themselves. In his work Rawls has supported the idea that the state should provide the basic standard of living to all.

Introduction
Welfare state is a concept of state in which the government takes an active role in protecting and developing the economic and socio- economic rights of the citizens. It is based on the principles of equality of opportunity, equitable distribution of wealth, and public responsibility for those unable to avail themselves of the minimal provisions for a good life . Welfare state aims to provide protection to those weaker section of the society. The theory of welfare state can be interpreted as:
• State trying to provide a basic
…show more content…
Rawls in his works shows that for creating justice in the society welfare state is required to be in function as there are certain conditions which is needed to be fulfilled such as equal socio economic rights, equality and so on. Rawls never explicitly justifies welfare state nor did he spoke about welfare state for that matter but he always supported the institution of welfare state to create justice in the society. It’s in his theory of justice only that we see his support for welfare state. In his second theory of justice we see Rawls supporting the basic elements of welfare state. In his second theory Rawls talks about creating equal socio economic rights in the economy for having justice. He says that each and every person should be provided with a basic standard of living which is to be maintained by the state for all its citizens. Rawls never talked about welfare state being an important aspect but just as a stepping stone to achieving social

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Now that the objection of self-interest has been refuted, the emphasis needs to shift towards an explanation of Rawls second principle of justice. The second principle, commonly referred to as the “Difference Principle,” indicates that, “[S]ocial and economic inequalities are to be arranged so that they are both (a) reasonably expected to be to everyone’s advantage, and (b) attached to positions and offices open to all.” Rawls specifies that the “Liberty Principle” is “lexicographical”. This means that the principles are hierarchically ordered where the first principle must be satisfied before the second can even be considered.…

    • 1606 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Marx, Karl. “After the Revolution.” In Princeton Readings in Political Thought. Edited by Mitchell Cohen and Nicole Fermon. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996.…

    • 1317 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Rawls looks at what the proper role of government should be and he begins with the idea that there are primary goods, which include both material goods and goods of rights or opportunities. It is societies job to figure out how to help us cooperate to distribute those goods in a just way. Rawls does not claim that those goods must be distributed equally, unlike Marx, Rawls is advocating for a welfare state not a communist state. Rawls separates the distribution of material goods and rights, and determines that there are certain rights that must be…

    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He argues that a person's liberty is what is most important and should be a priority. The second principle is called the “Difference Principle” which requires social and economic inequalities to be modified so that they can produce an outcome that is fair and equal to all. Rawls’ notion of justice as fairness demands that distribution of the goods of society should be consciously structured in order to provide a fair distribution. His last argument ensures that no one is advantaged or disadvantaged in society, this is called the social contract theory. The “original position” is the main component on Rawls’ social contract account of justice, it allows us to figure out what principle of justice people in society would agree to if we lived in a society of total freedom.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This principle dealt with people’s liberty. These liberties were entitled to everyone and always remained. He believed basic liberties can be limited but, that only meant for the sake of liberty. To avoid harming the liberties of others. Rawls, second principle states “social and economic inequalities are to be arranged so . . .…

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Universal Health Care

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The argument against this is that America was based on the principle of negative rights on non-interference. This ideology suggests that the United States promotes a life-long dependency on government. Under this system money is essentially transferred from the hardworking taxpayer to government dependent individuals. Philosopher John Rawls believes that justice requires universal medical coverage and that minimal health care is a right. He argues that justice applies to the basic fabric of society, and health care is an essential part of that structure.…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Mass incarceration also creates a social hierarchy with Blacks being at the bottom because of being labeled a drug addict/user and a criminal, which in Rawls’ perspective is an injustice because its placing certain individuals higher than others. Rawls would view the situation the same as he viewed distribution of wealth and income, except the moral inquiry would now be the distribution of a negative good which would be punishment among individuals pertaining particularly to certain racial groups. Therefore, if Rawls proposed a solution, it would be that although there would still be some type of punishment institution to house those who are a severe threat to the community in order to protect society, we would choose arrangements that would respect the humanity of each individual. Also he would also examine the “social division of responsibility” between society and individuals. For example when we are about to arrest or convict an individual for possessing or deal drugs, one must also consider everything to ensure that each individual continues to face a decent opportunity for a good life.…

    • 1515 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although his critique of mass incarceration maybe harsh under several of his principles the problem can be fixed. Rawls suggestion is that you imagine yourself in an original position in society under a veil of ignorance. Being behind the veil means that you do not know anything about yourself and your natural abilities. You also are unaware of your race, sex, nationality, and talents. In other words, you are being born into the world blind to everything.…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Because a single payer system pays for those people who aren’t working and can’t afford to pay in, the rest of working society pays the bill for those people. So what would Rawls believe? He would be for a single payer healthcare system. This is because he believes in equality for all. Using the initial situation…

    • 1856 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I am here to discuss the reasons why the individual would choose to pick life without possibility of parole in the case of a robber killing a store owner and being charged with 2nd degree murder. With the case of the individual jury person one of the things about him is that one of his children is in law enforcement, this little amount of evidence shows why he would choose life without parole is because he respects the law and the punishment of the judicial system, defendant shown as a threat to society and he had a weapon. After the veil of ignorance the position is still the same because we believe that the defendant will be a danger to society and needs to be locked up from the public.…

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1 ANCIENT ROME The history of Ancient Rome is divided into "three broad categories: the kingdom of Rome (beginning in the 8th century B.C.), the period of the Republic (beginning in 509 BC) and the period of the Empire (beginning in 27 BC)." There was the expansion of Rome, and politics was a game for the wealthy political families. There have been different views about this Roman era and what constitutes "good society?" It is the hope that this essay will allow the reader clarity and understanding this time in history. 2 Amitai Etzioni defines community as a "combination of two elements: A) a web of affect-laden relationships among a group of individuals, relationships; B) A measure of commitment to a set of shared values, norms,…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As I stated above, Rawls indicated that everyone be given equal rights no matter the circumstances. He also implied, that the disadvantage should be given a chance to improve, and I couldn’t agree more. If people aren’t given a chance how are they supposed to improve in…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Using the first principle of justice, the laws that are based off the “general will” will always promote the security and freedom of individuals intact. Due to the emphasis on promoting freedom and equality, the ideal society would fall under Rawls’ determination of fairness under the first principle of justice. Rawls puts an emphasis on equal liberties and Rousseau’s society is focused on equality of all individuals. In that society, individuals have social liberties similar to those Rawls emphasizes. “The social compact creates an equality among the citizens so that they all commit to the same conditions and should all have the same rights.”…

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This allows no one person to be advantaged or disadvantaged. Therefore, the less fortunate would have the same chance as someone that is more fortunate. John Rawls thought that the first virtue of social institutions should be justice. He developed two principles to apply to situations to say if they were just or unjust. This theory applies to this case because the only reason that the judge is even considering sterilizing Sally is for the reason that she is disabled.…

    • 1285 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Rawls holds the belief that people are allowed to keep all they acquire fairly, up to a certain point. That it can not be acquired if it “jeopardizes fair opportunity”, and an individual cannot “enjoy having more than others unless it....benefits the worst off group”12 This is compared to Nozick who holds steadfast in his belief that individuals are entitled to all they have acquired fairly, and that for the state to interfere would be to deny that they themselves are an individual with rights. This absolute ideology is discussed in detail by Michael J. Sandel in Liberalism and the Limits of Justice13, where he expresses that Nozick does not explain his beliefs on possession entirely, saying “Nozick is prepared to accept that people may not deserve their natural assets, but claims they are entitled to them nonetheless”, but does not show why this is so. 14 Sandels point displays a problem with Nozicks priority on the rights to property and his absolutism. The issue is that he does not advocate for what could be a functional society, in which a fair redistribution of all rewards and resources is required, for example in the communitarian sense.…

    • 1849 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays