Arguments Against Welfare Drug Testing

Improved Essays
Welfare Drug Testing: A Violation of Privacy? Welfare was implemented to help struggling people afford food and other needs. It has been one of the most debated topics of all time. Those who are against the drug testing of welfare recipients point out that in the state of Utah, where drug testing potential recipients has been mandated, only 12 people tested positive in a whole year. Those who are for the drug testing, point to the fact that the state of Utah saved over $350,000 dollars in the first year. The opposition is one of the more appealing arguments to me.
Millions of people receive welfare from the government. Many use the financial help to buy groceries and other essentials for their family. Some people use the money to buy illegal
…show more content…
It was brought into place during the Great Depression of the 1930’s, a countrywide economic downturn. The Depression left many people in poverty and needing help. Congress passed the Social Security Act in 1935. The Social Security Act is a program that hands out pensions to the elderly and unemployed. In 1964, Congress passed the Food Stamp Act, which helped the unemployed and poor buy groceries. The Food Stamps Act was renamed SNAP, Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program in 2008. Food stamps help an estimated 50 million Americans. Many of the people who opposed the new act said that it encourages dependency of recipients. The supporters of the act argued that it helped those in need and that it would help drive the unemployed to find jobs. Supporters of drug testing for welfare have pointed out, “We don 't want parents on welfare using their money for drugs. Although drug abuse by anyone can endanger life and livelihoods, drug abuse by mothers and fathers may endanger their children. Who is caring for the kids when adults are under the influence” (Bodie). So in conclusion, drug testing welfare recipients has proven to be a waste of money and valuable time of the workers who have to administer these tests. They have yet to prove that they are worth the time and effort put into administering these tests. They have yet to prevent the purchase of illegal drugs with welfare money. They exclude those who need the welfare money for groceries and other essentials but also have a history or current drug issue. This kind of exclusion is unnecessary and a violation of these peoples rights and

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    “The use of food stamps increased to sixteen percent or 13,600,000 people in the year 2010 alone”(Gundersen). “forty one percent of food assistance people haven't even finished high school (30 HOUR FAMINE TEAM). Nearly half of the member in the SNAP are kids but still “16,000,000 kids in america aren't getting the food they need ("11 Facts About Hunger in the US.”). The financial instability of the Americans is causing a large number of citizens to go with out the food need to be healthy. “The district of columbia or the United States nation's capital has the highest rate of the…

    • 2628 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Major Food Corporations

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages

    [1] The United States created “legislation in 1933” to make sure family framers had jobs to help feed America. [2] The farmers prospered up until the government begun to fund corporations. Americans lost jobs due to the oversized companies and continue to do so. Many fell into debt and others…

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This may even cause people to be able to get a job if they got clean to pass the welfare drug test (Grovum). Opposition came up with a great point about children. People opposed to drug testing say that it may put vulnerable children at risk, if government aid was taken away from their parents. They say that if the benefits were taken away then the parents could not supply their children, food, housing, and clothing (Lewis, and Kenefick). But it should be pointed out that the only people who would lose benefits would be people who fail the drug tests.…

    • 1627 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is why drug testing must be enforced. The government believes that abusing welfare happened because the applicants are too lazy to go out and look for a job. Another reason would be that they did not pass the required drug test therefore they did not get hired. When a person who does drugs does not have money they will do anything to get a hold of drugs. With that being said, they have abused welfare checks and any other assistants from the…

    • 1532 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It is only fair that people receiving welfare should have the same procedures to receive money. “Critics have argued that mandatory drug testing is an unfair attack on the poor, but the most compelling reason to require it is to truly help those affected” (Vitter). Drug testing is seen as a harmful act by many citizens that receive welfare, but it should not be a problem for people receiving welfare money, if they are not using drugs. People are so angered by this becoming a policy, because they know that they will have to stop using in order to still receive…

    • 1791 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is not fair for the people that really are in need and do not spend their money on drugs. If the states started drug testing welfare applicants, more money would be given to people who really are in need of money and use their money for the things they truly need. Welfare applicants should be drug tested before receiving their money; Giving irresponsible persons welfare may lead to our tax money being wasted, separation of families, and more drug addiction. Many Americans are complaining about their tax money being given to possible drug users and their money-that they work hard for-being wasted. Many Americans were unhappy with the welfare system, claiming that individuals were abusing the welfare program by not applying for jobs, having more children just to get more aid, and staying unmarried so as to qualify for greater benefits (US Welfare System 1).…

    • 1035 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the United States, 40 percent of all food is uneaten (B). This amounts to about 197.7 billion dollars spent every year on food that is never eaten (B). That is an incredible amount of money that could be used on other things like funding education or researching cures for disease. The majority of food that is wasted is wasted at the consumer level. Consumers are responsible for wasting twenty one percent of all food produced while ten percent of all food produced is wasted by farms and retailers.…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Adoption

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Another problem is the fact that many people foster children or teenagers only for the money. They have no intention of actually helping or providing a healthy home for them. To counter this argument roughly 130,000 kids are adopted annually in America. Since 2000 there has been a 6% increased rate until 2008. According to the Dave Thomas Foundation, “Nearly 40 percent of American adults, or 81.5 million people, have considered adopting a child.” That is almost half of the American adult population or 81.5 million families willing to adopt.…

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    America has always dealt with the issue of poverty. During the Great Depression, many programs were made to provide assistance to the poor. The Works Progress Administration put millions of people to work. Also, Congress passed the Social Security Act, establishing a tax to provide benefits for people in need (Axelrod-Contrada,2010). In the course of four decades, the War on Poverty created programs such as Head Start, food stamps, Medicare, and Medicaid, all of which still provide benefits to the poor today.…

    • 1624 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Great Depression’s consequences are somewhat like those of the Great Recession’s considering bank failures and unemployment but at a much devastating scale. When World War II ended, the Great Depression’s unemployment rate fell below ten percent. Franklin D. Roosevelt’s “New Deal” was programs and policies “meant” to improve conditions for the people’s suffering. The Great Recession’s federal reserve lowered interest rates in 2008 and later adopted the zero-interest rate policy. Tax rebates were mailed to middle and lower class households to promote spending.…

    • 1762 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays