Nietzsche perspective on contract and punishment is more compelling to me than the other thinkers. I also think that Nietzsche and Marx are overlapping in some areas, and also Marx and Weber.
Nietzsche perspective sounds compelling to me, because he is explaining the moral words we are using based on its origin. We use moral concepts the way how it has been used a long time ago, and we use those concepts based on its history “, the moral conceptual world of ‘debt’, ‘conscience’, ‘duty’, ‘sacred duty’, has its breeding ground – all began with a thorough and prolonged bloodletting, like the beginning of all great things on earth” (41). The words get it is meaning from the way that it has been used. He also describes forgetfulness a positive and …show more content…
Bad conscience started with people feeling depends toward the leader of their clan, with beginning of religion the felt independent toward their god. Bad conciseness is a sickness and we should be powerful to overcome our bad conciseness “bad conciseness is a sickness, there is no point in denying it “(60). Marx and Weber both are rationalists. they both agree that religion has a role in arising capitalism, but they disagree about the use of that role. For Marx, religion is a method used for spreading capitalism. While, for Weber religion can be used to understand the capitalism. They also agreed that the class struggle is an important factor in understanding the rise of capitalism. While, Marx and Nietzsche are both considered freedom as the highest goal that the person should work to achieve. But they disagreed about the goal for Marx, freedom is to get rid of all the inequality form like the slavery and the capitalism. Freedom for Nietzsche is the individual ability to control their life and their future; without being limited by the morality “But what a lot of preconditions there are for this! In order to have that degree of control over the future, man must first have learnt to distinguish between what happens by accident and what by design, to think causally, to view the future as the present and anticipate it”
Nietzsche perspective sounds compelling to me, because he is explaining the moral words we are using based on its origin. We use moral concepts the way how it has been used a long time ago, and we use those concepts based on its history “, the moral conceptual world of ‘debt’, ‘conscience’, ‘duty’, ‘sacred duty’, has its breeding ground – all began with a thorough and prolonged bloodletting, like the beginning of all great things on earth” (41). The words get it is meaning from the way that it has been used. He also describes forgetfulness a positive and …show more content…
Bad conscience started with people feeling depends toward the leader of their clan, with beginning of religion the felt independent toward their god. Bad conciseness is a sickness and we should be powerful to overcome our bad conciseness “bad conciseness is a sickness, there is no point in denying it “(60). Marx and Weber both are rationalists. they both agree that religion has a role in arising capitalism, but they disagree about the use of that role. For Marx, religion is a method used for spreading capitalism. While, for Weber religion can be used to understand the capitalism. They also agreed that the class struggle is an important factor in understanding the rise of capitalism. While, Marx and Nietzsche are both considered freedom as the highest goal that the person should work to achieve. But they disagreed about the goal for Marx, freedom is to get rid of all the inequality form like the slavery and the capitalism. Freedom for Nietzsche is the individual ability to control their life and their future; without being limited by the morality “But what a lot of preconditions there are for this! In order to have that degree of control over the future, man must first have learnt to distinguish between what happens by accident and what by design, to think causally, to view the future as the present and anticipate it”