Webb V City Of Philadelphia Summary

Decent Essays
Yes Webb v. City of Philadelphia came out right to me. The case result came from the Utilitarianism lens; the right way to behave in a given situation is to choose the alternative that is likely to produce the greatest overall good (Textbook, page 16), so not letting Webb wear her religious garb on the job would have less consequences for the Police department. In the City’s view, at stake is the police department’s impartiality, or more precisely, perception of its impartiality by the citizens of all races, and religions whom the police are charged to serve and protect (Textbook page 143).
I think the case would have come out differently under the Virtue Ethics. Aristotle argued that people develop their moral abilities, called virtues, through

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    SCOTT V. CARPANZANO United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit, 556 Fed. Appx 288 (2014) FACTS: Rick Scott deposited $2 million in an escrow account into Salvatore Carpanzano’s company. Because of his violation of the escrow agreement, his funds were withdrawn. Scott was not able to recover his money so filed a suit Salvatore Carpanzano, which included his daughter Carmela Carpanzano. Scott did not make any allegations on Carmela’s part.…

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Dorrough V. Wilkes (2002)

    • 1733 Words
    • 7 Pages

    NUR 714 Legal Case Study Analysis Paper Dorrough v. Wilkes (2002) No 2001-CA-00117-SCT Jonathan R. Heshler California University of Pennsylvania NUR 714 Legal Case Study Analysis The purpose of this paper is to analyze and review the case of Dorrough v. Wilkes (2002). This civil case involved a female patient (Gwendolyn Wilkes) presenting to the emergency room at Boliver County Hospital, being misdiagnosed and discharged by Dr. Dorrough, dying the next day at another hospital after emergency surgery and the patients husband and son bringing a wrongful death medical malpractice action suit forth.…

    • 1733 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the court case Garrity Vs New Jersey the officer on trial was made to incriminate himself by being forced to testify. This officer was later convicted on his testimony. The supreme court hailed that the officers answers could not be used against him in his criminal trial because the fifth amendment forbid a coerced confession. Today the Garrity rule states if an officer is compelled to provide self incriminating statements information or statements such statements can not be used in a criminal proceeding, but officers can be disciplined or discharged.…

    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Blake V. Ferguson Case

    • 101 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Whether the trial court erred when it denied Mr. Blake's motion to suppress, because the pretrial identification procedure was so impermissible suggestive that there is a substantial likelihood of irreparable misidentification. Whether the trial court erred when it overruled Mr. Blake's objection to Ms. Olsen's and Mr. Klein's in-court identification of him, because it was tainted by the improper pretrial identification and inherently incredible. II. ISSUE II Did the lower tribunal violated the constitutional rights of Mr. Blake and the jurors because the court erred in allowing the State Attorney to raise discriminatory peremptory challenge based on racial and gender grounds?…

    • 101 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The People v. Smith case was decided in 1991 by the Supreme Court of Michigan. The issue was that a defendant, Ricky Franklin Smith, argued he should be resentenced because of the inclusion of the presentence investigation report of his previously expunged juvenile record (People, 1991). The Court of Appeals in Michigan agreed with the defendant and required that Smith be sentenced again. The Supreme Court, however, heard the case and reverse the decision stating the Smith did not need to be sentenced again on the basis of the inclusion of his juvenile record alone. Smith was originally convicted of breaking and entering, largely based upon his decision to plead guilty.…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the Morgan V Virginia case Irene Morgan, a negro woman got aboard led a motor common carrier from Gloucester County in the state of Virginia headed for Baltimore, Maryland. When she was asked to give up her seat to a white person and move to the back of the bus and a law in Virginia ordered. However, she refused to give away her seat stating that the bus she boarded was an interstate bus and that the Virginia law that demanded she give up her seat did not apply here. Upon refusal to give up her seat, Irene Morgan was arrested and charged, under a state law that imposed the segregation of passengers in public facilities and public transportations based on their race. In 1946, Irene was tried and convicted of being in violation of a Virginia segregation law on interstate buses and, was also fined $10.…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the Supreme Court Case of Reed v. Reed, 1971, The Extent of Equal Rights, two parents sought the ownership of their deceased sons estate. Richard Lynn Reed was still a minot when he passed without a will addressing which of his possessions would go to whom, both of his parents, Cecil and Sally Reed, made advances to claim their adoptive sons land. Both Cecil and Sally filed applications to become the administrator of the estate to the Idaho court, who then held a joint hearing for them. The court came to the conclusion that the Richards father, Cecil, would be granted administrator because the Idaho law dictated that “if several persons who are equally entitled to administer an estate file a petition, ‘males must be preferred to females. ’”(Supreme…

    • 263 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Reed V. Reed Summary

    • 313 Words
    • 2 Pages

    While states have a substantial amount of independence in determining what statutes they impose, those statutes are subject to being challenged as unconstitutional. Such challenges will be reviewed in accordance with the constitutional balancing tests to determine what level of scrutiny should be applied. In this case, Ann wishes to challenge a state statute that prioritizes the rights of males over females as an estate administrator. 1. Ann can claim a violation of the equal protection clause of the constitution.…

    • 313 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Malloy V. Hogan Summary

    • 251 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The ruling of The United States Supreme Court on Malloy v. Hogan,378U.S. 1(1964), the court was confronted with the issue of whether Mr. Malloy could utilize his Fifth Amendment right. To ensure that he did not incriminate himself in criminal activity during questioning in the state trial in the State of Connecticut (Neubauer and Fradella, 2009). The Supreme Court saw that the defendant had answered four of five questions during his testimony during the hearing and upon the last issue, Mr. Malloy invoked his Fifth Amendment right not to respond to the question. The State of Connecticut argued that the witness had answered the other matters without concern and found no reason that he should not respond to the last question asked to Mr.…

    • 251 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In early American history, not many Supreme Court cases had a larger impact than the impact felt after the ruling in McCulloch v. Maryland 17 US 316 (1819). The impact of this case is still felt today and a reverse judgement would have changed the landscape of this country’s financial system. McCulloch v. Maryland was argued in late February and early March of 1819, and decided on March 6, 1819, three days after the final arguments (Oyez). Although this case is not taught as often as Marbury v. Madison, it is still one of the more important judgements in early United States history and helped expand the power of the federal government through the supremacy clause and the commerce clause.…

    • 1395 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When the privacy of students comes into question there are mixed responses, especially when it comes to the contents of a student’s bag. From the landmark supreme court case TLO v. New Jersey, the privacy students have in school has inevitably come into question. Whether TLO or New Jersey was right, this court case changed the way we look at students and their privacy. Some may argue that students have no privacy in school while others may think they have too much. Has the Supreme Court already decided where they stand on this hot button topic?…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The struggle between the Native Americans and the Americans was extremely relevant and volatile during the 1800’s. The struggle escalated in 1830 when Andrew Jackson passed the Indian Removal Act (“Worcester”). As a result, new issues arose on a fight that had been around for centuries between the Native Americans and the Americans. One major collateral outcome of this act is the Supreme Court case, Worcester vs. Georgia. This case and the results of it turned out to be a major step forward for the Native Americans fighting for their rights and freedom during this time.…

    • 1617 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mcculloch V. Maryland

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages

    One of the most intellectual forces of the Marshall Court was its importance on the Supreme Court's power in Marbury v. Madison. Preceding to the Marshall Court, organizers of the Constitution, For example, Alexander Hamilton inquired the Supreme Court part as the lowest part of the major branch of government. The Marshall Court changed this knowledge in Marbury v. Madison. The case's crucial issue was whether the court had the power to support a constitutional check on the case.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    II. THE FOURTEENTH CIRCUIT CORRECTLY HELD THAT THE OFFICERS ARE ENTITLED TO QUALIFIED IMMUNITY BECAUSE THERE IS NOT A CLEARLY ESTABLISHED RIGHT TO RECORD OFFICERS WHO ARE NOT ON NOTICE. The doctrine of qualified immunity shields government officials from civil damages as long as their conduct is not violating a clearly established statutory or constitutional right of which a reasonable person would have known. Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800, 818 (1982).…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To some extent, Judge Thorpe is undoubtedly in effect saying that we should infringe on Sultaana Freeman’s religious beliefs because Mrs. Freeman is not going to break all of her religious beliefs, just the one of her exposing her face for religious reasons. Yes, Judge Thorpe is looking out for the community. She stated, “The state has always had a compelling interest in promoting public safety”. Of course she would want to prevent any dreadful events to happen to the community. Judge Thorpe also makes remarks of Mrs. Freeman by saying, “[She] most likely poses no threat to national security”.…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays