Wealthy Americans

Decent Essays
I disagree with Singer that wealthy Americans have a moral responsibility to give money to charities. It is not the responsibility of wealthy Americans to donate large amounts of money to charities that help children. The wealthy Americans should not be told what to do with their money. Wealthy Americans put in the time and effort to earn the money and have the right to keep it all for themselves if the choose. Additionally, if wealthy Americans are supposed to give large portion of their income to charities to help children in other countries isn’t there a point at which they are not considered wealthy anymore. Yes they are still making the same income but they are giving most of it away so in the end they won’t have a large sum of money left

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    “It is quite obvious that the ethics of none of us are clearly defined…formerly when it was believed that poverty was synonymous with vice and laziness, and that the prosperous man was the righteous man, charity was administered harshly with a good conscience; for the charitable agent really blamed the individual for his poverty…” (Addams, 1902). Unlike Sumner, Addams believes that it does not matter from what social class the individual is from, society requires more than taking care of one-self and families; it is about the social obligation of helping each other. In other words, just like in Sumner’s writing; Addams also believes that such opinions of poverty levels create the different social classes that separates the wealthy from the poor. Therefore, those individuals in the “rich class” can advance logically, materially, and industrially without any problems; while those individuals in the “poor class” are thought to never be able to move ahead and become successful because of their own…

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Peter Singer Poverty

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages

    I believe that people should has the right to control his or her own wealth that they work hard for. Since it is a hard earned money, it always a struggle to whether give the money away and the feeling of not getting enough money. No one can force you to donate your money to the charity of you don’t want to and donating toward charity is something that should be done out of the goodness of your heart. Overall, Peter Singers has a strong examples to persuade his readers to donate their money toward charity in order to fight poverty and hunger and to support his altruistic position. His arguments against “fair share” and “crowd ethic” are very well thought out.…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Singer contends that we generally have an ethical obligation and duty to help those at risk, and spare them wherever possible. Narveson believes that while it is noble to help another person on the off chance that it bears the little cost to ourselves, this isn't required for us to be…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The moral dilemma shown here, is the same one that Singer believes occurs every time an American who already owns a TV chooses to go out and buy a new one. Instead of using this excess money to upgrade their television, they should be donating it to prevent the deaths of kids in need. Even though these two decision both have different factors to them, they both could lead to the same result. Except, in one scenario a kid dies by being sold to an organ peddler, and in the other a child dies of hunger on the street.…

    • 348 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Singer failed to consider why people work so hard. While it is in good spirit to give to the needy and homeless, it is also in good spirit to enjoy the fruit of one’s labor. And if the needy and homeless people, who are capable of getting a job and improving their condition, would try better and do what they need to do, then the number of people on the street will reduce…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his 1889 review, Andrew Carnegie promoted what he called “The Gospel of Wealth”. He believed it was the obligation of those who accumulated to money to use it to promote the advancement of society. Like Carnegie, I believe that it is the responsibility of the 1% to use their wealth to aid the poor and not to buy lavish but pointless materialistic items. I believe that they should take it upon themselves to ensure that those who work hard will receive the opportunities…

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Singer does not provide criteria to decide on what is morally comparable. Also, I will deny Singer’s conclusion that we are obligated to donate as much as we can to help end poverty. I will argue that donating to charity is supererogatory, which means that donating to charity is not obligated, but instead a positive thing to do. I will also deny his second premise which states that it is our moral responsibility to prevent bad things from happening to other people.…

    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    He does this first by presenting a drowning child situation that attempts to convince people to agree with his main moral principle that people are morally obligated to prevent bad things from happening that would not result in a loss of something of equal moral value. Singer claims that should a person agree that one is morally obligated to save a drowning child with the cost of dirtying their clothes, they therefore must also agree to donate their surplus of money until they themselves are in poverty, because doing so would not risk anything of equal moral value. Contrary to Singer’s argument, one might still be able to agree with his main moral principle without donating all of their money to help prevent poverty. It follows logically this main moral principle is equally applicable to other issues such as the environment, as the degradation of the environment is another bad thing that is preventable to the same extent as poverty. With critical analyzes of Singer’s argument, it may be concluded that one may consistently agree with the initial premises of Singer’s argument without agreement to his conclusion of morally obligatory…

    • 1478 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Singer advocates that an individual practice marginal utility, which is when the person giving reaches the same material level as the person who is receiving the charity (236). His claim for this follows that it would alleviate the…

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Greed In America

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The yearn to give rather than receive is something taught at a young age. In someone's childhood, that lesson is never skipped preferentially explained correctly. Growing up and becoming selfless, putting kin before you, and supplying others around you, suddenly becomes a choice. In an ordinary Americans lifetime, a working man or women would never be able to afford giving to other countries in crisis. Not only do they have to feed and aid their own kids, but only from being human they will have a longing for luxuries.…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    First and foremost, people can’t control whether or not they are born into a wealthy family. If you have money, great. If you don’t, that’s okay. The moral is that we are all human beings. Objects like money shouldn’t determine if we have a good future or a bad one.…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    "The person who said this was a vice president of a trust department. He made these comments following a focus group interview and dinner that we hosted for ten first-generation millionaires. His view of millionaires is shared by most people who are not wealthy. They think millionaires own expensive clothes, watches, and other status artifacts. We have found this is not the case (Thomas & William, 1996)".…

    • 219 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Does that have any meaning, though, if the end result - people’s lives being saved - is the same? Like mentioned prior, some of the people in the world have no other option. Whether it is a morally correct thing for one to donate when considering their motives, is not something that would cross the minds of those who are living in extreme poverty where those around them are dying and they are simply waiting their turn. Singer states that philanthropists such as Bill Gates and Warren Buffet are donating large sums of money towards solutions to global poverty, not due to motivations of personal divine salvation, but rather more likely out of a sense of duty. So the motivations of those who donate should simply be to better the state of his fellow man, but as well as if there were a government mandated requirement to donate then that would remove the question of if it 's their personal motives or not out of the question…

    • 1149 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Singer’s use of moral reasoning and logic in his hypothetical examples of Dora and Bob, along with his breakdown of what an American family needs to make in order to take care of their needs, was able to convince me of this position. We only need a certain amount of resources to survive ourselves, so whatever extra we have should be given to help save others in…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The wealthiest Americans receive the greatest benefits, but they insult the rest of us by treating their tax responsibility like a game.” Again, the wealthy people that he is describing are the people who have either inherited the money, or so called “fake suits”, or are people who have made their money by climbing the corporate ladder of large corporations that have deceived average citizens to become so broad. We look at one’s reasoning, such as Paul Ryan’s, and think that it is easy to see why we should make the rich pay more. We could easily believe that they are playing games with us and we are simply a pawn in their enormous corporate scandal.…

    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays