Wealth Inequality Research Paper

Decent Essays
In our current society in the United States, wealth inequality has grown by leaps and bounds. As time is passing, we are seeing that the rich individuals in our communities are getting richer and the poor individuals are getting poorer. This is to be expected with capitalism at the base stage, but one would think that there would be measures in place to prevent the poor from getting too much poorer. However, in the United States at least, some of the wealthiest members of society are, unfortunately, also lawmakers. Many politicians write laws that only make them wealthier, while putting the financial burden on the lower income individuals and families of the population. This must be changed, as the average person cannot be expected to slave their lives away for a paycheck so the wealthiest members …show more content…
The truth of the matter is this: the wealthiest members of society already pay more taxes than anyone else, as far as numbers go. However, the wealthiest one percent of the Earth’s population also owns roughly forty-eight percent of the world’s wealth. Obviously this group would pay more taxes – they have nearly half of the world’s wealth. In a society where the rich politicians make the laws and ultimately control the lives of the average citizen, there is no wonder that there are ways they can avoid paying their share in taxes. This cannot be tolerated; everyone must pay their dues to the governments under which they live, whether they are public service employees or not. In the words of Thomas Paine, “Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil; in its worst state, an intolerable one.” Taxes must be paid, no matter how one feels about the system and there must be no loopholes; not for the rich and not for the poor. Rather, the entire system that governs how we pay our taxes must be completely revised to be fair to all Americans, no matter their backgrounds or their

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Some believe the rich should pay more in taxes in addition to others are complaining about how easy the rich have it. The chances are that the author who makes such a statement is highly likely to be uneducated or simply frustrated. However, some make valid points, and they have reasons for their opinion. A well-known politician, Paul Ryan, wrote about this issue and stated, “We 're all dependent on the government services that we too easily take for granted. The wealthiest Americans receive the greatest benefits, but they insult the rest of us by treating their tax responsibility like a game.” Again, the wealthy people that he is describing are the people who have either inherited the money, or so called “fake suits”, or are people who have made their money by climbing the corporate ladder of large corporations that have deceived average citizens to become so broad.…

    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Income and Wealth Inequality It is without a doubt that income and wealth inequality is the largest corrosive force toward a decent economy in the United States. The effect of the rich getting dramastically richer while the poor have lost what little they had has lead to some economists labeling the last 20 years as the “Age of Greed.” Income & wealth inequality in America has placed many people below the poverty line and squeezed middle class families; the implementation of a living wage, a higher tax rate on the rich, as well as the formation of impartial community institutions, will create a fair economy. The Age of Greed has been brought on by what Social Trends and Indicators USA calls "Trickle down" theories, that took hold and were…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Flat Tax Hardships

    • 1025 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A very important reason a flat tax should not be implemented as the United States new way of taxation is because it penalizes the low-income segment of the population. Laurence Kotlikoft states that a flat tax would be “hitting the poor on every dollar they earn and exempting the rich on virtually all of their earnings.” This indicates that implementing a flat tax favors the rich, whereas it would be hurting the poor. While the rich are keeping more of their money, the middle class is penalized and would pay higher taxes than they would have originally needed. Middle-class and working-class people are what stimulate the economy. In addition to, in Holley Ulbrich’s article, Flat Tax Is Class Warfare, she states, “the attraction of simplicity hides a big change in the distribution of tax obligations among the poor, the middle class, and the rich.” Holley is ultimately stating people are more enticed by the simple nature of the flat tax that they tend to fail to notice the hardships on those the flat tax would undermine.…

    • 1025 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    There is an inequality that those that are wealthy still pay the same amount of taxes as those who aren’t are. The reason why it’s a problem is because those that are wealthy don’t understand the struggles of having to pay what other have to pay. To them it could be pocket change, where as to those struggles it could be the brink of poverty. There are policies being introduced to cut the loopholes that these wealthy have in order to prevent income inequality. Altogether these reasons affect the cost of living to millions of Americans.…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Wealth Inequality Essay

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Davis and Moore state that certain jobs or professions that require good education and knowledge should reward more by paying more whereas jobs that can be done buy a person without much skill or education should pay less. This is true in the United States to point. Of course doctors and lawyers make more than a store manager for example , but many jobs such as being a president are not rewarded well, because a basketball player or a celebrity can make millions more than a president. This is unfair because carrying out the job of a president is a lot harder than acting or playing a certain sport. If the Davis-Moore thesis actually been accepted by a society than the president would probably make the most…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Modern Wealth Inequality

    • 1810 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Our economic system is ruled by the rich and largely benefits them at the cost of the majority of people. The wealth of the world is concentrated in the small upper class and does not move down to the lower classes. Instead, the opposite is happening. As the issue of wealth inequality is getting worse, more money is moving from the lower classes to the upper class, creating an even larger divide between the two. In the United States, “the top 1 percent of households… owned 35.4 percent of all privately held wealth [in 2012], and the next 19 percent… had 53.5 percent, which means that just 20 percent of the people owned a remarkable 89 percent, leaving only 11 percent of the wealth for the bottom 80 percent.” (Wood) The divide between the poor and the rich is not only growing in “‘hubs such as Wall Street and Silicon Valley, but also in virtually every corner of the world’s richest nation: Inequality has increased in 49 of 50 states since 1989,’ with Mississippi being the only exception, even as it still ‘ranks worst in the nation on both counts.’” according to a 2012 Reuters investigative report.…

    • 1810 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Due to income inequality the rich have increased influence on the politicians, making a more the representation of American people as a whole marginally more inaccurate. Many people are not getting college education everywhere in America when, given the chance, college education would raise the chances…

    • 1344 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    1: What is Trickle-down economics Trickle- down economics is the idea that the money that the “Super Rich” spend circulates and promotes growth in the economy and benefits others. It is the theory that the drivers of economic growth are people that are successful in the economy and that from the tax cuts they receive they will spend more of their money in the economy and invest in business’s which will supposedly generate more jobs. Yet if this is in fact true then why is it that the living conditions are still bad and jobs are at an all-time low. It is promoting inequality and creating a bigger divide between the working class citizen and the super-rich. According to research done by (YouTube video) Britain is the only economy that has grown…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Introduction Income inequality is a major concern in wealthy countries and especially the United States, where the gap between the rich and the poor is continuously increasing and the social effects can be seen on a larger scale. It may be true that some level of inequality does not harm nations, as it can provide people with incentives to become better by improving their skills. However, this phenomenon is out of control and puts the country into a stagnating growth phase which generates instability and social disparity. Inequality can be measured in various ways, but the simplest one is to compare what people at the top 1% earn vs. what people in the typical middle class earn. The newest trends define the middle class as people who earn between…

    • 1672 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Though this can be the result of the “American Dream”, it is important to establish that drastic economical inequality will directly conflict with political equality. Economic inequality is beneficial to the extent at which people strive to achieve goals. However, when greedy business executives abuse their power and wealth, politics tend to be swayed with fiscal renumeration. People who live paycheck-to-paycheck and have a routinized labored job typically have low political influence because of time. They do not have high political efficacy because they believe they are not worthy to influence politics due to their lack of education and wealth.…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays