Bill has prospered, having two options for employees. The first, which is the Montgomery G.I. Bill, gave member the benefit of receiving up to $1648 per month for 36 months for tuition (Vermillion, 2014). In 2008, a new G.I. bill was passed in result of an economic decision weighing economic cost during a time the nation was at war. The Post 9/11 GI bill was created in efforts to pay 100% tuition for undergraduate programs for any one active duty after September 11, 2001 (Brooks, 2008). Not only does this bill offers full tuition, it also provides up to a $1000 for book stipend and a basic housing allowance to ensure veterans coming out are making a smooth transition into civilian life. Both bills ensure 100% benefits as long as the member has been in for 3 years or more with an honorable discharged. This factor alone depicts this special program as a motivational tool to increase military recruits and become and remain productive members of the Armed Forces. Moreover, both G.I. bills can be transferred dependents such as spouses or children (Vermillion, 2014). Not only does this program motivates workers to pursue the military as a career and stay in for ten years or more because of the stability, but it also creates smarter and strong …show more content…
By using the neoclassical production theory and data of an automobile company, J. R. Norsworthy and Craig A. Zabala concluded that the U.S. industry could be more competitive against Western Europe and Japan by improving human resource management (Norsworthy, Zabala, 1990, p.58). They found a strong correlation between workers attitudes and productivity cost, which confidently affects the total factor productivity (Norsworthy, Zabala, 1990, p.73). This can correlate to the military as a corporation. It is evident that the government used and continues to keep the G.I. bill to decrease employee’s feeling unappreciated, have unresolved grievances, or even make the decisions to not