Was The Atomic Bomb Justified?

Improved Essays
The development of nuclear weapons led to the use of the atomic bomb in world war two. The atomic bomb was made and tested in the United States, it proved to be successful and was dropped on Hiroshima, and Nagasaki, which were two cities in Japan. The atomic bomb was a new weapon that was bigger and caused more destruction than any bomb previously invented. It caused widespread destruction where the first bomb hit Hiroshima, and followed with the second bomb three days later in Nagasaki causing the Japanese to surrender, ending the Second World War. The dropping of the atomic bomb is seen as a controversial issue because people differentiate on the secrecy, humanity, and necessity in its use. The united states was justified in its use of the atomic bomb, but did have options avoiding secrecy among our Russian allies, or could have gone with more humane plans proposed that would also have won America the war. The …show more content…
The reason many believe the atomic bomb could have been avoided is because it is believed that japan would have surrendered if the United States had invaded Japan. Other alternatives suggested by the Franck committee were to use the atomic bomb in a demonstration given as a warning to Japan to surrender. The scientific panel of the interim committee recommended using the atomic bomb. They believed a demonstration would not end the war, and therefore the bomb required direct military use. Undersecretary of the navy ralph bard objected to the unannounced use of the bomb against Japan. He believed that Japan was already looking for a reason to surrender. Truman decided to use the bomb because it was deemed the most effective way of all the plans to get the Japanese to surrender quickly. The use of the bomb was viewed as the better option because during an invasion of Japan many American lives would be lost while a whole city of japan could be ruined with one nuclear

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    During WWII, President Franklin Delano Roosevelt approved the development of the atomic bomb, a project that became known as the Manhattan Project, out of fear that the Nazis would try to build and use a nuclear weapon. After FDR’s death, President Truman inherited the most powerful weapon in the history of mankind and was left with the choice of using it or not. Undoubtedly, his decision changed the world in so many ways, and is largely thought and taught that dropping the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was necessary to end the Pacific War. Conversely, there were a number of alternatives the United States could have considered to avoid exposing our world to nuclear weapons while still triumphing in a Japanese agreement to an unconditional…

    • 1859 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    First, I investigated the sources that were against the use of the bomb before the bomb was dropped including the intentions behind the bomb, and concerns from the Interim Committee . Then I looked at the evidence against the bomb after the bomb was dropped, including Henry Stimson’s concerns, and the horrific loss of Japanese life due to the bomb. It is interesting to see the difference between the worries before the bomb and after the bomb. The first document I looked at was Dropping the Atomic Bomb was Neither Necessary Nor Justifiable by Gar Alperovitz. In his essay he argues one of the reasonings for the use of the bomb was to scare the Soviets and to prevent an invasion of the Red Army in Manchuria.…

    • 1359 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If the United States decided against using the atomic bomb, U.S. soldiers would have invaded Japanese islands. This operation was named Operation Downfall, and this invasion would have led to thousands of casualties. Japan was willing the literally fight to the death and President Truman knew that if we didn’t use the atomic bomb that the United States would continue to fight as long as Japan was still standing. An ironic justification for dropping the bomb is not only did it save American lives, but it also saved Japanese lives. It was predicted that if Operation Downfall took place that anywhere from 5 to 10 million Japanese casualties would have occurred.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Overall, the use of the atomic bombs was justified and would be what any moral person would choose given President Truman’s…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The decision to use the atomic bomb posed several significant moral dilemmas for President Harry S. Truman, among these were justifications, alternatives, and complications of the situation. After Teddy Roosevelt 's death, Truman was the new president with a huge decision to make only a few months after. People felt Truman was an insecure man and poorly informed by Roosevelt until his entry to the presidency. It was months later that he learned of America’s dark secret, the Manhattan Project. There were presumably three possible alternatives available to Americans to avoid using the atomic bomb such as invasion, increasing bomb threats and blockades of Japan, and negotiating peace.…

    • 1237 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Was America justified in dropping the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki? On August 6th, 1945, the US dropped an atomic bomb on the city of Hiroshima. It was the first time a nuclear weapon had been used in combat, against civilians. Between 40,000 and 60,00 people died instantly, and many more would die in the aftermath, either due to their injuries or radiation poisoning.…

    • 1739 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For example, Kimura (2013) explains that the Acting Secretary of State at that time, Joseph C. Grew, had asked Truman to make the conditions for surrender more flexible to prevent prolonged war, but Truman felt that America had an upper hand and deserved a better deal. Russian participation would also have ended the war. Kirstein (2013) explains that it is possible that Truman was in a hurry to end the war to prevent sharing the proposed occupation with the Russians as they did in Germany. Gordin (2012) suggests that it may have been used to intimidate the Russians. Kirstein (2013), Miscamble (2008), and Kimura (2013) purport that the bomb had to be used because it was intended to be that way based on Roosevelt’s plan.…

    • 1513 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Truman’s choice to drop the bomb on Japan was justified since it helped in ending the war rapidly. Truman made the right call, to drop the atomic bomb, in order to end the war, gain back the economy, to show who is the strongest nation, and to have less blood being spilled. Likewise, it is developed that dropping the atomic bomb has offered Japan to stop engaging the war. Japan surrenders and agrees that they won 't have the ability to fight another war after the end of World War II. Some Japanese pioneers agreed that the assaulting fundamentally pounded Japan 's vitality to continue with the war.…

    • 1751 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The atomic bomb was a good way to end the war because it saved over a million American lives and brought a quick end to the war. President Truman was faced with a tough decision when he was faced with the terrible consequences of war, but in the end, when we look back on it, he clearly made the right choice when he decided to drop the atomic bomb. In order to understand Truman 's decision you have…

    • 1441 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On August 6, 1945, in response to World War II and Japan’s vicious attacks on the U.S., the United States launched the atomic bomb “Little Boy” on the city of Hiroshima, Japan. 80,000 people died, and sixty percent of the city was destroyed. Three days later, a second bomb was dropped on Nagasaki, in which killed 70,000 people instantaneously and many more in the following weeks. These atomic bombs resulted in pure destruction and chaos for Japan and its people. Although the atomic bombs destroyed part of Japan and took many lives with them, the dropping of the atomic bombs were justified because the U.S. aimed for the complete and utter destruction of Japan and Japan remained a major threat that needed to be eliminated.…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The bomb saved lives, also the Interim Committee supported President Truman, and Japan were given warnings to surrender. The nuclear weapon was used to save American lives. American lives were in danger as well as American soil. The Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor, moreover killing over 2,000 Americans.…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Time and time again the United States of America has proven itself to be a lethal force in war, this is both the nation’s greatest wartime strength and its weakness. When the United States dropped two atomic bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, killing thousands of Japanese and instituting the conclusion of conflict in the Pacific Theatre of WWII, it was proven to the world how ruthlessly violent the nation truly is. The United States’ use of the atomic bomb was not necessary primarily as it caused massive civilian causalities. Additionally, the decision to drop the bombs was not properly justified, as Japan at the time was already very crippled and the Axis powers were on the brink of losing the war. Unequivocally, the dropping…

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As it is essential to recognize that not only was Japan ready to surrender and were given no choice to modify its unconditional surrender. But also destroyed two cities which were limited in military value and had civilians out number Japanese troops, but also were destroyed simply fro power in politics between the U.S and the Soviet Union. The facts from the presidents administrators, secretary of war and even Truman’s chief of staff all stood together and stated that it was unethical, barbaric and abhorrent. Many historians have fought continuously over which was decision was right or wrong to choose, but most evidence indicates that it was the wrong thing to do morally. Furthermore, the bomb was used for several wrong reasons such as causing fear to both Soviet and Japanese governments, in order to put an end to the war and be capable of unconditionally place restrictions at both governments basically holding both countries hostage until their demands were…

    • 1429 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “ The fact that we can release atomic energy ushers in a new era in man’s understanding of nature’s forces.” This statement above was by President Harry S. Truman and was featured in his official White House press release for the Hiroshima bombings on the 6th of August 1945. The heart of this statement poses countless questions about the nature of the bombings; as did the justification for bombing a non-military city bring a means to an end or an end to the means. There are lingering questions surrounding the ethics of atomic and nuclear weapons, asking whether the United States truly had justifiable reasons for Hiroshima. Although it ended the physical warfare of the Second World War, the United States had no true ethical justification for the Hiroshima bombings of 1945, primarily due to the fact that these bombings were militarily…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    When the atom bomb was invented by the United States the people believed that it would be a savior to the war that was occurring, but fate would have the bomb be a global phenomenon as the world stood in awe of its catastrophic power. Having such a weapon that would most certainly win the war for your country was an amazing thought, and of course many country’s believed that too, which inevitably led to the cold war. What were to follow was a race to develop these bombs many of the world’s leading chemists worked hands on, it also led to many advancements in other fields of science. The invention of the atomic bomb and its use are they justified, they have definitely left their mark on human history and are here to stay. First off, before a nuclear bomb was ever made a man by the name Leo Szilard theorized that if an…

    • 1609 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays