Was The 2000 Election Fair?

Improved Essays
Have you ever wondered if the 2000 presidential election was fair? Well many people have wondered what would have happened if there had been a recount. This election was won off the fact that the US Supreme Court ruled in favor of George Bush. This meant the recount was called off and George Bush won the 2000 presidential election. The US Supreme Court made the wrong decision because there is a standard for recount, they didn’t count all of the votes that were placed and not every person was treated equally.

First, there is a standard for recount which means that Florida was not treating different counties unfair. If voters were clearly trying to vote for Al Gore then they should all be represented equally. There were many votes that were

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    According to Gary Bugh, in the 2000 election, Nader received around 90,000 votes in Florida, which resulted in George Bush winning Florida (51). Bugh also stated, that if the citizens who voted for Nader would have voted for their second choice, which would have been Al Gore, that Gore would have won Florida (51). The same thing happened in the state of New Hampshire that year. According to Robert Dudley, who has a Ph.D. in Political Science, and Eric Shiraev, who has a Ph.D. in Political Psychology, Bush had beaten Gore by only around 7,000 votes (141). Later on Dudley and Shiraev said that according to the polls 8,000 of the 22,000 who voted for Nader would have voted Gore before Bush (141).…

    • 1085 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ronald Reagan received 50.7% of the popular vote, and won the presidential election by collecting 91% of the electoral votes. This big margin of difference shows how the electoral college does not accurately show what the people want. States like Idaho that have a population of over 1.5 million people will only get 4 electoral votes, making their opinion in the presidential election extremely small. George C. Edwards states in Document D that “the electoral college violates political equality. It is not a neutral counting device..…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Having seen this, it was not a fair election because not every vote was counted. Anyhow, the electoral college has been our way of election our presidents for this country for over…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “...The Electoral College makes sure that the states count in Presidential elections...federalism [the combination of a central government with some authority given to state and local governments] is central to our grand constitutional effort to restrain power” (Document C). Although initially intended to lend an ear to the public’s preferred candidate for the Presidency, there are no laws or amendments stating the members of the Electoral College must vote in accordance with the state they represent. Due to this error in representation of the public, the Electoral College rules according to the “minority” vote - going against the basic principles of Democracy. In all transparency, as noted in the elections of 1824, 1876, 1888, and 2000, it is possible for the popular candidacy vote to be negated by the Electoral College vote (Document G). In the election of 1842, Jackson was the popular choice, yet the Electoral College voted against the States and chose Adams for the Presidency.…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There were only 4 times in the 20th century of US presidential election that incumbent loses. The most recent election among them is a 1992 Presidential Election where George H.W. Bush loses to Bill Clinton. In the beginning of the election, not many people thought that Bush was going to lose. However, national priorities were shifting with the rising new generation, the baby boomers. The Domestic economic was in chaos with unemployment rate that is highest in nine years.…

    • 1954 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Electoral College Flaws

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Dear State Senator, the electoral college is an obsolete system of election. Although the electoral college was an idea set by the founding fathers in the constitution, this form of election is not effective any longer. People have the right to vote, but this form of election is not directly voting for a representative. The electoral college essentially makes the people vote for electors who then have the opportunity to vote for whom ever they would like. The electoral system is an archaic system that needs to be exchanged for the popular vote because the people do not vote for an actual representative, the system has failed before, and the system has the opportunity to have an even greater mishap.…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Defective Electoral College In the 2016 election, many predicted a Clinton victory, but the accursed Electoral College denied her it and gave the nation Trump. When the founding fathers of America started their nation, they created the Electoral College to vote for the president. They did not trust people to have enough information to make the right decision in electing the president. For this reason, the citizens are actually voting for educated politicians who votes for the president.…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    “Direct election would resonate far better with the American value of one person, one vote. Indeed, the college was designed at the founding of the country to help one group-- white Southern males--” (Amar 1). For the second design of the Electoral College there were some changes made to construct more stability and decimate mistakes of the system. To prevent ties made in the presidential election, the Electoral College was made probable, if not inevitable, by the rise of political parties.…

    • 1846 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Andrew Jackson should've won, but John Q. Adams won, due to the Electoral College. A 3rd time in 1876 with Rutherford Hayes and Samuel Tiden, and a Fourth time in 1888 with Benjamin Harrison and Grover Cleveland. The last time took place in 2001 with George W. Bush. I believe they should remove the Electoral College because it takes away the right to…

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Is The Electoral College Fair? The controversy over whether or not the electoral college is fair has been happening since it was created. Many people don 't agree with how the electoral college does not reflect the true majority of votes but the electors votes instead. Others think that the electoral college was created for a reason and offers a voice to minority voters too. The electoral college is an interesting process that many people disagree with but many people realize that it was created for a reason.…

    • 1088 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There should not be any difference in votes between states. This effectively mean majority win, with popular vote. This gives no chance to any ambiguity interpretation of election result. There is only one total number of votes to count. The country should not be dragged into unnecessary debates and legal fights, like what happened earlier.…

    • 1330 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Eliminate the Electoral College What if it was possible for a presidential candidate to win the race for the white house with less than twenty-three percent of the popular vote? This is mathematically possible by manipulating America’s electoral college system just by winning whole states and not individual voters. Though not to this degree, this has before in America’s political history a total of three times. The Electoral College should be abolished because it uses a winner take all system. Moreover, it advocates candidates avoid states with big margins, thus the electoral college makes candidates interested in the needs of a few states instead of the needs of the whole nation.…

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Most people would agree that the ability to vote is one of the most potent ways for an American citizen to participate in the government. From electing state representatives to US senators, the American population chooses who is to govern them. But that is not the case when it comes to the election of the President. That job is left to appointed electors who are influenced by their own thoughts, their political parties and the popular vote of the nation in their decision of who is to be the president of the United States. Over the years of presidential elections the candidate who wins the popular vote additionally wins the electoral college votes.…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Electoral College Needs to be Abolished Every four years, millions of Americans rush to the polls to vote for the next President of the United States of America. What many Americans voting today may not know is that they are participating in an unfair system; this system is taking power from a majority of Americans and placing an emphasis on the few. The best solution to this problem is the simplest one, abolish the Electoral College and use a popular vote for the election of the most important position in the world, the President of the United States.…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    According to a source 1876 and 1888, presidential elections, 1789-2000; CQ Press,2002;2000, “Historical Election Results” U.S. Electoral…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays