Was Sherlock Holmes Responsible For The Adventure Of The Speckled Band

Sherlock Holmes was not responsible for the death of Doctor Grimesby Roylott. The ending of “The Adventure of the Speckled Band’ by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle consisted of Doctor Roylott dying due to the lethal snake. To begin, Sherlock Holmes was defending himself from the deadly swamp adder. Secondly, Sherlock Holmes was unaware of the precise location of Doctor Roylott. Lastly, due to the snake’s reiterated practice, it went back into Doctor Roylott’s room after going into the sisters’ room. If Sherlock’s skill with the cane, he, as well as Doctor Watson, would have been attacked by the vicious snake. The brave Sherlock Holmes was defending himself from the swamp adder. Holmes was clearly defending himself, which would make him irresponsible of Doctor Roylott’s death. To defend himself, he numerously struck the fake bell rope, which had the snake on it, with his cane. …show more content…
The wall in between Sherlock Holmes and Doctor Roylott prevented Holmes from seeing Doctor Roylott’s precise location. The swamp adder repeatedly practiced going back and forth between the two rooms. The snake knew the procedure to travel by using the extra space in the ventilator and the fake bell rope. To save his life, as well as Watson’s, Sherlock Holmes struck the snake for self-defense. Instead of using violence to move the snake, Sherlock could have secured the deadly snake by trapping it. The problem with that is, what in Helen’s bedroom could he trap it with. Furthermore, becoming closer to the snake would increase the chance of being bitten by it. Sherlock Holmes made the proper decision of striking the snake with his cane. By using his cane, Holmes kept a further distance between him and the snake, which lessened the chance of being bitten by the lethal snake. The same snake Doctor Roylott desired to use to murder his step-daughter with ended up being the snake that conceded him to meet his