Napoleon Bonaparte Individualism

Superior Essays
“Napoleon Bonaparte, the most extraordinary character who has ever yet figured on the great theatre of the world,” is how he was viewed in the early 19th century, during his rise to power, after the French Revolution. However, today the character of Napoleon and his achievements sparks a great debate between historians. Was he a true revolutionary or a dictator? Was he a reformer or repressive authoritarian? It would be simple to conclude that Napoleon did not promote the values of the revolution – especially after 1799 – but instead strived to achieve full supremacy not just in France but also across Europe. Though there is an element of truth to this, I put forward the argument that whilst Napoleon didn’t always act in accordance with the …show more content…
Within these rights was freedom of speech, a key issue, especially since the enlightenment had been part of what sparked the Revolution. This 18th century movement stood for individualism rather than tradition; exactly what the revolutionaries were attempting in ending the old regime. It has even been put forward that the “French Revolution really did represent the triumph of the enlightenment,” yet through his use of propaganda and censorship Napoleon demolished this value almost entirely. Even by 1811, “only four daily newspapers were appearing in Paris, all virtual instruments of the governments.” The fact that this is the same number of newspapers that had legal privilege to publish in the capital before 1789 just shows the sincerity and extent of censorship at this time, thus reversing the intended revolutionary impact. Napoleon even stated himself that he wouldn’t “allow the papers to say or do anything contrary to my interests.” However, some historians have argued in defence of Napoleon’s actions at this time. Woloch stated that everyone was aware of the regime’s “control of the media” and Roberts argument causes great debate as he stated that although it was “objectionable by modern standards, Napoleon’s move was little other than standard practice for his time and circumstances.” …show more content…
Whilst he was in power his actions did help preserve key values of the Revolution and attempted to secure the liberty, equality and fraternity of the French people. What is difficult to conclude however is whether he continued to do this after 1799. Martyn Lyons stated, “at various moments in his career his own ambitions diverged from the cause of the revolution” and I think this became the case especially after he made himself Emperor. He still saw himself as the son of the revolution and believed his actions were all revolutionary but more often than not they were a result of his own ambition, he had the power to re-introduce hereditary rule, create a state centred around censorship and propaganda and surround himself with collaborators who always insisted that “the basic gains of the revolution stood as their priority.” Winston Churchill once said that Napoleon Bonaparte was “The greatest man of action born in Europe since Julius Ceasar.” There is no doubt that Napoleon begun so successful because of his successes in battle but as a leader of France he effectively created a dictatorship, refuting many of the values and achievements of the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    As I stated above, those that are pro Napoleon like his role in ending the French Revolution because he brought stability and rights to France, and ended monarchy. However, also he ended it, he himself became a dictator, much like a monarch. Also, although he did improve France in some ways, many of those advances were lost, including monarchy, since after his reign monarchy made a return, not as strong but it was still present, and wasn’t completely abolished until years later. There were also many positive aspects about the French Revolution that Napoleon subverted. He became so obsessed with having power that he got ahead of himself and ended up taking too much control of the people of France, and limited the freedom that he claimed was there as stated in his Napoleonic Code.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    One such examples has been stated by the historian Asa Briggs and Patricia Calvin ‘a Council of state in which no single minister had any independent authority of his own will.’ This act was formed from the cause of the revolution; it was mainly condoned by Napoleon. It leads to believe that this act shows that Napoleon was a revolutionary as a change in political government is a part of the meaning of a revolutionary. To the people this was advantageous as a change can be viewed good or bad. To the people Napoleon was a hero, to most historians it is coherent that this change brought about by Napoleon made him seem less like a military dictator and like a revolutionary. However, others may see this act as a method of control over France and its government.…

    • 1963 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    . .” (Reader, pp. 448-449) These unalienable rights mentioned are rights that are presumed to be natural, as in universal to all people, but when the colonists were not being fairly represented by the government of Great Britain, which they were still expected to abide by, they felt like those rights were not being given to them, and so they revolted against their homeland. Prior to the beginning of the revolution, Great Britain had been doing things such as sending troops to wage war in the colonies, imposing unfair taxes and blocking off trade to other parts of the world, and making legislative decisions for the colonists without any say from the colonists themselves. (Reader, p. 450) The extensive listing of grievances to the king just went to show how fed up the colonists were, and made the revolution seem justifiable under the circumstances given.…

    • 1152 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Initially, Napoleon's ideals of the French Revolution revolved around three main ideas: liberty, equality, and fraternity. At first, he was successful in completing this by establishing the Napoleonic Code. The code, which is still extant today, established privileges based on birth, allowed freedom of religion, and specified that government jobs should go to the most qualified. This had a postitive impact on French society because it granted citizenship to everyone. However, through his ambition and need for power, Napoleon became a dictatorship and negatively affected France.…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1800 Thomas Jefferson and his Democratic-Republicans won back the presidency from the Federalist they claimed that it was a revolution and that they would be guardians of “agrarian purity, liberty and state rights”(The American Pageant). They believed that the Federalist had brought a bureaucracy to the newly founded nation and had betrayed the ideals of the American Revolution. Though Jefferson claimed he would do away with the Federalist actions like Alexander Hamilton’s bank he actually maintained the economic framework to help keep the prosperity for the newly founded nation. Jefferson however did get rid of some federalist economic ideals and had a very opposing view of how the deal with the debt the country faced. When it came to foreign…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    His attempt to unify France was accomplished due to his exceptional qualities. Napoleon was intelligent, self-disciplined, had everlasting energy and a willingness to plan things out in detail. “Politically, France had suffered a full decade of revolutionary turmoil by 1799, making the government unstable and corrupt” (The Age of Napoleon). The people had despondent attitudes because of economic unrest and longed for a stable government that would make their lives more secure. Napoleon divided France into 83 departments whose governors he appointed centrally.…

    • 1676 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the largest differences in these two wars is seen in the outcome. The American Revolution for a large part fulfilled its main goal, while the French Revolution did not succeed at making the changes they wanted. The colonists in America were fighting for independence from Britain, and when the war had ended, that is what they had. The United States became completely separate and was not controlled by the English. In contrast, while the French people wanted a change in government from a monarchy to a republic, they did not get what they fought for, instead the government became a dictatorship, the same or possibly worse that the previous monarchal situation.…

    • 1428 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Origins of Nationalism- Source Interpretation “Man is born free, but everywhere he is in chains.” This was first said by Jean Jacques Rousseau in 1762, and is attributed to helping ignite the spark that started the French Revolution. The people in France during and after this period of time had vastly differing ideals on nationalism and the revolution. Some feared their increased nationalism and the revolution would not help them at all, while others defended it to their last dying breath. These statements bring up of the question: to what extent did the French revolution succeed in uniting the people and bringing about a better society? The first source gives an overall tone and message of a strong and unbreaking passion towards…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The consulate came into power in france after the collapse of the directory government in 1799. The desperation of the French people was for the formation of a strong republic with leadership that would guranbtee them freedom, prosperity and security within their boarders.napoleon Bonaparte was the first consul that also included two other consuls. They performed different factions within the legilslative and constitutional mandates of their offices to foster progress in the french political system. After the defeat of monarchy by the French revolution, expectations were high among the citizens for a more robust economy. Military operations however maintained by their governments led to more taxes being demanded from the citizens in order to facilitate these operations.…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It made it very easy for him to rise up the ranks of the military, gain supporters, and take over France. There was so many problems that the government of France could not fix and Napoleon promised to make it better. Napoleon would not of been able to make these promises and achieve what he promised if the French Revolution hadn’t made it so easy for him to seem like a hero and a good leader. Napoleon would not of become the Emperor of France and historically significant if the French Revolution hadn’t happened. As stated on…

    • 1400 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays