Negative Impact Of Hernan Cortes

Improved Essays
- Hernan Cortes was born on 1485, in Medellìn, Spain. His father was a captain in the Spanish army. His parents wanted him to become a lawyer and sent him to school so he could study law, when he was fourteen. But Cortes wasn't interested in becoming a lawyer so 2 years later he returned home when he was sixteen years old.

“Cortes had heard of Christopher Columbus' discoveries in the new world. He wanted to travel and see new lands like Christopher Columbus.” He also wanted to make fortune and fame like Christopher Columbus did.

- Cortes had sailed for the New World in 1504. He arrived on the island of Hispaniola at the city of Santo Domingo. “In 1511, Cortes joined Diego Velazquez on an expedition to Cuba. When Velazquez conquered Cuba,
…show more content…
If you look at when Hernan Cortes conquered what is now Mexico and he claimed it for Spain the natives lost there culture and he treated them unfairly because they weren’t a part of Spain. “It meant that they were exploited for their labor and generally treated quite badly. In short, we can see Cortes as the symbol of imperialism and colonialism that destroyed the native way of life in Mexico.” From the native’s point of view Cortes was bad and impacted them in a negative way like they were outcasts. It shows that he treated people badly, in other words anyone who wasn’t up to his level or anyone who wasn’t from Spain. He liked Columbus because he had Gold and glory but not the natives because they weren’t form Spain or up to his level. Indigenous population thinks that Cortes impact was a negative impact because he killed the leader took control and changed the countries name and was aggressive towards the people there. But in his defense he wanted money and he wanted glory so when you want those stuff you become greedy and you force yourself to kill and people weren’t aware that it wasn’t his intension is was his intention but he became like that because he wanted money and glory he started to kill and burn ships down. Because of this people had a negative impact from him any country he wanted to control or take over he would kill that’s why there was a negative impact. Well if we look at the Spanish Conquest then we have to look at many things first of all did he kill a lot of people or no? He killed THOUSANDS. “Tenochtitlan was one of the largest cities in the world and has a population of several hundred thousand. There was another million people or so living in the areas surrounding Tenochtitlan!” To the native he was obviously a villain in their eyes because he wiped out and completely killed all the natives there and created another civilization. The areas/villages around there the people thought he was a

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Have you ever wondered about Santa Anna?Well today you will find closure for your curious ways. Antonio López de Santa Anna was born in Xalapa,Veracruz February 21,1794.Santa Anna attended the Military academy at the age of 16.He was an excellent warrior. Skilled at sword fighting and other battle tactics. Santa Anna’s idol was Napoleon Bonaparte. He had pictures of him all over his walls.…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Columbus’ misunderstanding and of the Native Americans and the New World was reflective of most of Europe in the late 15th century. This new land mass was seen as a commodity to exploit for money and its people as the new battlefield of the Holy Wars. The primitivation and racism that clouds most of Columbus’ writings also unfortunately colored the thoughts of leaders and explorers back in the Old World. Analyze the impact of colonization on Spain. Colonization allowed Spain to assert its newfound dominance, after successfully driving away the Muslims, into new lucrative frontier.…

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1492, Columbus sailed the ocean blue. Christopher Columbus discovered the new world in his voyages, but by accident. The reason for Columbus’s voyage was to find an alternate trade route to the Spice Islands And at this time the passage required Spain to go through the Mediterranean Sea. The sea, however, was controlled by the Ottoman Empire and required a hefty toll. For this reason, Columbus did “not go eastward by land in the usual manner but by the western way” (Doc 1).…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    So people were willing to go over to the Americas in search of easy riches like Cortes did. Nobody got as lucky as him and the only person to come close was Francisco…

    • 1367 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Christopher Columbus was an interesting man who changed human history. Christopher Columbus was born in Genoa, Italy. His father was a wool merchant and he also had two brothers. Columbus was married to Dona Felipa, but she soon passed after giving birth to their son,…

    • 1144 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Columbus set sail in 1492 and reached what he thought was the Indies in 30 days of sailing across the Atlantic. He landed in Hispaniola, and took back 10 indigenous people to convert to christianity. Colombus would come back and attempt to settle the land with a thousand men but fails. Later on a man named Nicola de Ovando arrived with two thousand five hundred men and established the first permanent base for spain.…

    • 535 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This argument seemed a little problematic. If the locals knew that the Spanish were heartless murderers, why would they decide join them and allow them to become even more powerful? It would be more logical of the native tribes ally themselves together and eliminate the Spanish instead. Overall, I find Smith's debunking of traditional explanations convincing but the part about genocides leading to control harder to believe. Even if that is a factor, there's got to be something else that kept the locals from…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I want to compare the way that the Spanish, French, and English interacted with the local Native Americans. Each country seemed to handle and deal with the natives in a different way. Each country was motivated by something different. For the Spanish, it was gold and riches. For the French, it was furs and land.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Conquistadors from Europe in the old world. (Europe, Asia, Africa) Came to the New world (North and south America) looking for gold and glory and to convert others to Christianity. They took natives who lived in the new world as slaves, they slaughtered them, and treated them cruelly. The Europeans had caused the genocide of Native Americans, the mass killing of this religious and cultural group, and it was all on purpose.…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When Columbus first met the Native American tribes, he reported that they were very friendly. “… people, and without greed, and docile in everything … I believe that in the world there are no better people or a better land, they love their neighbors as themselves (Doak 46).” After receiving specific orders to keep peace with the natives, Columbus proceeded to kidnap 1,200 of these Taino Native Americans, and sent them to Spain where they were paraded naked and sold into slavery. By sending these natives to Spain and forcing those who stayed to work on plantations and in mines, Columbus tore apart families and friends.…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    but he managed everything in an order and the people of this city were happy to their order. Thus, it was so surprising to Cortes he never saw a ruler like him in Europe. That’s why he mentioned him in his letters to…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    But he destroyed the Native culture. Mass destruction starting at violence, rape, disease, exaction, and finally Genocide. This is why Christopher Columbus is a villain. Work…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Contrary to what the infamous Black Legend says, the Spanish conquistadors were not reckless murderers without direction. They had a purpose: colonization. They needed to employ these vicious tactics in order to efficiently fulfill this purpose. The Spanish conquistadors were trailblazers in the most literal sense of the term; for instance, explorer Hernando de Soto and his soldiers tortured, raped, enslaved, and killed countless Indians, destroying almost everything in their path (Mann 6). While it is true that the Spanish conquistadors mistreated the Indians they encountered, and that the encomienda system was essentially slavery, the Spanish weren’t the only Europeans who treated the natives callously.…

    • 1115 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The exploration and domination of the New World by the Spanish during the 15th and 16th century have been interpreted as the result of groups of bloodthirsty soldiers wanting nothing more than gold in their rucksacks and kill counts in their heads. As history has made clear, Spanish priests were also important historical actors during this age of discovery who made it their task to convert the natives to Catholicism. The conquering soldiers physically torn at the Natives while, at the same time, the priests harmed the natives spiritually. The importance of history is that we can learn from the past to aid our future. In other words, does the blindness of Spanish culture while regarding the Natives justify the physical, social and religious destruction they caused to the Natives?…

    • 1874 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    “The ‘Wretched Indians’: What We Don’t Learn in History Books” The Spanish Conquest as we know it has been largely painted as a valiant and remarkable achievement deemed justifiable through widely-accepted perceptions of European superiority. Indeed, when taught about these expeditions, rarely are we given sources that encourage us to picture the Indigenous peoples fighting on the same side as the Spaniards; After all, the textbooks say they were the ‘bad guys’ to beat, right? Matthew Restall’s Seven Myths of The Spanish Conquest reveals the subjective perceptions of the Spanish Conquest in an attempt to help modify the erroneous aspects of the Indigenous peoples’ narrative. In addition, as noted by Restall, even William H. Prescott, a historian…

    • 1559 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays