Warrantless Searches Essay

Superior Essays
When someone closes the door to their house and locks it, they get a sense of feeling of privacy and safety as if that door could stop anything or anyone from coming through it. As a citizen of the United States you were guaranteed this right when the Bill of Rights was written and passed. The Fourth Amendment protects you from any unreasonable search and seizures, no warrants shall be issued without probable cause, supported by Oath. There are many different types of warrants and many exceptions to when a warrant is and is not needed for search and seizure.
Back in the early 1900s police officers did a lot of things that we would consider in today’s age as abuse of power, and police brutality. Freemont Weeks exploited this into his favor
…show more content…
Warrantless searches include: consent, plain-view, search incident prior to an arrest, exigent circumstances, automobile exception, and hot pursuit (Justia: Criminal Law, n.d). If consent is given voluntarily by a person then the area may be searched without a warrant. For example, if police want to search someone’s backpack and the person agrees to them searching there is no need for a search warrant. Plain-view is like stated earlier if an object is out in plain sight then the item can be seized as evidence. However, it must be completely in plain sight, an officer is not allowed to move an item to gain access or see another. Search prior to an arrest is primarily for the safety of the officer, an officer is allowed to search the person and immediate area for anything that could possibly harm the officer. This is usually done after the suspect has been put into handcuffs. The officer is looking for anything that can harm themselves or others. If an officer believes that a person is using their vehicle to hide contraband or weapons they may search that vehicle. For example, if you tried crossing the border from Mexico back into the United States and the officer at the border believes that you are smuggling contraband back into the United States, that officer has every right to dismember then rebuild whatever he believes you are using on the vehicle to hide the contraband. If an officer is in “hot pursuit” of a criminal an officer may entire any building or house, once inside they may search the entirety. If an officer is chasing a criminal in a vehicle and then the suspect flees his car, runs into somebody’s house and hides, the cop has every right to search every room in that house until the suspect is found and

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Otto Thief Case Study

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This is because the identification number of the car is not a breach of privacy. When the verification number on a car is being checked it is just verifying that the car is the one it is said to be. Also since the officers saw the vehicle during the arrest they can legally search the general area for things in plain sight, which the car was. The preservation of evidence is also an exception to searching inside a house incident to arrest. In the textbook it states that there are two main purposes of searching incident to arrest, safety and for evidence relevant to the crime.…

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Wilson Vs Arkansas

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Issue- Whether it was reasonable under the 4th amendment for the officers to enter a home without a warrant. Rule- Knock and Announce rule law enforcement has to knock and announce that they are police and wait a reasonable amount of time, usually seconds, before entering place before they search. (Wilson v Arkansas)…

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The plain view doctrine is a further exception to the warrant requirement. The doctrine outlines three requirements for law enforcement to validly seize an item without a warrant. “First, the police officer must lawfully make an ‘initial intrusion’ or otherwise properly be in a position from which he can view a particular area.” Any item the officer sees from a place of lawful access will have been viewed from a lawful vantage point. Second, the item must possess some quality to make it immediately apparent to the officer that she may seize it.…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kentucky Court Case

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Decision: The Supreme court reversed the decision of the lower courts, 8-1, warrantless searches that are being done in police-created exigent circumstances does not violate the 4th Amendment unless the police create the exigency by threatening or violating the 4th Amendment. Precedent Cases: Payton v. New York (1980)- Theodore Payton’s house was forcibly entered by New York City Police because they suspected him of a murder. Evidence was then found in the house that linked Payton to the crime. The police entered his home without a…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The 4th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution guarantees freedom from unreasonable search and seizure. Law enforcement officers need probable cause and in most case a warrant to search a person or their belongings. Any evidence collected from an illegal search will be excluded from evidence at trial. The purpose of the 4th Amendment is to protect citizens from being abused by the government and its law enforcement agencies. Students at public education institutions are also protected against unreasonable search and seizures of personal property, but students have a reduced expectation of privacy when in school.…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Fourth Amendment states "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. " It prohibits…

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution provides, "[t]he right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized”( Interests Protected law.cornell.edu). Probable cause is if there something that's easily to tell that something's wrong or not right. Like if it's a murder scene or they can smell drugs or smell alcohol in the car. But very many cases are being dismissed because of the failure of the use of a search warrant. Even though that really isn’t a good thing it assures you because of the fourth amendment you can't go to prison because it’s a cop's word against a civilians.…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fourth Amendment In Texas

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages

    As well the court also stated that detaining a person to require him to identify himself with lack of evidence against him/her violates their Fourth Amendment right. The Fourth Amendment requires such action,or that the seizure should be carried out pursuant to plan embodying explicit,neutral limitations of individual officers. In other words, a police officer can’t arrest you,detain you,or search you without a search warrant or an arrest warnat. Though there are some expectations on getting search or being detained,like for instances if a police officer asks your permission to search in your belongings and you agree then that’s not considered an intrusion of your privacy because you allowed him/her to search in your belongings. Same goes for being arrested because in order to be charged with a crime police officers must have reasonable suspicion and enough evidence to charge you with that crime.…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After finding out the officers violated the 4th amendment the judgment of this court was reversed. In order for this search to be legal there would have to be a good reason to search the house. This reason would be used to try to get a search warrant. Because they did not get a warrant, it is illegal. Even if the evidence is strong, it is not allowed to be used in…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Fourth Amendment: Search and Seizure In the Fourth Amendment, it states “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated” (Cornell University of Law). The Fourth Amendment states its main idea in this statement and through it American citizens and their belongings and records are protected from surveillance, searches, and seizures. However, in today’s digital world government officials have used what could be called an unconstitutional approach to the Fourth Amendment, causing them to monitor phone conversations. There have also been instances where personal records have been gained by law enforcement without any relevant reason.…

    • 1215 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Fourth Amendment

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Introduction The Fourth Amendment states that “the rights of the people to be secured in their persons, houses, papers and effects, against unreasonable search and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause supported, by the oath of affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched and the persons or things to be seized.” This simply means in laments terms that every US citizens is entitled and promised protections against personal and property invasion as well as entitled to be inform of the nature of the search and detailed what place and things are subject to be searched. The fourth amendments also lays out a requirement that a warrant must be obtained and must be done so only…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There is a finite line between national security and the privacy of innocent Americans in their day to day lives. The right to have privacy was provided to people when it was installed in the 4th amendment to the constitution. Although the U.S. Government has been stretching out this basic right and invading the privacy right that every American has. The government should not be allowed to freely use surveillance programs to watch over innocent people 's every move. Stated in the 4th amendment there is the right for people “to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated.…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The statement, “The Fourth Amendment protects people, not places,” is one of the most controversial statements in Criminal Procedure. The amendment’s purpose is to secure individuals’ rights to privacy within their houses, papers, and defends them against unreasonable searches and seizures. However, to what extent does the law preserve a person’s privacy? The Law of Search and Seizure and the Search Warrant, give the government strict to stipulations as to how they are able to rightfully obtain information that is presumed to be private. Although Searches, Seizures and Warrants seem to have simple guidelines, they are each intricate categories.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Another example why many people do not accept surveillance is because it has also affect the people by causing discrimination against one another. Greenwald also states “Some of the surveillance was ostensibly devoted to terrorism suspects. But great quantities of the program manifestation have nothing to do with national security.” (94) In this quote Greenwald says that many of the programs have nothing to do with national security because they don’t just see the information or everything there surveillance is capturing the government is saving everything not for a day nor a week but for years and this is information that they don’t need to have.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Surveillance has presented numerous challenges to the right of privacy. There is a need to develop a high technology surveillance system that will come with great benefits without intrusion. With new advances in technology each day, it is becoming easier to communicate with each other. Yet with all these new forms of communication there have been unpleasant side effects, since this new advanced technology is not only for harmless interactions between one another it is also used to plot against governments and countries. Governments have found themselves under attack a countless number of times and have had no other choice but to resort to monitoring their citizen’s online and phone activities.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays