Everyone wants to get a better life. Employees want to have a great job to support themselves and their family. Some companies treat employees with respect and fairness for establishing a company's reputation for fairness. Also, they want to reduce the possibility that the company becomes entangled in charges of discrimination, lengthy litigation, and costly settlements. However, employees were safeguarded by rights of workers in a workplace, weren’t they? After reading “Warning: This Is a Rights-Free Workplace” by Barbara Ehrenreich, I realized some rights, which was denied in the American workplace and I will present solutions for this problem.
Denying the Free-right workplace is not beneficial for employees, but cannot also be an improving …show more content…
According to the article “Warning: This Is a Rights-Free Workplace,” the author mentioned that “the supply of most kinds of labor is low, relative to the demand.” On the other words, the companies need some employees to work for them. In my opinion, people can quit a job or go well places to have more benefits and improving condition workplace. Moreover, I understand that workers have another option in a tight labor market. They need a job to support themselves, though, they know that they could be treated badly. For example, In the 1800s, many Americans worked seventy hours or more per week, but they have a “shorter-hours” movement, and examines the forces that drove the work week’s decline over time. We can gather all the workers who don’t have any rights in the workplace to establish a community or union to ensure the right of the worker. However, I know some companies have some policies to prevent employees do their business at the work time. Thus, not all companies are rough. Employees and employers have to talk together when they start working. If I were one of the workers who were not treated with respect and fairness, I would quit a job and go another place. The place which workers were treated fairly. Besides, I guarantee to observe any company policy such as work private communication, or personal expression while on business
Denying the Free-right workplace is not beneficial for employees, but cannot also be an improving …show more content…
According to the article “Warning: This Is a Rights-Free Workplace,” the author mentioned that “the supply of most kinds of labor is low, relative to the demand.” On the other words, the companies need some employees to work for them. In my opinion, people can quit a job or go well places to have more benefits and improving condition workplace. Moreover, I understand that workers have another option in a tight labor market. They need a job to support themselves, though, they know that they could be treated badly. For example, In the 1800s, many Americans worked seventy hours or more per week, but they have a “shorter-hours” movement, and examines the forces that drove the work week’s decline over time. We can gather all the workers who don’t have any rights in the workplace to establish a community or union to ensure the right of the worker. However, I know some companies have some policies to prevent employees do their business at the work time. Thus, not all companies are rough. Employees and employers have to talk together when they start working. If I were one of the workers who were not treated with respect and fairness, I would quit a job and go another place. The place which workers were treated fairly. Besides, I guarantee to observe any company policy such as work private communication, or personal expression while on business