War With The United States By Jesus Velasco-Martinez

Improved Essays
In the article “A Mexican Viewpoint on the War with the United States”, author Jesus Velasco- Martinez gave his argumentative input on what he believed was the truth behind the Mexican War. While it may seem that Martinez might have a bias perspective, being Mexican himself, he constructs his arguments with numerous facts and evidences to support his claims. Martinez based his statements on three important topics, which he believed in the end will help the reader understand the true nature of the Mexican War. Through more detail on “Mexico’s internal state of affairs during the 1840s… the problem of Texas… and the U.S. invasion of Mexican territory (“A Mexican Viewpoint on the War with the United States”, par. 1)” he was able to support his claims in order to convince the reader of his perspective. Starting off his argument, Martinez begins by shedding some light on Mexico’s previous governmental conflict. He informs readers of the countless dictatorships that Mexico suffered through. I believe …show more content…
He states that this particular topic was a sore topic for Mexico because they believe “the succession of Texas was illegitimate… (“A Mexican Viewpoint on the War with the United States”, par 7)”. Martinez basically acknowledges that from a Mexican perspective, what the United States was attempting to do was illegal. That further clarifies for him why Mexicans felt so strongly over the matter, and why they made statements concerning the need to use force if necessary. As a reader, his attention to the history surrounding each argument helps his case. Martinez gives the perspective of both sides, especially when it came to what Mexico perceived versus what the United States observed. It helps the readers to be able to formulate their own opinion on the matter. Nevertheless, Martinez’s thoroughness works to his advantage, helping convince the reader that his view is what’s actually

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Russo 1 James Russo Mrs. Fallman 27 March, 2017 Social studies P.6. Was the United states Justified in going to war with Mexico The United States had thought they were justified in going to war with Mexico after everything the U.S. has done to Mexico. The newly elected president James K. Polk was the one who led an army into the lands of Texas and California, stealing it from Mexico. President Polk believed in the Manifest Destiny of the U.S. and thought it was God’s plan for the U.S. to take Texas and California.…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Plan de San Diego Revolt was an occasion in the historical backdrop of south Texas that has for quite some time been known to students of history of Mexico and of the Mexican Revolution. Named for the Texas town where it was declared, the Plan called for Tejanos to ascend, reclaim Texas from the Anglos, and return it to Mexico . Benjamin Heber Johnson review, Revolution in Texas, approaches the Plan de San Diego Revolt from a totally alternate point of view. This is on account of, in his view, the brutality of 1914 and 1915 along the lower Rio Grande was really the appearance of more profound, more significant statistic and financial changes in the locale. These progressions agitate the predominant racial, social, political, and financial…

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    A Line in the Sand is a written documentary created by Randy Roberts and James S. Olson in which analyzes several aspects of one of the most famous events in Texas history, the battle of the Alamo. The battle of the Alamo was and has been controversial in that very little is known about what exactly happened during the siege. It was an event that caused a massive uproar during the Texas revolution and it also added more ire and will to succeed to the rebels at the time. The Alamo in blood in memory is the subtitle of the book and it implies that the event had left an imprint in Texas history and influenced the future and what Texas would become. In blood the Alamo will be remembered to some as a massacre, to others as a siege, and to others…

    • 1508 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Treaty of Guadalupe was signed February 2, 1848 to stop a war, and to fill the manifest destiny. The treaty was made to have peace between the land and to make sure everyone got their way. Now this treaty and everything that came with it had strict rules and it took a long time to create the treaty. People in America were already thinking about moving west in the early 1800’s. Manifest destiny made the treaty come true, and the treaty came true because of the Mexican American war, which was all started because of manifest destiny.…

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Was the United States Justified in Going to War with Mexico? As someone new to the world sets up something would it be right if someone just took it from them with force? This kind of event happened on April 25th, 1846 to Mexico, which where America took land from them through force. The event that triggered the beginning of the war was American troops patrolling an area North of the Rio Grande.…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Few times in history do we get to have a detailed and in-depth look into a major historical event like we do with Bernal Diaz del Castillo “Historia Verdadera de la Conquista de la Nueva España” or “The True History of the Conquest of the New Spain.” Written by a foot soldier alongside Hernan Cortes, “True History,” allows us to get a front row view to what can be considered one of the most fundamental encounters between European travelers and New World natives. Notably, it is not written is standard academic prose but rather an everyday vernacular, creating a more intimate relationship between Diaz and the reader while also removing the middleman and making the account more personal as a whole. “True History” itself chronicles the journey…

    • 948 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Polk’s Call for War In 1846, Congress received a message from President James K. Polk that discussed the difficult relations between the United States and Mexico and urged Congress to declare war against Mexico. He informed Congress of a recent massacre of American soldiers in an area that was believed to be owned by the United States, which convinced Congress to draft a declaration of war against Mexico. Even though American soldiers did perish at the hand of Mexican soldiers, I do not believe that the declaration of war was justified because the incident happened on land that both countries believed was rightfully theirs. Also, the events that followed the Mexican American War slightly indicated that one of the purposes of the war was…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Schwartz does however do an excellent job of highlighting the Spanish maneuvers and ability to take advantage of situations in the area. The choice to focus on the political climate of central Mexico as a leading factor to the success of the Spanish is demonstrated with massive amounts of convincing evidence. The shortcomings of the book are also mentioned by the Author in the introduction but states that the lack of evidence in existence is a major problem when studying the time period. The author states that sources from the time period demonstrate both class and gender bias due to the nature of the authors and societal expectations. While there are flaws in the book, the central argument is clear and supported effectively.…

    • 1599 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In a Declaration of War against the Mexican Government, the author sees the good of society as hinging directly on the rights of the individual. As it is, the author reflects on Mexico’s past, it’s continuing battle throughout history, all towards a single goal of independence, a nation state where the people would rule. Indeed, throughout the document a strong emphasis placed upon the fact that the government should exist for the people, not as some dictatorial regime. Thus, the authors views are clear: the rights of the individual equate to the quality of the society.…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It was only a matter of time until two growing nations would collide and fight over continental dominance. Land would cause a war that would determine the future and amount of power one nation would have over the other. Both the United States and Mexico sought to expand, grow, and develop into a prosperous country. But destiny only had plans of success for one. Those plans were meant for the United States of America.…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States was not justified in going to war with Mexico because, America invaded mexico ,American were stealing land from Mexico, and the American were disobeying Mexico rules when they were in Texas. During the year 1821, Mexico gained its independence from Spain. Before America took mexico’s land, it was about the size of the United States itself. Mexico stretched from Guatemala to Oregon . Texas tried two time to apply for annexation to the United States, both times Congress said no. in 1844, when James k. Polk, a strong supporter of the manifest destiny ( god’s plan the America extend its territory all the way to the pacific ocean) became president, Polk didn’t only want to annex Texas, but he also wanted California (Roden background essay).…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Americans, do you mean those bandits! The Mexican War started on April 25, 1846 near the Rio Grande river on foreign soil. Some events that led up to the war were the battles of Palo Alto and Resaca de la Palma. Was the United States justified in going to war with Mexico? America was not justified in going to war with Mexico, mainly because the Americans stole the Mexican’s land, forced their ideas of slavery, and infiltrated Mexican land.…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Jacob Ashcraft 24 October 2016 Texas Revolution Was Inevitable In one of the first major scholarly works on the Texas Revolution, historian Eugene C. Barker in 1928 described the conflict as a “clash of cultures.” Barker maintained that Anglo-Texans and Mexicans had little in common and, as a result, concluded that the rebellion could not have been avoided. Barker is correct in his statement about war being inevitable. Some believe it was because the Anglo colonists wanted overrun Texas and break away to become a part of the United States in the venture westward.…

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Such a problem could have easily been resolved if it was to have been taken as a diplomatic issue rather than as what Mexico saw this action. Mexico believed that the U.S. was taking away their lands, thus resulting in war due to the fact that they had to protect their lands. People did not agree with this war because although Texas would be admitted to the Union, it would be admitted as a slave state, and their was really no good in that, besides the fact…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Remaining neutral, she gives the reader a good chance to see where both sides are coming from but also giving many reasons to contradict the other so that no bias is influencing the reader’s opinion. Meant for any one, aware of this debate or not, she clears the fact this issue has been exaggerated and is indeed affecting…

    • 1514 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays