Short Essay: The War On Drugs

Improved Essays
The War on Drugs The War on Drugs is a term coined by President Richard M. Nixon. Was it a real war, in the introduction the question was asked “But if the deployment of soldiers is a requirement to wage war who is the enemy in the War on drugs?” The answer to the question is yes. In the 1980’s the US deployed Soldiers to South America in support of Counter Drug operations. The war on drugs begins in the 1970, with the intent to stop civil unrest and to provide assistance to our Soldiers returning from Vietnam with drug addictions. In 1980 Ronald Regan is elected as the 40th President with little progress in the War on Drugs. This changes in October, 12th 1984, the administration signs the Comprehensive Crime Control Act (CCCA) of 1984. The law changed federal sentencing, revised bail, and a little known addition in the law are stipulations for Civil …show more content…
After a defendant was found guilty verdict, the arresting or investigating agency kept the evidence. Subsequently, if items belonged to an individual found not guilty the items would be returned. However, this changes with civil forfeiture language that is included in the CCCA, in civil forfeiture cases the standard is much lower, if an item is deemed suspect the item can be confiscated. The legal test is the preponderance of evidence, not beyond a reasonable doubt as in a criminal case. In civil forfeiture assets returned if the owner proves innocence, as opposed to criminal forfeiture assets returned if the court determines not guilty. The civil forfeiture laws were added to the CCCA to provide the government a means to discourage illegal activity by providing law enforcement and governmental agencies a means to confiscate personal property without pressing charges. Effectively circumventing the Constitution specifically the Fourth

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    The article “TAKEN: Under civil forfeiture, Americans who haven’t been charged with wrongdoing can be stripped of their cash, cars, and even homes. Is that all we’re losing?” written by Sarah Stillman, she teaches at yale, a writer for the New York Times, and has been awarded multiple awards for her writing. Under the civil forfeiture or civil seizure the police are allowed to seize assets from drug deals or other criminal activities and use that money to supplement their department 's budget. Ms. Stillman makes a persuasive argument with rhetorical devices and when one analyzes the text it becomes apparent that she is arguing that some police departments budgets have been cut causing them to rely on these claims to make up for the lack of…

    • 1484 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Summary Of Drug Crazy

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The very mention of drugs summons demonic images: needles, babies addicted at birth, violence. No issue generates such a visceral reaction in people like the topic of drugs. In Mike Gray’s book “Drug Crazy: How We Got Into This Mess and How We Can Get Out,” his analysis of the drug war in America explores the mass hysteria surrounding addiction that was nourished with misinformation. Based on the history Gray has compiled, coupled with modern studies, the drug war appears to be a lost cause, now and into the foreseeable future. In 1909, Dr. Hamilton Wright was appointed as the third U.S delegate to the International Opium Commission at Shanghai and became “personally responsible for shaping the international narcotics laws as we know them today.”…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, an innocent owner has to prove their own innocence to get their seized property back. Law enforcement agencies can keep 80 percent of forfeiture proceeds if only one agency investigated the case and a 100 percent if more than one agency was involved.…

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The state and federal civil asset forfeiture laws, allows law enforcement agencies to keep or sell the assets and use the profits to subsidize their budgets. Different from criminal asset forfeiture, civil forfeiture, a property owner is not required to be found guilty of a crime or even charged to permanently…

    • 2228 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil Forfeiture is the loss of property to the government because the property is believed to have been associated with criminal activity. Under this law, civilians are not required to be charged with a crime to have their personal belongings seized by the federal government because it is an in rem action, meaning the trial is against their possessions, not the civilian personally. The members of the Office of the Law Revision Counsel of the United States House of Representatives should place restraints on 18 US Code § 981, commonly known as Civil Forfeiture, because it is an unconstitutional law that allows corrupt police officers to take advantage of innocent citizens, it has proven to be exceedingly expensive and difficult to regain possession…

    • 1404 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil Forfeiture laws allow the government to gain a person’s personal property with only “clear and convincing” standard of proof rather than the “beyond a reasonable doubt” standard of proof that is needed for a Criminal Forfeiture action. The property in question only needs to have a clear and convincing proof that it is connected to the alleged criminal activity presented. This “clear and convincing” standard of proof can be tainted as unlawful and therefore must be condemned. The Supreme Court has extended all the rights of the Fourth Amendment, the due process rights of the Fifth Amendment, and the Eight Amendment, in return has made them more frequently used by law enforcement. Does Civil Asset Forfeiture open the door for corruption?…

    • 149 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This law, along with the Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act, “eliminated judicial review of some deportation orders, required mandatory detention for many non-citizens, and introduced the potential for the use of secret evidence in certain cases,” and eventually started to executing deportation of legal permanent residents (Golash-Boza 377). Deportation of permanent residents were made possible under the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 if residents were convicted of “aggregated felonies.” This basically meant that if someone either shoplifted or possessed small amount of drugs, their judicial rights were taken away from them that they would not be granted with a judge for deportation. However, there were much more meaning to this than just what it seemed. Legal permanent residents who were “charged at any time during his or her stay in the United States” possible subjects of deportation (Golash-Boza 377).…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many people see civil asset forfeiture as a defective tactic used by the government. Civil asset forfeiture refers to a legal procedure by which the government is able to seize and ultimately forfeit the property of people suspected of wrong doing. The reason why people see this tactic as execrable is the fact that the government can seize property from people who were never convicted of or charged with a crime. Civil asset forfeiture is constantly seen as a way the government can victimize innocent people to make a profit on seized properties. Although this is a rather harsh tactic it is an absolutely credible tool used by the government and law enforcement agencies.…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    However, “this wasn’t, in actuality, a war on drugs,” it was a war on black people (74). Crack hit the streets rather suddenly. It was cheaper and easier to use than cocaine and happened to be “one of the most addictive drugs in the world” (71, 72). The irony, however, is that President Reagan and the CIA were behind the explosion of crack in America. It was all a big cover-up being used to pay for America’s role in the Contra War in Nicaragua (72, 73).…

    • 2110 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In reviewing other countries drug policies, Portugal has found an answer to the drug epidemic. Previously, Portugal was spending millions and getting nowhere. In the 90’s drug problems increased significantly. “In 1991, 4,667 people were arrested for drug offenses.…

    • 1596 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    War On Drugs Effects

    • 1275 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The War on Drugs directly impacts the life of almost every American. The program began as a fight against drug abuse and the spread of dangerous operations including and related to drug trafficking into American cities. Each new president, for the most part, has continued the programs of their predecessors. The naissance of the government’s anti-drug program began under the presidency of Richard Nixon. He set the ball in motion by classifying marijuana as a Schedule 1 drug and by directing his government agencies to target black social activists.…

    • 1275 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States stands to be the number one most frequently immigrated country in the world. The idea that draws so many people to this country every year is the American dream of opportunity. Much of the world population is struggling to survive each and everyday, living on nothing and fighting a continuous fight against drugs and violence. The idea that draws so many Latin American’s attention is the idea that an individual can cross the border and suddenly be capable of providing a prosperous life for themselves or their family. This is an opportunity that to some, is not one that can be easily passed over.…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    You 're driving home after a long day at work, you look in your review mirror and hear the sirens: a cop is pulling you over. Now you 're sweating because you have 24 grams of weed in the cup holder. The cop begins to search your vehicle; finds the marijuana, and let 's you go. This scenario, is an example of what would happen if drugs were decriminalized in America. Contrary to this, would decriminalizing drugs in America have a negative effect on the nation, or an adverse one?…

    • 1023 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The argument on whether drugs should be legalized has been going on for so long now. Some people say as an Americans we have the right to choose whether we want to do drugs or not. It is really hard to control the consumption of drugs, because people are going to do them whether they are legal or illegal. Other people say that the laws that are being enforced now are good to control drugs. “There will also be more unpublicized fatal and maiming crashes, more job accidents, more child neglect, more of everything associated with substance abuse”(M. Kendrecke).…

    • 1002 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    America’s war on drugs has spread across the globe. This, however, is not necessarily…

    • 1405 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays