Walmart Case Process

Improved Essays
Supreme Court Case Process This case was about the Supreme Court’s judgement of the allegations that Walmart was committing discrimination against women in salary, bonuses and training. In 2001, six female Walmart employees filed suit against them in US federal court and in 2003 the plaintiffs amended the complaint requesting that the court certify the case as a class action law suit and include all current and former female Walmart employees. They stated that the discrimination faced by the original plaintiffs was systematic in nature and affected all women employed by Walmart. This process requires the legal counsel to clearly “define a class” of individuals that are represented as the group. A judge must determine that they meet the requirements to …show more content…
Supreme Court threw out the largest sex discrimination lawsuit in American history with a 5-4 decision. The five-member court majority including Justice Antonin Scalia stated “that in order to sue as a single class, the women would have to point to a discriminatory policy that affected all of them”, and the court found they could not. The majority opinion of the justices ruled against the certification of the class and dismissed Walmart of the case.
There were four dissenting justices and included the court's three female justices. They all agreed the lower courts used the wrong certifying standard in the nationwide class. They also indicated the case should of gone back to the lower courts for a another review to determine whether the class could be certified using a stricter standard. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, writing for the dissenters, pointed out that a company-wide policy against discrimination can be undermined, by supervisors that have discretion, make decisions without standards, often on the basis of biases are even unrecognized by the supervisors themselves. A dissenting opinion is in difference to that of the majority opinion and is also referred to as a minority

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Hooters of America Inc. Vs. Annette R. Phillips 173 F.3d 933; 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 6329 Facts The defendant - Annette Phillips - had been employed by Hooters in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina. The plaintiff of the case was Hooters of America, Inc. When she was hired by Hooters Annette Phillips signed an arbitration agreement as part of her employment contract.…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the case of Sipuel v. Oklahoma, the ruling of the case proved that the southern states were starting to worry. Marshall took the case in defense of Ada Lois Sipuel, who was denied to Oklahoma Law School. The case went up to the Supreme Court and back down to Oklahoma high court “which ordered the University either to admit Miss Sipuel to the white law school or to open up a separate one for her…” The school in turn roped off a section of the school for black students. Marshall argued that the teachings she was receiving in a roped off area of the school were clearly not equal to the education the whites were receiving.…

    • 234 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Relief Sought: Petitioner filed suit against the Western Line Consolidated School District seeking reinstatement because the nonrenewal of her contract violated her First and Fourteenth Amendments. Issues: Givhan v. Western Line Consolidated School District addressed a teacher’s right to free speech under the First and Fourteenth Amendments. Facts: Bessie Givhan, a teacher in Mississippi’s Western Line Consolidated School, went into the principal’s office and expressed her opinion concerning the school’s hiring practices and policies. She believed that the practices were racially prejudiced, and after expressing her opinions, the principal claimed that the teacher made unreasonable and hostile demands. After the school year, her teaching contract was not renewed.…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The issue is the following: Are similarly situated college applicants being treated dissimilarly on the basis of race in violation of the 14th Amendment Equal Protection Clause? The holding is that similarly situated college applicants are being treated dissimilarly on the basis of race. The Supreme Court finds in favor of Abigail Fisher. The plaintiff has been injured by the actions of the defendant.…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Supreme Court has made various decisions that Liberals welcome with open arms, but one recent decision is not popular with Democrats. The Supreme Court agreed to reopen the case Fisher v. The University of Texas. The case is seem as the court case that will finally repeal 2003 case, Grutter v. Bollinger, and remove demolish the affirmative action program. Fisher v. The University of Texas was a Supreme Court case in 2013 that was sent back to lower courts. The court case deals with Abigail Fisher, a white middle-class female that feels she was passed over for less qualified minority students.…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Tucker Vs Walgreen Company

    • 1269 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Walgreen Company and EEOC v. Walgreen Company have the potential to affect the organization's stakeholders, reputation and legal responsibilities. While there will always be the need for a more equal world and more aware and kind-hearted human beings, society is starting to break the surface with understanding the crucial necessity for equality and the demise of discrimination. But, when a company does not flow with the change of society, then the consequences could possibly become detrimental to the business, its reputation, its income and employee/customer loyalty. Especially when the business resides in a state that has a diverse racial and cultural base. A more detailed description of these effects will be found in the following paragraph.…

    • 1269 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Garrett Vs Fisher

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages

    I represent the Respondent, and request of the court to affirm the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The legal standard is intermediate scrutiny. In order to disprove negligence, the challenged classification must serve an important state interest and is at least substantially related to serving that interest.…

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the Mock Supreme Court, I had the role of being a Justice, which made it my job to give the final judging in all cases involving laws of Congress, and the Constitution. I worked on the case Fisher v. University of Texas, rooting back to 1977 when Texas legislation made a law that required the University of Texas give admission to all high school seniors who positioned in the top ten percent of their class. When discovering the lack of diversity in the their college 's undergraduates and state populace, the University of Texas chose to change its previously unbiased racial acceptances . The new approach allowed all in-state students who graduated in the main ten percent of their high school classes admission. For the rest of the in-state…

    • 1436 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Concurrences and Dissents: Concurrence: Justice Goldberg begins by contradicting Justice Stewart’s argument that there is no right to privacy written in the Bill of Rights or established by previous cases, stating that the Court has “never held that the Bill of Rights of the Fourteenth Amendment protects only those rights that the Constitution specifically mentions by name.” In fact, the equal protection clause was not explicitly stated the Constitution, but was derived from the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment (Boiling v. Sharpe, 347 U.S. at 499, 74 S.Ct. at 694). The Court also emphasizes that the Due Process Clause protects certain rights that are “fundamental” to our notions of order and liberty.…

    • 1585 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Grutter Vs Bollinger

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Court, in a 7 to 1 decision authored by Justice Kennedy, found that the courts below gave too much deference to the university and failed to apply appropriately strict scrutiny. Adopting a tougher standard than either Bakke or Grutter, the Court said, "The reviewing court must ultimately be satisfied that no workable race-neutral alternatives would produce the educational benefits of diversity. If a nonracial approach could promote the substantial interest about as well and at tolerable administrative expense, then the university may not consider race." Justice Ginsburg dissented, finding that Texas satisfied the Grutter/Bakke standard, while Justice Thomas, concurring, would have overruled Grutter and banned all consideration of race in the admissions process.…

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Women At The Top Analysis

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the article, “14%: WHY SO FEW WOMEN AT THE TOP?” by Beverly Creamer, Creamer questions the nationwide stagnation of female cooperate executives between the years 2005 and 2011. She also correlates how gender roles have impacted Hawaiian corporate culture and how the legal system has both hindered and facilitated progress in pay discrimination. Creamer refers to a 2011 Catalyst survey of Fortune 500 leadership, asserting that for every seven executive officers only one is female, a 14% leadership rate. Likewise, according to the Hawaii Business Black Book, a record of the top 250 business and nonprofit organizations sees one woman for every five executives, a 20% leadership rate.…

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg has been a stalwart supporter of women’s rights and LGBT rights. Her rulings on cases concerning women's rights and as LGBT rights have continued the impression Justice O’Connor gave in her decision in Roe v. Wade that gender may indeed matter in rulings with this trend most likely going to continue with Justices Sotomayor and Kagan. She is considered as one the 100 Most Powerful Women and has spent time advocating for women's rights in the duration of her career. The question being is asked is “Does the gender of the Justices affect the ruling?” Women comprise one half, 50% of all human beings and American citizen so it begs the question whether men and women think different ways when it comes to judicial rulings…

    • 1711 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Judicial Restraint Essay

    • 1859 Words
    • 8 Pages

    As we know about the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court is made up of nine justices, coming from varied religious and ethnic backgrounds with six males and three females. Presidents nominate Justices for life tenure and they must be confirmed by majority vote of the Senate. According to NY Times article that has the title” Supreme Court Ruling Makes Same-Sex Marriage a Right Nationwide”, on June 27th, the US Supreme Court decided 5-4 that same-sex couples have a ‘fundamental’ right to marry, and thus overturned the laws of at least 17 states. In this assignment, I will discuss the arguments both for and against judicial activism vs. judicial restraint, using the 2015 gay marriage case of OBERGEFELL ET AL. v. HODGES, DIRECTOR, OHIO DEPARTMENT…

    • 1859 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Supreme Court.” Key Excerpts from the Dissenting Opinion | www.Streetlaw.org, landmarkcases.org/en/Page/434/Key_Excerpts_from_the_Dissenting_Opinion. Paragraph 3). The Thirteenth Amendment abolished slavery, so if someone have property or if someone is in poverty this won’t affect their freedom. “The white race deems itself to be dominant race race in this country”(Landmark Cases of the U.S. Supreme Court.”…

    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The case of Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commision was heard by the US Supreme Court December 5, 2017 and will be decided in 2018. The owner of Masterpiece Cakeshop, Jack Phillips, is a christian man that designs cakes in the store. David Mullins and Charlie Craig are a same sex couple that went to Masterpiece Cakeshop with the intent of buying a wedding cake. David and Charlie asked to order a cake for their wedding, but Phillips told them that he would not make the wedding cake because it denied his religious beliefs. Phillips still offered to serve them, but he refused to make a wedding cake for a same-sex marriage.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays