W. D Ross Prima Facie Duties Analysis

Great Essays
W.D. Ross’ Prima Facie Duties vs. J.S. Mill

Throughout life, you are often faced with conflicts. These conflicts may not be entirely avoidable, which could result in challenging choices that may need to be made. The conflicts may be present because of the choices that one made for themselves—the consequences of their own actions—or may be because of situations that arise from other people’s actions. Whatever the reason for the conflicts, one is put into a position that they need to arrive at a conclusion because of that conflict. W.D. Ross developed the idea of “Prima Facie Duties,” meaning “at first glance or on the face of it,” are duties that come from biological, psychological, or social aspects of life. These duties, Ross argues,
…show more content…
Mill was a Utilitarian, meaning that he believed that the best moral action is the one that maximizes the utility. Utilitarians believe that “an action is right if it satisfied the greatest good for the greatest number;” it benefits others and we determine the good. They also believe that the “end justifies the means,” “happiness is the only thing worth seeking” and that they often favor the minority (the lesser group). Additionally, as a Utilitarian, one often focuses on the consequences of someone’s actions. W.D. Ross was as Deontologist, which means that they believe that everyone is equal and they believe in the greatest good. As Professor Abbarno states in his lecture on March 31, 2016, “Deontologists do not focus on the consequences, but the right reason; how our intentions/ motives are lined up.” In my scenario, I personally would have to side with the reparation. I do believe that J.S. Mill would have agreed with me. As a Utilitarian, he believes that an action is the correct one if it is the most positive for a larger amount of people. For me to help another C.N.A with their group of residents throughout the shift, and have to make others wait, I would be helping more people trying to help others. I would be helping my fellow co-worker and the resident(s) who need more than a one-person to be of assistance. My resident may have to wait several minutes, but in the end, I would be available to them to help with whatever tasks they needed help

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Kant’s main idea is that the thought behind your actions is what determines if it’s wrong or right, not the outcome, he uses categorical imperative. So, the moral of your action is judged by the principal that provokes the action, not the outcome as I stated above. He calls these principles “maxim”. He says “the only acceptable maxim are those that can be defined as a universal law, because it is without exception” (pg.98). He uses an example of his view of morality of suicide.…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Conflict is a complex condition, it is both a mental phenomena as well as a physical sensation. Certain events in life are inevitable; one being the occurrence of conflict and that once one is faced with conflict, they will react. The two ways one responds to conflict is their fight or flight reaction, they will either face the conflict or attempt to escape it. Times of conflict also summons one to chose action vs apathy. To take action would mean to place other’s well being before one’s own, while choosing apathy is to make oneself indifferent to the needs of others for the sake of one’s own well being.…

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In John Stuart Mill’s influential book “Utilitarianism”, Mill introduces the belief that moral action is based upon the concept of utility, or how he explains it, the greatest happiness principle. It is this greatest happiness principle that defines Utilitarianism as the notion that the best moral actions are those that promote the most amount of human happiness. Actions that would be regarded as the least favorable are those that promote the opposite, unhappiness. The concept of Utilitarianism and that of Consequentialism are similar as both judge the moral value of an action dependent on its consequences, however each claim leads to different conclusions.…

    • 1497 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Often times the terms we don’t know who to fault when it comes to limits of legitimate law making. The terms “harm principle” and “legal paternalism” never come to mind when we are seeking these answers. This is remarkably ironic because both of those terms justify laws. In this essay i will go into depth on each term and provide examples of how they justify law and human morality. John Stewart Mill, inadvertently created the term Harm Principle in his essay On Liberty, where he defends extensive individual liberty.…

    • 1684 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    He also believes that things do not come down not right and wrong, they are simply a product of our social system and they must occur if it is the will of that system. In addition, I have some problems with Mill’s utilitarianism because it seems to have some open ends as I discussed before. For example, let’s use a current issue, immigration. With Donald Trump winning the presidential election, the issue of immigration is on everyone 's minds. According to utilitarianism; It would be moral to deport 30,000 people if 30,001 people were in favor of it.…

    • 2059 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The basic dictionary definition of freedom is the power to act without hindrance. That basic definition doesn’t have much to offer to the ideas of virtue, which is exemplary high moral standards. However, after studying how men such as Seneca, Epictetus, and Mill view freedom, the definition of freedom can be expound upon. The expansion on the definition of freedom leads to a stronger relation between freedom and virtue.…

    • 384 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mill defines utilitarianism as “actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness,” (484) He then begins to explain that happiness is the absence of pain, and pain is the absence of pleasure. He refers to utilitarianism as the Greatest Happiness Principle. Many people that disagreed with Mill’s definition of utilitarianism insulted his work by stating it as a “doctrine worthy only of swine,” (Mill 485). Mill responds to this attack by stating “...for if the sources of pleasure were precisely the same to human beings and to swine, the rule of which is good enough for the one would be good enough for the other,” (Mill 485). Mill responds to this insult by comparing human…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He has to choose on whether he should pull a lever to redirect a train from hitting five co-workers to another tract which it would hit just one worker. In this situation Alex has to use very careful reasoning to answering his choice. James Rachels simply stated, “The morally right thing to do in any circumstance is whatever there are the best reasons for doing so”. In answering this question he has to bring into consideration that he has to see all of his co-workers as equal and that no one is more important than the other. There would be no good reason for Alex to pull the lever, because in this case both would equal in death, and for him to choose to pull the lever would have him choose who he thought was more important.…

    • 1233 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Mill expresses the specifics of his views in his literary work titled Utilitarianism. Mill’s theory of utilitarianism measures the goodness of actions…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mill tells us in his Autobiography that the “little work with the name” Utilitarianism arose from unpublished material, the greater part of which he completed in the final years of his marriage to Harriet Taylor, that is, before 1858. For its publication he brought old manuscripts into form and added some new material. The work first appeared in 1861 as a series of three articles for Fraser’s Magazine, a journal that, though directed at an educated audience, was by no means a philosophical organ. Mill planned from the beginning a separate book publication, which came to light in 1863.…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    text Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals and Mill’s Utilitarianism we see both differences and similarities in Mill’s enlarged sense of justice and Kant’s kingdom of ends. To begin with, Kant’s approach to determining what is moral and what is not and some background on his philosophy is…

    • 1441 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Consequentialism is a normative ethics theory whereby the ends justify the means; in other words, the consequence of an action justifies the moral acceptability of an action of the means taken to reach that end. It provides criteria and rules for moral evaluation and decision making. In the situation of a moral dilemma, consequentialism is a form of guidance that makes a person choose an action that creates the maximum amount of good. The rightness or wrongness of an action is irrelevant, because it is the overall goodness of the consequence that matters more.…

    • 1281 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mill And Foucault Analysis

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Mill’s liberal view focuses on the Harm Principle that emphasizes that actions of individuals should only be limited once they begin to harm others. Mill states, “ the only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilised community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others” (40R). This view comes from a utilitarian perspective that which brings the greatest amount of happiness to the greatest amount of people. Mill tries to produce the highest form of liberty for each individual while maintaining order among the…

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He was called the most influential English-speaking philosopher of the 19 century. He applied utilitarian principles on his beliefs that he state was that the happiness of the greatest number of people in the society is considerate the greatest good for society. Mill created the principle of Utility where he said that an action is permissible if the consequences of those actions are best than the other actions available. His theory start with this principle and he adds that what is more important are the happiness and unhappiness that result from an action, and must be weighted and taken into…

    • 1647 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Early in his life, Mill was exposed to an exceptionally demanding education that was, for the most part, shaped by utilitarian principles. In fact, his father, James Mill, raised him with the aspiration that he would become the ultimate Victorian intellectual and utilitarian reformer. Deeply rooted in his past is the reason for promoting the liberty of individuals to act as they please, granted they don’t cause harm: to encourage “utility in the largest sense, grounded on the permanent interests of man as a progressive being” (Mill, 1859). Thus, abiding by the harm principle is appealing as it would contribute to the development of humanity, according to Mill. His book “On Liberty” was written when Europe was living under the influence of the French Revolution and the spirit of representative democracy was spreading.…

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays