Nuclear Deterrence Case Study

Decent Essays
International Relation’s Home Assignments Huang Peiyang--177IB03I
1
1. What are the vulnerabilities of mutual deterrence?
Mutual deterrence means the maintenance of peace between opposing sides by each having a sufficient strike capacity to deter the other from initiating armed conflict. The typical example of mutual deterrence would be the situation during the
Cold War where the U.S and the Soviet Union tried to avoid a hot war throughout the world because of fearing the possible threatening attack from the other side. That is to say, if the Soviets knew that an attack on the U.S would guarantee the equivalent destruction of itself, then the Soviets would be less likely to attack, and vice versa.
Even though the mutual deterrence could help
…show more content…
Therefore, even though they are included in the international order and should react when such nuclear war break out, the nuclear deterrence is simply not applicable to them and end up with a few states holding nuclear weapons deciding the world’s fate.
3. How useful are nuclear weapons in today’s world?
1 In system level, by applying the balance of terror, more than one county possess nuclear weapon could help to prevent the outbreak of global nuclear war as each of states will be afraid that other country could give the equal strike back if it launches the war yet lacks the ability to destroy the subject in the first strike.
Therefore, when facing conflicts, states will prefer to choose diplomatic way to negotiate and compromise, which actually provides a good opportunity to promote the global communication and cooperation. In that way, nuclear weapons have the deterrence function to maintain the world peace and stabilize the current international system. 2 In state level, nuclear weapons are the most power instruments for one country to defend its homeland security. By possessing nuclear weapons, a state may also enhance its international status and increase its citizens’ national pride,

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    He argues that it is not possible credibly deter another country from engaging in a conventional attack. As Thomas Schelling put it, a country could threaten to stumble into a war even if it cannot credibly threaten to invite one. So here, the logic was that the Soviet Union might attack NATO thinking that the United States would not respond. And so NATO in response put tactical nuclear weapons along the border, in part because they might be used even if the president did not want to use them. As Schelling also wrote, “If brinkmanship means anything, it means manipulating the shared risk of war.…

    • 2839 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Kuhn's Game Theory Analysis

    • 2436 Words
    • 10 Pages

    While Game theory, RAM, and OBM can only work if both players are acting rationally, Kuhn’s theory could help in developing new paradigms that deal with an irrational actor in the international realm. In 2006, the United Nations (UN) imposed sanctions against the Iranian government to deter and punish them for trying to obtain nuclear weapon and missile technology. The US government, as well as the European Union, have also imposed sanctions of their own with the hope of deterring Iran further. Analysts would argue that if Iran was acting in a rational manner, that it would submit to the sanctions, to restore its economy and reap the full benefits of compliance. However, despite the imposition of sanctions, Iran has continued to defy and move forward with its intentions, regardless of the economic losses sustained.…

    • 2436 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some skeptics argue that President Truman dropped two atomic bombs on Japan, which he knew was on the verge of defeat, to intimidate the Soviet Union in an already developing Cold War. Also, others believe that two atomic bombs weren’t necessary; instead, one was more than enough. However, facts prove that using the atomic bombs were the lesser of two evils. To prove such beliefs, I will use the six criteria for just war. The first criteria (legitimate authority) ensures that war isn’t waged for private ends, but for those of the majority.…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If one were to decide whether proliferation should occur simply from this information, the only rational choice would be to oppose the negative consequences. However, preventing proliferation undermines the powers of other nations. The prohibition of procurement or development of nuclear weapons for some countries, and the acceptance of stockpiling of nuclear arsenal for other countries cannot be justified. Furthermore, democratic nations such as the United States guarantee equality and liberty to their citizens, but hypocritically prevent other nations from developing nuclear arsenal that they themselves enjoy. In addition to reaping economic advantages and increased influence in international politics, these countries, through the development of nuclear weapons, will also gain a sense of security that they will be able to retaliate if attacked.…

    • 1380 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    People have different thoughts on if the U.S should retain or dismantle their nuclear arsenal. People that think it should be kept make arguments like how nuclear weapons help keep the U.S safe and how they can be used if there were to be any sort of war. On the contrary People that feel our nuclear weapons should be dismantled say our nuclear weapons cost too much to be kept and they make us seem hostile to other nations. So should the U.S keep its nuclear arsenal? Well there are lots of pros and cons to both sides of this argument.…

    • 1149 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Pyongyang blantly expressed he had no desire to stop his nuclear program so the only option for the safety of others is to make him stop by using coercion. I also think it would be a good idea to involve other states to help influence Pyongyang’s irrational behavior “geopolitical consideration also required the United States to bring China, Japan, South Korea, and Russia. These partners would enhance strength of coercive measures and inducements.”10 It is important that when the sanctions are imposed relatively quickly so it more likely to be successful and for future threats to be deemed credible. Sanctions that are targeted to weaken Pyongyang’s economy and military have to significantly hit the ruling class to make them give up the nuclear program. The ruling class is mostly party leaders, military officials and bureaucrats “the regime provides a wide spectrum of selective rewards to its ruling elites in return for loyalty, including residency and special housing benefits in Pyongyang, better and more food, and access to scarce goods such as luxury cars, jewelry, and electronics.”11 Focusing on the ruling class would be very influential because some even get revenue from the sanctions so once they stop receiving an incentive they will no longer want to support Pyongyang.…

    • 1688 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Yet by the time the time the rest of the world reacts to the cheater nation could be possibly too late. Also if the only thing that is keeping a nation from building nuclear weapons is the threat that other nations have the “know how” to build them and use them against you. What is stopping that nation from building nuclear weapons, because once they possess them they know they will not be…

    • 831 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    At the same time, one must remember that the formation of a United Nations was in the works. In order to accommodate such a large agreement, the U.S. had to compromise and side with nations, particularly the Soviet Union, that it did not necessarily agree with, in order to preserve power. The desire to put a complete stop to Japan’s attacks as well as to maintain a stance of power within the Alliance were both important goals the U.S. had to keep in mind when making the decision to drop the atomic…

    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Nuclear Deterrence Theory

    • 2178 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Nonnuclear deterrence was a significant problem for the United States in the 9/11 attacks. Both Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden were motivated to attack U.S. interests in part out of a low regard for America’s willingness to sustain bloody combat overseas. The apparent success of nuclear deterrence before 9/11 was conditioned by two factors: it was directed against the use of nuclear weapons by states possessing such weapons. Nuclear deterrence did not seek to prevent states from acquiring nuclear weapons; it solicited instead to prevent their use by holding hostage the enemy state’s targetable territory, leadership, industry, military forces, and cities. Nuclear deterrence moreover did not have to concern itself with threats posed by non-state actors armed with weapons of mass…

    • 2178 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nuclear deterrence is the prevention of attacks because of fear of retaliation. If there was a possibility of an attack, especially a nuclear attack it had to be stopped before it began. Deterrence at this level could only be achieved by a country with a powerful military, strong political and ideological beliefs, and most…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays