Voluntary And Involuntary Actions In Aristotle's The Nicomachean Ethics

Improved Essays
In the third book of his publication, “The Nicomachean Ethics”, the philosopher Aristotle elaborates on the arguments which he has presented concerning moral virtues, and invokes the concepts of voluntary and involuntary actions, choice, and responsibility to support his claims. The first segment within Book III of The Nicomachean Ethics concentrates on the conditions required for a person to either praise or blame another individual with regards to the actions that the other party has undertaken. On the aforesaid matter, Aristotle suggests that individuals should be praised when the hardships associated with their actions result in noteworthy successes; while on the reverse, also states that people should be blamed when their endeavours are …show more content…
In Book III of The Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle suggests that an involuntary act occurs when the motivating factor prompting the action stems from the circumstances afflicting the individual who is obligated to make a decision, and does not occur at the exclusive discretion of the person. Supplementary to the aforementioned notion, Aristotle also suggests that voluntary actions are those where the incentive inspiring the act are derived from the discretion of the individual themselves; albeit one who is aware of the circumstances afflicting them but does not act merely because of them. Central to Aristotle’s theory regarding the distinction between actions that are either voluntary or involuntary is the concept of intention as an agent that influences the decision-making process. Intention may be defined as the underlying motivational force that encourages an individual to act in a particular manner, and is often established by a combination of competing factors, namely the moral values which the individual possesses, and the circumstances afflicting the individual when they must make a choice. Fundamentally, whether an act is deemed to be voluntary or involuntary is primarily contingent upon …show more content…
Aristotle begins his address of this matter by making a distinction between those acts which are not voluntary, and actions that are involuntary; with the former referring to activities undertaken due to a person’s ignorance, and the latter referring to acts which are committed as a result of external compulsion. The distinction which Aristotle makes between these two types of non-voluntary actions alludes to the vital role which context plays in an individual’s decision making process, and emphasizes the importance of knowledge as a means for countering ignorant choices. Furthermore, to reinforce his philosophy regarding the pardoning of someone’s behaviour, Aristotle dedicates a large segment of section one to the description of ignorance, and how it possesses several dissimilar connotations. In Book III, the term ignorance is used as a means for determining which type of non-voluntary action someone has committed, and is divided into two separate denotations; acting in ignorance, and acting as a result of ignorance. When someone acts in ignorance, they are behaving in a manner that they do not truly understand and may thus demonstrate remorse for their performance, whilst a person acting because of ignorance is indifferent towards their conduct and is therefore acting from ignorance.

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Throughout Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle expands on what are the requirements for people to be considered good, or virtuous. He explains how political science is the ultimate science, since it deals not only with individual good, but with a societal good, which involves leadership in the most significant manner. For him, being virtuous is a necessary component of good life, which is one that is lived well, and may be perceived as “happy.” For practical purposes, however, in a world where one must interact with others, it is difficult to reach a consensus on the patterns of behavior that can be seen as virtuous. Nonetheless, Aristotle provides a most thorough structure to living virtuously, which he opens to be molded to the circumstances and…

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aristotle’s take on ethics is much different from any other philosopher. His view of ethics is very vague, do as the just man would do and for the same reasons as him. In saying this, Aristotle would reject Robert Nozick’s experience machine thought experiment. Though Aristotle’s ethics allow for less conflict that would come from a theory that contains rules, it is a problem that it is not very clear what one should do to be moral. Aristotle’s ethics are virtue ethics.…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Aristotle’s Account of Pleasure Introduction Aristotle emphasizes the importance of pleasure to human beings and demonstrates how we should live. The two accounts of pleasure in the Eudemian Ethics and the Nicomachean Ethics are broadly similar and agree with the supporting and opposing theories as well as on the nature of pleasure. The purpose of this paper is to best bring out the Aristotelian ethics in both the happiness and pleasure. The paper looks into the details the Nicomachean Ethics of these issues and goes into the details of his views in comparison with opposing views.…

    • 1159 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of Aristotle’s key interests in his Nicomachean Ethics was to determine what is happiness and how is it achieved. Aristotle concluded that happiness is a life lived in accord with virtue. Virtue, then, is the intermediary between deficiencies and excesses. Any character trait or act, by Aristotle’s reasoning, exists on a continuum between excessive and deficient – both of which are vices. Since both ends of any character trait or act is a vice, and the aim is a happy life which is achieved through adherence to virtue, then it must be that the intermediary position is the virtuous one.…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    p113-115). From this argument, it shows Aristotle has not taken into consideration that, people will have different views of what is right and wrong. As well as, not everyone will arrive at the same conclusion in every situation. Therefore, our function of reason is a convenient function but, reason may not be able to work out what is right when…

    • 1482 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To Aristotle, character is defined by what outcomes or results use desire, the different types of actions we are enjoined to or prohibited from taking, and the habits we may be advised to cultivate within ourselves. For instance, we may feel obligated to pursue a life of duty through some sort of service, or we may feel concern for the public. The Greek ethical proposes, “What is good for man?”. Aristotle believes that ‘eudaimonia’, or happiness, is good for man.…

    • 132 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Even though Aristotle was not a direct student under Plato at The Academy, he became and developed into one of the most famous Greek philosophers. After his years spent at The Academy, Aristotle developed his moral of philosophy in his book the Nicomachean Ethics. In this book, Aristotle explains the origin, nature, and development of virtues, which are essential for achieving the best and highest good that human beings are capable of, which is happiness. According to Aristotle, happiness is defined as to live well and do well, where virtue is key, but alone it is not enough. In order to be happy, you need full virtue across a complete life, which means that you need to regularly perform all the virtues.…

    • 1602 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Book III of Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics, he discusses the topic of involuntary, voluntary, and mixed actions. He states that “to distinguish the voluntary and the involuntary is presumable necessary for those who are studying the nature of virtue (140; Book III, Section 1).” He lays out how someone can distinguish between voluntary and involuntary actions, but mixed actions are a bit harder to distinguish. The topic of mixed actions raises the debate of whether mixed actions are really just voluntary actions, or if they are rather involuntary actions. I shall argue that mixed actions are really just voluntary actions.…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aristotle argues that certain things or conditions must be present to attain happiness, and in that “a certain sort of being-at-work of the soul in accordance with virtue” is required. I will argue that, for Aristotle, happiness cannot be the same as pleasure. However, we will see that happiness is importantly related to pleasure and pain, both in that the virtuous person comes to desire and finds satisfaction in acting virtuously, and in the sense that many of the virtues of character deal specifically with how we respond to our pleasures and pains. Since happiness is a certain way of being at work with virtues, Aristotle speaks of “virtues as pertaining either to thinking or to character”. Aristotle argues that all actions should point toward some good, as without virtue one cannot be happy, as the ability to be virtuous is unified within a good…

    • 1453 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This behavior is founded on middle ground-that is the virtue-situated between what is known as an ‘excess’ and the other being a ‘deficiency’, and the two also being classified as ‘vices’. Aristotle proceeds with certain examples relating to fear, anger, greed, etc. The two vices that were previously mentioned - the ‘excess’ and ‘deficiency’- pertain virtue based on morality residing with ‘passions’ and the actions of an individual (Aristotle, Bartlett, & Collins, 2012, p. 34). In terms of an ‘excess’, a person’s actions should not be acted out on. Aristotle’s philosophy also implies making decisions that are worthy of praise and admiration by…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In class, we have been discussing ethical theories as well as practicing placing these theories to cases. Ethical theories are a set of principles of right conduct and a system of moral values. The field of ethics involves systematizing, defending, and deciding different concepts of right and wrong behavior. In this day, philosophers are known to separate ethical theories into either metaethics, normative ethics, or applied ethics. I’ve chosen to focus on John Stuart Mill and Aristotle’s opposing argumentative theories which help teach me to analyze the cases provided to me.…

    • 1664 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the Nicomachean Ethics, we are provided with Aristotle’s philosophy regarding the nature of virtue. He aims at explaining what virtue is, how it is acquired, and how it is related to both happiness (eudaimonia) and friendships. Overall, Aristotle is addressing the questions of: “What is a human being’s telos (purpose)?” and “What is the highest good?” It is by answering these questions that we will be able to see how Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics is related to both Socrates and Epictetus’ philosophy, not to mention how it has contributed to my understanding of generosity, and virtue overall.…

    • 1649 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (41) Every person in this world feels emotions, we are not blamed for this because this is an occurrence that happens voluntary in nature. But we as humans are responsible for how we act in accordance to our emotions. Hence, Aristotle shows us that virtues do not constitute to our emotions or capacities, rather they are dispositions or habits of practice. For example, every human being feels the emotion of anger, which is within our nature.…

    • 2041 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The following paper argues in favor of Aristotle’s virtue ethics over Kantian deontology. In Kantian deontology, to be ethical is to follow one’s duty by acting on only the rules which one can at the same time rationally will that those actions become universal laws, while in Aristotelian virtue ethics, to be ethical is to develop and internalize virtuous habits until one fully becomes virtuous themselves. In turn, the ethical question of ‘What should I do?’ that deontology asks becomes ‘What should I be?’ with virtue ethics, placing emphasis on internal motivations rather than external actions.…

    • 1915 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aristotle and Kant have one major similarity. They both feel that the reasons behind an action are important in determining the moral worth of that action. I will demonstrate the differences between a person of Aristotelian virtue and a person who has Kantian moral worth in the following pages of this paper. I will also argue why Aristotle’s view is correct. The major differences between Aristotle and Kant are how they deem the reasons behind an action to have moral worth.…

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays