Vladimir Lenin's Oppression Of Socialism

Decent Essays
Vladimir Lenin is most well-known for his actions during and after the Russian Revolution. Long before the revolution, Lenin critiqued capitalism and postulated about socialism. He stated that capitalistic democracy brings no forward momentum, but is stagnate in an oppressive society. It was “Inevitably narrow and stealthily [pushing] aside the poor, and is therefore hypocritical and false...”2 Lenin’s true problem within capitalism was the oppression of the worker by the bourgeois. Lenin saw the continuation of poverty as the direct result of inherent issues within capitalism. Therefore, much of his trust in socialism’s superiority rested with its ability to first reverse these rules of oppression and subsequently instigate an equal society.3

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Both men viewed democracy as a way for bias to occur towards one side of their country, so they decided to control it themselves. In Lenin’s case, Russia had “Almost three years of civil war that followed, and The Bolsheviks were victorious and assumed total control of the country” (“Vladimir Lenin, BBC). Once this happened, as leader of the Bolsheviks Lenin made himself leader of Russia. While in control, Lenin was a cruel leader often punishing or taking goods from people for no real reason. For example, when the government was “Lacking funds or goods to exchange against grain needed to feed the Red Army and the towns, Lenin instituted a system of requisitioning grain surpluses without compensation” (Britannica).…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marx argued that the bourgeoisie controlled the means of production, wage labour and amassed majority of the wealth as a result, which equated to the power to dominate and define society. The opposing end, the proletariat, were constantly oppressed and left alienated because they maintained no power or ability to rectify their position within society. In addition, specifically within a capitalistic society, there was no opportunity for a meritocracy; so even if the proletariats were highly skilled, they remained pigeonholed with no chance for social mobility without a direct shift within the economic structure of society. When examining this multifarious relationship, Marx asserted in the Manifesto of the Communist Party, “The modern bourgeoisie society that has sprouted from the ruins of feudal society has not done away with class antagonisms. It has but established new classes, new conditions of oppression, new forms of struggle in place of the old ones” (Marx.)…

    • 1263 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He introduces the New Economic policy as a means of addressing the peasants’ empty bellies, with a caveat given to the Congress of Political Education Departments that this policy would bring capitalism through the gates so to speak. Lenin argued that the only way to prevent capitalism from winning out, the average worker must not only be literate but must have some higher level of culture. In this Lenin is trying to cure the ‘cultural backwardness’ of the Russian people (pp. 12). Eliminating this backwardness is Lenin’s means of disarming the threat of capitalism invited into the country by the NEP, that is the internal threat of Capitalism.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mccarthyism Vs Marxism

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In the Communist Manifesto Marx explained the historical class struggles that each society has come across since the beginning of time. Class resemblances are usually, the oppressor and the oppressed on opposite sides and classes with various orders of complicated arrangements (p.15). Marx’s believed that his society has not left the class antagonism from earlier times such as the Ancient Roman’s, however, enforced new classes with new conditions and struggles for the oppressed individuals, in place of the old policies (p.15). In Communist Manifesto Marx noted the two classes of his society were the bourgeoisie and proletariats (p.16). Quite simply, the bourgeoisie were the capitalists who were the enforcers and owners of the properties in…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marx believed that a violent overthrow of capitalism would lead to international socialism based on common ownership of land and capital. This would transform into an ideal state of communism, which is a worker-governed society based on the guiding concept “from each according to ability, and to each according to need” (Bolotta, Hawkes, Mahoney, Piper, 2002, pg. 58). This theory influenced many revolutions that would take place in the world. For example, the Russian Revolution in 1917, led by Lenin who said he has the philosophical heir to Marx (Schaff, 2009). Both Marx and Lenin are considered to be the two most important figures in the development of communism in the Soviet Union.…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Autocracy In Russia Essay

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages

    For the first time, workers who were once peasants now had cultural opportunities like evening classes, clubs, libraries, theatres, and mass entertainment, and in addition to that they became exposed to the political ideas of Social Democrats and Socialist Revolutionaries.4 These political ideas were captivating when the working class began to directly feel the crippling effects of modernization and the strains of WW1. Inflation had taken hold of the economy and as prices rose—sometimes tripled—wages remained unchanging, forcing a widespread hunger amongst the working class across the country. “The wretched conditions in which workers lived and their pitiful wages heightened their sense of separateness not only from the government but from privileged society in general,” and made the socialist ideas of regime change all too alluring. The government had a hope of introducing modernization while still keeping a firm hand of control over society, yet the effects of modernization which consisted of industrialization, urbanization, internal migration, and the introduction of various new social classes only served to further dismantle and wash away the autocratic foundations of the Tsarist regime.2 This collapse in the autocratic foundation through a crisis in modernization was the first step to allowing Lenin and the Bolshevik party to eventually gain control of the Russian…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The October Revolution: Coup or Social Uprising? Historians along the century have questioned the veracity of the narrative the Bolsheviks fed to the people of Russia and the rest of the world. These historians claim that the communist party has distorted the facts of said revolution to control masses during the Soviet reign. The overthrow of the Provisional Government in October 1917 was both a Bolshevik-engineered coup d’état and a popular revolution. Chroniclers have debated this statement owing to the fact that said people come from different socio-political backgrounds and the varying historiographies of individual authors.…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Through the ideas of capitalisms, the classes became unbalanced and unfair; the bourgeoisie lived easily with little work while benefitting from the sweat and blood of the middle and lower class, who were mercilessly exploited. For example in 1913, peasants were rewarded for their labor in only one-third of all Russian land. In the other two-thirds, peasants had to work for landlords and received only a small fraction of the profits. However the Bolsheviks believe in communism, in which each person works and is paid according to their abilities and needs. Through this philosophy, every person will be sure to have enough to live comfortably, while also making sure that everyone is equal.…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Marxism The Crucible

    • 1524 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Imagine living in a world where no human oppresses another. Imagine living in a world where no one is poor and no one is rich. Imagine living in a world where the social class system is non-existent. Karl Marx, a 19th century philosopher, foresaw the image of this apparent communist utopia forming in every society; he expected the maltreated working classes to fight back against those who have immense, misused power. He believed that material possessions have a powerful enough influence on our lives to be considered the sole reason of historical change.…

    • 1524 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Was Lenin Justified Essay

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Lenin’s mass terror eliminated many political groups as well as the bourgeoisie. Bourgeoisie was the middle class who disliked the idea of a completely communist government. For Lenin’s ideal country to be implemented, all enemies of the proletariat and idealists had to be eliminated ( Melgunov 198). Lenin’s decisions benefited no one other than himself. His harsh policies came with detrimental effects.…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During his brutal reign, he further developed Marxism-Leninism. To a certain degree, it is impossible to consider Stalin’s interpretation of Marxism-Leninism and its influence on…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marx’s Bushy Mustache When people think about Karl Marx, they think about a mustache-twirling villain, but Marx’s mustache was too bushy to twirl. Marx is commonly misconstrued as a villain when in reality he was just a man who shared his thoughts. Karl Marx caused a paradigm shift in the way people think about the social economic structure of the world, created and led the communist revolutions and indirectly led some of the most influential revolutions in history. Karl Marx changed the way people thought about social economics, the social class system, and capitalism forever, by opening people’s mind to a new way of thinking. “Marx’s philosophy has led to fruitful thought in areas other than social and economic thought” (Barry 4).…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Although the leaders of the Bolshevik revolution aimed to create a communist society in the USSR based on Marxism, however due to several reasons, the society (and state) they formed was different from the one envisioned by Marx. Marxism, in essence, is Karl Marx’s political ideology whereas communism is a society (and a political system) based on that ideology. The research paper explores this thesis by a comparative analysis of Marxist doctrines and its application as carried out by Lenin and his successors in the ‘Socialist’ USSR. In the above context, central questions that would be addressed would revolve around whether the communists were able to establish a classless society in the Soviet Union? Was the formation of a communist society…

    • 2903 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1848, Karl Marx and Fredrick Engels published ‘The Communist Manifesto’ that was aimed at presenting the arguments, goals, and platform of Communism. The publication was a commissioned work that was intended to articulate the objective and platform of the Communist League, an international political party founded in 1847 in London, England. The authors point out the benefits of communism and the need for its application in the future. Besides, the manifesto was a proposal reading stabilization of the class structure in the society without conflict. The authors argue that historical developments have been impacted by the class struggles, with the rich battling with the poor and the exploitation of one class by another.…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Karl Marx's Philosophy

    • 1291 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Karl Marx began a philosophical revolution. Although rejecting the legacy of philosophy completely, he spent his life developing a radical idea which focused on the material world and the economic forces which drive it. Central to his thought, is that our consciousness is determined by our material reality and that history proceeds from material change. Essentially, class struggle is the engine of history, and has been responsible for slavery, feudalism, and modern capitalism. Marx’s historical narrative is teleological.…

    • 1291 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays