Machiavelli Role Of Politics In The Prince

Superior Essays
What makes a book stand the test of time, and also remain as a notable perspective within politics; having been written over five-hundred years ago? As for Machiavelli’s The Prince, scholars and politicians continue to find themselves drawing back to many of his perspectives on politics, and the qualities a good ruler. His insights on political leadership has sparked much debate over time, which is exactly why many continue to pursuit an understanding on his viewpoints, and their applications to today 's modern world. Throughout his novel, Machiavelli touches on multiple aspects of different qualities within a prince, and attempts to construct a layout of what is both effective and successful. After reading through the entire piece, the major …show more content…
Within many of the chapters, human nature is described through the qualities of men and their overall patterns of traits and actions. Besides the description of a prince, Machiavelli additionally goes on to describe problems among men that surround the prince and their threatening qualities. Early on, in chapter nineteen, he makes an important statement that “...when neither their property nor their honor is touched, the majority of men live content…” (Machiavelli 63). This is an important statement to analyze, mostly because it implies a lot about the common interest of men. Already stating that men are ungrateful, deceptive, greedy, etc, Machiavelli goes on to say that men are content as long as their honor and property are never to be touched. This honor that they seek to possess, eventually transcends into a greed for power and many other qualities that he states further on. It is obvious that he finds many problems regarding the trust of one another, and constantly looks at how these negative traits stand as a danger to the prince. It could be said that Machiavelli saw men as being wicked a lot, or he could have simply been looking through a certain part of society that only pertains to the danger of a prince. For he analyzes parts of human nature in order to guide, and provide those with advice when regarding a …show more content…
Machiavelli was able to construct a detailed aid for those who may come into power, and provided useful instructions throughout each message. Obviously, Machiavelli found a good amount of importance when it came to describing fortuna & virtu, human nature, and the importance of distinguishing whether to be feared or loved. Machiavelli 's key insights continue to remain prevalent amongst those who govern, and also remain as notable instructions throughout

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Machiavelli’s intentions are clear from the very beginning, the dedication of the book to Lorenzo de’ Medici, the ruler of Florence. The Prince is not particularly hypothetical or abstract, its prose is transparent and its logic incomplex. These attributes underline Machiavelli’s desire to provide coherent, efficient understandable advice. In his book, “The Prince,” Machiavelli stated that a good ruler should not only mirror previous great rulers and seek advice when needed “the prince must read histories and in them study the deeds of great men; he must examine the reasons for their victories and for their defeats in order to avoid the latter” (The prince, XIV), but he should also devote himself to the military operations and preserve power distinctly, and not to mention defeat or eradicate possible threats such as political conflicts and potential enemies.…

    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Machiavelli and Socrates Would Not Support the Same Prince While both Socrates and Niccolo Machiavelli grew up in times of political turmoil and economic instability, Socrates would not be supportive of Machiavelli’s concept of a good prince. Their concepts of an effective ruler are completely different – the extent of their similarities are their experiences with political fragmentation and war. Both aim to establish a long-lasting government, but Machiavelli believes a ruthless ruler without regard to morality is needed, while Socrates would suggest a virtuous ruler is vital to establishing a stable government. In The Prince And the Discourses, Machiavelli articulates what makes a good ruler and provides guidelines for how they should rule.…

    • 1534 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In one section of the article, Vincent Barnett discusses some of the alternative ways that Machiavelli’s The Prince can be interpreted. One interpretation was that Machiavelli possibly intended for his writing to be satirical, because certain facts, such as how Machiavelli had a family, refute his statement from the pamphlet that he believes all humans are evil. Also, it is possible that Machiavelli didn’t actually agree with the ideas in his writing, but he only wrote those things to gain favor from the leaders of his time. These are just possibilities, but knowing about Machiavelli’s life and his situation are important in order to understand his motives for writing The Prince. Just like Machiavelli, present-day leaders and authors make…

    • 186 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Niccolò Machiavelli is smart and a strategic author. There are many ways on how to interpret his famous work, “The Prince”. It is intriguing that Machiavelli did not provide a title for the book. In doing so, Machiavelli shows his strategic writing to challenge the reader. To read the book and accept it in a literal sense is questionable.…

    • 1888 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The words he uses to describe men do not have the most positive meaning, he sees men as people who are not easy to control or govern, people who are not trustworthy and do not deserve to be treated nicely. Machiavelli only focuses on men and princes throughout the book and therefore his view on human nature is based only in men. He has a very harsh view of them as he also mentions “which men, wretched creatures they are”, this quote adds to the view of machiavelli in which men are bad and not worth much. This view on human nature that Machiavelli has, specifically about men leads him to come up with how a prince should govern his territory and the proper way to govern them, he bases his opinion on they way he sees men.…

    • 2016 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    It appears that Machiavelli’s purpose in writing The Prince was to eventually gift it to Lorenzo the Magnificent as a means of securing good favor from him. As to why he chose to write a novel as opposed to the more commonplace tribute of either gold or some other finery, the most feasible conclusion is that Machiavelli wished to indirectly guide Lorenzo in how he thinks his job should be done. Machiavelli wanted Lorenzo to implement the strategies detailed in The Prince so that Lorenzo may eventually garner even more power and prestige; in the hopes that one day Lorenzo would repay Machiavelli’s kindness by relieving him of his suffering and misfortune. In terms of more noble goals, Machiavelli hoped that the Medicis would use his knowledge…

    • 139 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lao-Tzu Vs Machiavelli

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Next, one who is feared. The worst is one who is despised.” (207) Machiavelli insists that though to be both loved and feared would be best, being the two at once is impossible, thus “it is much safer to be feared than to be loved when one of the two must be lacking.” (227) On the subject of being despised, Machiavelli fest strongly that a Prince should avoid being considered that at all costs.…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The prince’s subjects would be more willing to dedicate themselves to the prince if they love him. When someone fears a leader, they go along with the leader’s decisions not because they want to, but because they are afraid to do anything different. This will cause the subject to not give as much effort or dedication into this decision because they may not agree with it. However, if the subjects love their prince or leader they will be more willing to help with and achieve the prince’s decision. This love of the prince will also allow him to remain in power easier.…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Moreover he symbolizes the carelessness of the suitors’ actions, as if they can be so easily justified by the hurt egos of the men. Likewise, society plagued much of the natural world for its own personal interests.…

    • 1165 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If he must choose one quality, M claims that the prince is better to be feared than loved, due to people’s human nature. Human nature, according to M, is unpredictable, selfish, and fearful; in other words, in times of danger, people will most likely to flee from danger and abandon their ruler. If the prince is loved, people, who do not have strong loyalty towards the prince, will turn their backs; however, if the prince is feared, loyal citizens will attempt to fight against the vicissitudes and protect their country and the prince. 6. In Chapter 18 Machiavelli discusses the need for a prince to have two natures: a fox and a lion.…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To answer the question that was addressed who should fear that, it is clear that by these quotes that the prince is the one that needs to be feared and his subjects are the ones who should be in fear. An important factor that needs to be noted is that he believed in a negative anthropology and people are basically no good and he believes that fear should be used to keep the subjects in check. This also being his way to justify that being feared is more effective than being loved. Thomas Hobbs in the Leviathan had a similar take on the way fear is being…

    • 1077 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the written work “The Prince” by Niccolo Machiavelli the author elaborates on how a prince can only be a strong leader if he engages in duplicity. Machiavelli focused on a more realistic and immoral strategy to keep the people of his time unified, realpolitik a system based on practical rather than moral considerations. The author, Niccolo Machiavelli, goes through great depths to explain why it takes rulers who are “cruel, dishonest, duplicitous, and manipulative.” There are many great examples to prove his ideology, however, the writing is very subjective and bias as Machiavelli does not give a rebuttal to the different kinds of ruling. He writes “The Prince” after the current leading family of his time falls in order to keep the stability…

    • 1637 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The lion cannot protect himself from traps, and the fox cannot defend himself from wolves. One must therefore be a fox to recognize traps, and a lion to frighten wolves.” Machiavelli uses this analogy as an attempt to teach the masses how to embrace their human significance. Machiavelli wrote The Prince at a time where there was political unrest and confusion in Italy, which is why it can be interpreted in many different ways, such as a political satire or epilogue of his political views; however, while the content may be confusing the true meaning of The Prince is to be understood as a satire. Machiavelli is continuously sarcastic through out the course of the novel about the government standings and the changing world.…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Thus, the coexistence of The Prince and the Discourses is conceivable. I elaborated on various positions in academia and the way in which these positions can be in conjunction. One position I argued was The Prince as a deceptive tool to bring the collapse of the leader so the republican regime in the Discourses could transpire. A further position views the regime in The Prince as a pre-condition for the final goal of a lasting republic from the Discourses. Moreover, direct textual comparison reveals parallels in writing styles and themes, which supports stronger co-existence.…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Machiavelli argues that too much compassion brings along dire consequences, as too much mercy allow disorders to take place, thus justifying acts of cruelty, on occasion, in order to prevent such outcomes from happening. Therefore, acts of cruelty may also be used to protect the people. This leads to Machiavelli’s answer to his famous question, arguing that while one hopes to be both feared and loved, it is nearly impossible to carry out such high standards. Being feared is more preferable, as those living under the ruler’s feared reputation are protected from acts of evil. In addition, Machiavelli argues that men are “ungrateful, fickle, pretenders and dissemblers, evaders of danger, eager for gain”, which should dissuade princes from too much compassions, as they will be taken advantage of from the…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays