Register to read the introduction…
The two main keys are factors of the business victory i.e. Leadership Skill and Efficient Management. Proper blending of these two factors leads to a business in the track of success. An Organizations success is in the hands of its leader. So we can say that a leader is a person one who leads the entire business into one point (the one point means the attaining the business goal).So the responsibility of the leader is very high in the company because he/she is the driver of the company his/her strategic decision must be accurate and prompt otherwise it will negatively affect the company. For this reason a good leader needs some good leadership skills and proper management qualities are essential to lead an organization. The important leadership skill that is essential for a good leader was explained below:
• A leader must be a motivated person.
• A leader must be a confident person.
• A leader must be humble honest and loyal to the organization.
• Good commitment is a necessary factor for good leader.
• Easy to handle a critical situation.
• Appropriate decision making power at right situation …show more content…
Form the above understanding it says clearly there is no strategic management without good leadership both are correlated. So Every organization overall performance is the mixture and the proper blending of the strategic management and the leadership skill. If the management level of the organization is not working under the plan formulated by the Strategic level means if they violated the plan, the leader’s responsibilities is properly monitored and evaluate the performance of the concern organizations management department. So a leader is the guide to lead the entire organization to one point i.e.to attains the desired organizational …show more content…
It gave the managers strong focus on their development plan and leadership. There is a form of political corrosion that debilitates leadership not as an unusual, typical or occasional event. It does not mean that there is a contradiction between what leaders required and what actually happens. However it means the fact that subordinates must comply with leaders request for their own benefit. In Virgin Atlantic subordinates are supposed to do what their want them to do however some of their wishes could not be fulfilled because of the lack of resources. The leadership styles followed in Virgin Atlantic is not to be considered as poor. The leadership styles introduced by Virgin have many objectives beyond their HR operations. The introduced leadership development program with the intension of increasing their profits by 7%. They decided to send 120 managers of their personal development workshops at a cost of $2000-$3000 per head. These are series of programs that aimed at building the leadership traits of Virgin into management behavior. This program was a success and it helped in building individual personal development program and developed each group of six managers who monitored their own growth and monitored other employee’s progress. Virgin Atlantic plans to review its annual development programs and implement further programs every year. It further extends its leadership review
• A leader must be a motivated person.
• A leader must be a confident person.
• A leader must be humble honest and loyal to the organization.
• Good commitment is a necessary factor for good leader.
• Easy to handle a critical situation.
• Appropriate decision making power at right situation …show more content…
Form the above understanding it says clearly there is no strategic management without good leadership both are correlated. So Every organization overall performance is the mixture and the proper blending of the strategic management and the leadership skill. If the management level of the organization is not working under the plan formulated by the Strategic level means if they violated the plan, the leader’s responsibilities is properly monitored and evaluate the performance of the concern organizations management department. So a leader is the guide to lead the entire organization to one point i.e.to attains the desired organizational …show more content…
It gave the managers strong focus on their development plan and leadership. There is a form of political corrosion that debilitates leadership not as an unusual, typical or occasional event. It does not mean that there is a contradiction between what leaders required and what actually happens. However it means the fact that subordinates must comply with leaders request for their own benefit. In Virgin Atlantic subordinates are supposed to do what their want them to do however some of their wishes could not be fulfilled because of the lack of resources. The leadership styles followed in Virgin Atlantic is not to be considered as poor. The leadership styles introduced by Virgin have many objectives beyond their HR operations. The introduced leadership development program with the intension of increasing their profits by 7%. They decided to send 120 managers of their personal development workshops at a cost of $2000-$3000 per head. These are series of programs that aimed at building the leadership traits of Virgin into management behavior. This program was a success and it helped in building individual personal development program and developed each group of six managers who monitored their own growth and monitored other employee’s progress. Virgin Atlantic plans to review its annual development programs and implement further programs every year. It further extends its leadership review