Government Gone Too Far Essay

Superior Essays
Americans have been questioning whether government surveillance has passed the limits of the right of privacy. The controversy is set whether the violation of the right of privacy is in exchange for security. In other words, is the government really providing security or control the citizens? Is it really to benefit the people or the government? With that questions, more questions are made like: Is the government correct on doing what is being done? The discussion here is; Has the government gone too far? The answer would be that yes it has, and it also brings danger to the citizens.h
The government has many points to its favor to surveil the whole country. The government surveils everywhere and everyone. Even the fact of what the world lives today gives the government more reasons to supervise the people in a whole another level, which mean violating the right of privacy. For example, according to Greiman the Unites States have been taking extra precautions to secure the country since the incident of September eleven of two-thousand and one. This incident
…show more content…
Other than putting people in danger the right of privacy is being violated in many ways. People cannot deny that the government is brilliant at doing this and that in fact that there is good advantages, but the citizens’ rights are being violated in its totality. The discussion here is: has the government gone too far? The answer is totally, and there is no doubt. Paying so much money, going through so many information and collecting so much information shows that the government has gone beyond their power. In a nutshell the government has gone far beyond of what their power allows them too. It said that is for the benefit of the country but who knows, maybe it is or maybe is not. Everyone has an opinion and anyone can say what they want about the government’s ways, but that that there is a violation of right of privacy there

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Government introduces you to a precedent that has to do with DLK’s case because in this case they intended for their info to be private, but the government used something that goes above the five senses so you would need a warrant to use it. This is important because in DLK’s case he intended for his info to be private, but since the government used a thermal imager without a warrant just like the bug in the Katz case, they found out he was growing marijuana in his home. No one else would want someone else to find out something that they are doing if it is private. While some may argue that the government can do that without a warrant if they are suspicious, no one would want their private info to be found or heard by the government. In conclusion, the Government should not invade your privacy unless given a warrant to do…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Article #1: Sinha, G. Alex. " NSA surveillance since 9/11 and the human right to privacy." Loyola Law ReviewWinter 2013: 861+. Academic OneFile. Web.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The NSA, or National Security Agency, is responsible for monitoring on a global scale. They collect, analyze, decode, and translate potentially "dangerous" information from foreign intelligence. The NSA has the ability to track phone numbers, set up fake Internet cafes, spy on foreign leaders cellular phones, tap into video conferences, monitor texts, access web history, much, much more. The people -rightfully- feel things have gone too far in the name of safety. After much outrage and voicing among the people, the president addressed the issue.…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dbq Privacy

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The rapid advancement of technology has allowed surveillance to be performed on an unprecedented scale. Individuals, however, should not be subjected to unwanted spying. According to Harvard Law Review by Samuel D. Warren and Louis D. Brandeis, privacy is “the right to be let alone,” meaning freedom from all forms of surveillance and privacy-invasive behavior. Privacy protects the reputations of individuals. It also protects minorities from unwanted searches and accusations.…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Steamboat Springs Colorado May 2017 police took a young man who threatened his parents into custody before he could act on his words because people were watching him through cameras and his phone. Sometimes the government spying could be down right creepy but in the end he security could help save more lives in the future. The government should spy on its citizens to keep the community…

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Spying In 1984

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Any government has absolutely no right to spy on their own citizens. Whether is the United States, or the totalitarian government of 1984, Spying on innocent citizens should not be permitted. the act of spying is limited by law, threatens democracy, and illegally obtained evidence can be used to incriminate someone unfairly. It has been 230 years since the United States constitution was signed, yet the government still follows the law of the land.…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to the United Nations, privacy is basic human right that should be protected by law. The United States Constitution also implies a right to privacy in the Fourth Amendment. Recent laws passed by the government have raised questions about whether the government’s actions infringe upon a citizen’s right to privacy. The USA Patriot Act was the first of many laws that increased the powers of government organizations such as the NSA and the FBI. The law allowed these agencies to access private records of US citizens without the need of a warrant or judge’s consent.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The surveillance program is effective with preventing terrorist attacks, but this violates the Fourth Amendment right because they are collecting data from everywhere and everyone around the country. According to the News Team staff of cfr.org people are starting to revolt against these outraeous and unlawful actions. Judge Richard J. Leon said “ surely such a program infringes that degree of privacy, that our founding fathers enshrined in the Fourth Amendment” (www.cfr.org). After, the exposure of the NSA in the mid-2013 American citizens have started to protest against these unlawful actions and development movements to protect their right of…

    • 1280 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Limited Government Essay

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In contrast, opposing evidence indicates that the government is overreaching its power by playing too direct of a role in people's lives. While both sides of the issue have valid points, the claim that the government should be limited is the strongest position, the position supported by the preponderance of the evidence cited in the…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are many disputes debating on whether the Patriot Act should be legal or not. The Patriot Act’s purpose is to “[make] it easier for the government to obtain the orders and allowed for greater coordination among intelligence agencies and law enforcement”(Philadelphia, par 14). But at what point is obtaining information from the American citizens too far? The issue for this debate is does the Patriot Act violate the people's rights. This debate has been going on since 2001 as some view the Patriot Act as unconstitutional while others believe it’s protecting the safety of the people.…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The recent changes and precedents in privacy, search law and technology adequately achieve a balance between individual and collective rights. Every individual should know the limit to their right, leading into the idea that citizens should be well know-ledged about the rights they are guaranteed. This does not mean memorizing the Charter, but it does mean knowing that the rights may be infringed under specific circumstances with a justification. An individual should be aware as to when their right is no longer applied or does not come into significance. The government also has some rights on their own but one of them does not include conducting unreasonable searches, as this may violate privacy rights.…

    • 1305 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    "The Fourth Amendment states: “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” The NSA hacking, wire-tapping and spying on civilians goes directly against the Constitution. It puts them at risk of unreasonable searches and seizures without probable cause. This issue is about constitutional privacy rights of U.S. citizens and how it relates to national security. When is the government going too far to protect us?…

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Everyone knows that the government has the most power, but should they be allowed to use surveillance to keep things in order, or are they abusing the power that they are given? The government abuses their power because they think nothing is going to happen to them, For example, in December 2005 the government tapped into other people's phones and listened to their conversations without a warrant. Every time the government needs to use the power they have, they need to follow protocol before taking action. The government's control on surveillance is more harmful than people know.…

    • 374 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Freedom Vs Security

    • 1805 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Dan Gandio (2012) claimed that different types of people tend to enjoy more or less freedom than others for example the bourgeoisie enjoy more freedom than the lower class and this has lead to issues such as slavery, racism, feminism, same sex relationship bans etc. Secrecy and surveillance is a way of controlling individual freedom and blocking the public access to information can also limit freedom Bbc.co.uk (2014). An example of this was when the US National Security Agency (NSA) was collecting the telephone records of tens of millions of Americans from Verizon on a daily basis. They also accessed the servers of nine Internet such as Facebook, Google, Microsoft and Yahoo to track online communication. This was a violation of the privacy of their citizen’s privacy and justifies the point stated earlier.…

    • 1805 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Society has always thought that it had the freedom and privacy it was enlightened to have in the United States of America. Most of society has not been enlightened with knowledge that they are most likely being watched all the time. Just like in the novel 1984, by George Orwell, the citizens are always being watched and have no privacy for themselves. Privacy is something that individuals greatly value but do not truly consider until it is taken away. The totalitarian government 's need to control, manipulate, and subvert the rights of its citizens in 1984 mirrors the United States government operation today.…

    • 1121 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays