Violation Of Law

Improved Essays
In this scenario, the oath that I took to uphold the law was seriously violated. Instead of being patient and allowing Mr. Lincoln to actually break the law by conducting one more hand to hand gun or weapons transaction; I decided to take matters into my own hands by falsifying a report. I claimed to have witnessed Mr. Lincoln violating the law during the same time that he was violating the law but somewhere else by committing an even worse crime. The facts that another team member from the surveillance team was on shift that night as well as other evidence and witnesses, claiming that Mr. Lincoln was involved in a double homicide, seriously leaves me with few options. By fabricating evidence against Mr. Lincoln I violated his civil rights under due process of the law. “Fabricating evidence against or falsely arresting an individual also violates the color of law statute, taking away the person’s rights of due process and unreasonable seizure. In the case of deprivation of property, the color of law statute would be violated by unlawfully obtaining or maintaining a person’s property, which oversteps or misapplies the official’s authority” ("FBI — Color of Law," n.d.). This is a clear violation of the …show more content…
“The right of due process and the prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment in the Eighth Amendment are based on the principle that human beings deserve to be treated as ends and never as mere means, never as objects, no matter how heinous their crimes” (Delattre, 2011). Not only did I lie, I also created an alibi for Mr. Lincoln who was not even in town the night I claimed that he was. This is sure to make the legal situation complicated which is why I’m sure that the department will throw the book at me. The ends definitely did not justify the means in this situation and is a reason that noble cause corruption is very

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Case name: Rankin v. McPherson, 483 U.S. 378 (1987) Facts: Ardith McPherson was appointed a deputy in the Constable’s office of Harris County, Texas, on January 12, 1981. Her duties were only clerical. On March 30, 1981, McPherson discussed with her boyfriend, and fellow employee, a report about an attempt to assassinate the President of the United States. She made the remark “If they go for him again, I hope they get him”. Her remark was reported to Constable Rankin, who fired McPherson, even though she told him she did not mean anything by it.…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Ivic 2 Romeo Phillion: 31 Years Behind Bars "It was all fabrication, perjury, bias, promises and coercing. That 's how they built their case. There is not one piece of evidence that points at me; it all points the other way." – Romeo Phillion Miscarriages of justice, where an innocent individual is wrongfully convicted of a crime, were, until recently, thought to occur infrequently. Although the number of wrongful convictions is an unknown figure, it has been said to be approximately one to five percent of convictions in America each year, where one percent averages out to about 6000 cases (Anderson, Anderson & Marquis, 2001).…

    • 2950 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Achman Case Study

    • 748 Words
    • 3 Pages

    During the search, police found things like a Uzi machine gun, a .38 caliber revolver, two stun guns, and a handcuff key, but did not find the supposedly stolen stuff. Police Officers did confiscate the weapons while in search for the stolen items and used it in court. So therefore his fourth amendment was violated. The 4th amendment states, "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. " This action performed by the police officers reminds me of the supreme court case, Mapp V. Ohio.…

    • 748 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In The Real Lincoln by Thomas DiLorenzo he writes that Lincoln was a dictator who flagrantly violated constitutional freedoms, and violated civil liberties. Lincoln justified his actions by claiming their necessity because of the war, and permitted because of war powers. What those powers were was never clearly defined except in putting down a rebellion. His real motive was to centralize power under his tyrannical government. Lincoln's violations of civil liberties included the suspending habeas corpus, instituting martial law, using military tribunals for civilian trials, suppressing free elections, interfering with state legislatures, engaging in a war without the consent of congress, blockading southern ports, censoring telegraphs and newspapers, and authorizing a mass execution of natives in a Sioux uprising in Minnesota.…

    • 1714 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    You can break the law in many ways, even when you do not recognize that you are doing it. Frank Trippett, in his passage “A Red Light for Scofflaws” claims that Americans believe that law-and-order is threatened by things such as violent and major crimes, he believes that the foundations of social order is shaken when citizens do not take the law seriously. Trippet supports his argument by first describing the actions that citizens take to not pay enough attention to the law. He gives evidence of the crimes that people commit in order to make people aware of how easily the law is broken, and how it does not register in their minds. The author creates a serious, factual tone and presents it to the people that do not recognize the things that they do to break the law.…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Innocent until proven guilty”, a principle set forth by the founder fathers is fundamental for the protection of human and civil rights. However, “guilty until proven innocent” seemed to be the new slogan the judicial branch abided by during a dark time known as the red scare. The red scare can best be defined as a widespread series of actions by individuals and organizations whose, “intentions were to frighten Americans with false and highly exaggerated charges of Communist subversion for the purpose of political, economic, and psychological profit (Carleton 14).” The apparent threat of communism was one that erupted throughout the nation beginning during the cold war and lasted well into the 1960s. The face of this movement was Joseph McCarthy, a Republican Wisconsin senator, who’s movement and political tactics are now commonly referred to as a McCarthyism.…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    On behalf of the United States, I would like to acknowledge and pursue a reoccurring problem that the United States has faced, the misconduct of Abraham Lincoln. I seek the necessary justice to be brought to our current president, Mr. Lincoln. Not only has Mr. Lincoln stepped outside his respective presidential power, but he has acted unconstitutionally, and thus he deserves to pay for his actions. Throughout this American Civil War, Lincoln has executed many improper, unjustified, and unconstitutional deeds, and on those grounds, he deserves to face the proper consequences, just as anyone else who did what Lincoln did would face.…

    • 1457 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Bonus Army marched the streets and caused chaos for everyone. They were belligerent and had to be forcefully removed from private property. There has been a lot of evidence brought to this court today, though the only evidence that has no inconsistencies is the evidence to defend president Hoover. President Hoover did not violate any of the Bonus Army’s first amendment rights because they forfeited falling under the amendment’s protection when they were no longer protesting peacefully. Also, President Hoover was not responsible for the destruction of the camps because he did not send an order to enter the camps, he actually sent the exact opposite order, but it was General MacArthur who refused to obey those orders.…

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Impeach Clinton Lies

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A majority of the public though, continued to side with the democrats, believing that although he most definitely lied about his oath, they felt as if the lies did not matter as much because the situation did not directly affect the Nation’s well being. But how can serious lies and meaningless lies exist? Shouldn’t a lie just be a lie? Those questions were the center of the Republican’s argument. Clinton had lied under oath plain and simple and that was an impeachable offense no matter what the lie was about.…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Abraham Lincoln as a congressman and Lincoln as a President had vastly different views on free speech in wartime both of which were important to American History. However, President Lincoln’s views on free speech in wartime set a precedent of censorship that could be seen in later presidencies and their views on speech during wartime. Therefore, while both aspects of Lincoln were important to American History, President’s Lincolns views were vastly more important and had a greater impact. Lincoln was a congressman during the Mexican-American war, and viscously lashed out against the war criticizing the president and the government. He doubted that President Polk was right when he said that American blood was spilt in the U.S and not Mexico.…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Violate The 1st Amendment

    • 163 Words
    • 1 Pages

    The school decision in this case does not violate the 1st amendment, because the purpose of this choice was to protect the affiliated students from possible violence and disturbances in the classroom. The five students were wearing American flag clothing on the school grounds, which included a shirt and a bandanna. The wearing of this clothing could fall under freedom of speech, because this could be seen as an act of expressing their patriotism or citizenship in the United States, but they did violate the school policy by wearing bandanas. There was also no evidence that the flag actually caused any violence or disruptive, but the purpose of the choice to ask students to remove the clothing, was to avoid this from happening. The school's interest…

    • 163 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Law 531 Week 3 Quiz

    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages

    36. a) Yes, because even though Peterman only provided Fogelman with a contract of agency that allowed him to sell the home, it can be inferred that he is also allowed to sell the piano that was still in the home. It does not have to be explicitly stated in the contract of agency. b)…

    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Illegal Operation an Essential Contribution to Social Protest/Affirmation This paper will focus on the sculpture, The Illegal Operation (1962) by Edward Kienholz. The assemblage sculpture can be found on the second floor of the Ahmanson Building at the Los Angeles County Museum of Art. Although understated at first, this sculpture deals with the taboo practice of abortions regulated in the 1960’s. In this paper I will discuss why this sculpture would make a good contribution to our textbook, specifically chapter 11…

    • 1451 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In my opinion I think someone breaking the law can also be “expressing the highest respect for law” if they are openly breaking the law for a just cause and willing to face the consequences for their actions. I believe that every circumstance you find yourself in will result in a consequence. I look at the peaceful protesters who lay in the street for their cause and willing let the police arrest them for their disobedience. They do not fight the police they adhere to their commands without issue. You act in an orderly fashion while protesting unjust laws.…

    • 120 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Laws are regulations established by authorities, such as the government and are enforced by the police to make sure that the laws are upheld. Laws are enforced to preserve safety, supervise actions of individuals and work for the better good of society. Without the laws, chaos would spread across the world. However, there are times when each and every one of us finds a law to be unjust and would love to see that law change. Throughout the history of mankind, civil disobedience hasn’t been very uncommon.…

    • 1624 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays