Viewpoints Death Penalty

Improved Essays
“The old law of an eye for an eye leaves the whole world blind.” – Martin Luther King Jr.
The execution of criminals has been pursued throughout history as a natural and orderly punishment. Only today do people find themselves on a spectrum of belief about the death penalty, which we’ve divided into liberals and conservatives. Liberals believe the death penalty should be abolished because of its inhumane presence unlike conservatives who believe the death penalty is fair punishment to kill those who kill. As the debates progresses, we have maintained the same in our execution and violation of the eighth amendment. The death penalty must go because it infringes our rights, it is bias and towards its victims and has a bad effect on those states in which it is employed.
…show more content…
The eighth amendment clearly states, “Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.” However, it is unclear what “cruel and unusual” means. As Americans debate about how capital punishment is unconstitutional, Liberals have taken a clear stance, supporting individual rights. Liberals agree with the U.S. catholic Conference that “we cannot teach that killing is wrong by killing” (Rooney). Additionally, the FBI has found that “the states with the death penalty have the highest murder rates” (Rooney), which begs the question, is the death penalty really effective in the way we want? Liberals say that it is in the best interest to abolish the death penalty. Liberals argue that replacing the death penalty with imprisonment is constitutional and effective, and hope to enforce the repeal of the capital

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Furman V. Georgia

    • 2080 Words
    • 9 Pages

    “An eye for an eye will make the whole world blind” were the words of the wise Mahatma Gandhi. In no where else is this more so proven than in the American criminal justice system. Our definition of justice is often measured by how long a sentence or how large a fine is and how it relates to the corresponding crime. Some people can get prison time, fines, and even sentenced to death as a punishment for the crimes they have committed. This state sponsored death as punishment is a tactic used to frighten and intimidate people into not committing crimes, but this type of punishment goes directly against the 8th amendment right, directly prohibiting the cruel and unusual punishment, despite the generations separating their respective implementations.…

    • 2080 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The People of the United States of America, are entitled to many rights, those rights are practiced in the court of law. Amendments 5, 6, 7, and 8 are court rights that are given to the citizens, these rights are a right to a grand judge and jury and no abuse of governmental authority, a speedy trial, the reservation of a defendant’s right to a trial with a jury, and forbidding cruel and unusual punishments. “In 1976 the Supreme Court tried to heal the constitutional infirmities, in the death penalty- 40 years years later a survey shows that this has failed and that it is a violation of the 8th Amendment,” as Juris Doctor, Stephen G. Breyer says (“Top” 2016). The 8th Amendment protects our right to cruel and unusual punishment, Court is thinning our rights to create a death penalty to kill someone who is supposed to be protected. “Death Sentences are meted out not only erratically, but also discriminatory, on the basis of race.”…

    • 1744 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The death penalty is degrading human dignity, affects more than the person being executed, but also teaches people killing people is the way to prove killing is wrong. “The Eighth Amendment to…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Death Penalty Texas

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Not all the cases with death sentences is right, “I don't want to put one innocent person to death to put 99 that are guilty to death,” said Gary Johnson (Johnson 1). In addition, the cost of it is also excessively expensive; therefore, this solution is not as good as its definition. The death penalty has its impacts to the criminal behavior of people as the result of reducing crime rates since it was re-instituted. One can say keep it but only for a symbol. Life is precious, and no one has the right to end other’s…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Revenge is something everyone has fancied at one point or another. From keying a car to something more sinister, there’s always some form of revenge we deem ‘justifiable.’ But someone must ask, is revenge appropriate? According to Source D, in the years between, and including, 1992-2003, more than half of all murders were provoked by “quarrel, revenge, or loss of temper.”…

    • 168 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It has been argued over the years that capital punishment violates the eight amendment in the Constitution of the United States of America. It was argued that because the eighth amendment states that no cruel and unusual punishments should be inflicted upon anyone, so, capital punishment should not be used as a form of paying for a crime. What is not being taken under consideration, however, is the fact that the law has been morally and properly assessing these cases. How so? Well, lets begin by stating that the Supreme Court ruled in 1976 in the Gregg v. Georgia and Jurek v. Texas, that a death sentence did not violate the eighth amendment as the forms of execution have been reformed so that the punishments are not categorized as inhumane and cruel.…

    • 1183 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Numerous contend that death penalty disregards the human privileges of the individual sentenced to death. Others contend that from a societal viewpoint the guilty party damaged the human privileges of the victim(s) and in this way should be considered responsible. The American legitimate framework, reflecting popular sentiment, holds that capital punishment in essence is not a human rights infringement. The U.S. Preeminent Court has held that capital punishment is not savage and uncommon discipline (Gregg v. Georgia, 1976), even while narrowing the relevance of capital punishment in specific circumstances (Atkins v. Virginia, 2002; Roper v. Simmons, 2005). We call attention to out essentially to note that there does not have all the earmarks…

    • 1021 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The death penalty has been viewed as both an effective and defective system of punishment. However, this style of execution is proven to be financially expensive, immoral, unreliable, and overall not the most successful method of criminal correction. Usage of the death penalty should be used only for the most harrowing crimes, such as mass murder and acts of terrorism or treason. Deontologists view the death penalty as a justifiable solution to a problem, as it is fulfilling a duty to uphold the law.…

    • 1351 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The death penalty continues to be a controversial topic in our society that separates us into two major groups, for and against. It has been around since the beginning of America. Is it time for America to move on to something more reliable? The death penalty is an outdated method of discipline for those who won’t follow the law. In fact, in the last decade, seven out of the fifteen states have abolished the death penalty.…

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Good afternoon. I am here this afternoon to fight for your rights: your right to deny death penalty; your right to no cruel or unusual punishments; your right to say Who exactly, gives us the right to kill? If killing is wrong, then why are we allowed to kill? According to John Grisham. The eighth amendment states that, Prohibits excessive fines and excessive bail, as well as cruel and unusual punishment.…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Though recent public opinion polls show a wide range of support for capital punishment, human rights advocates and civil libertarians relentlessly criticize the immorality of government-sanctioned executions in the United States, the single western industrialized country that proceeds to use the death penalty. Capital punishment is an exceptionally controversial subject to the American society. Is capital punishment justified? The answer to one of the most disputed criminal justice questions is no, capital punishment is unjustified by all means. The death penalty is expensive, may endanger innocent lives, does not deter crime, can be discriminatory, and is inhumane.…

    • 1536 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As far back as the Eighteenth-Century B.C., the death penalty has been a part of our society. It went from getting this punishment for any crime to our current refined laws. The way the death penalty makes its way into Steve Earle’s essay is talking about whether it should or should not be abolished. From reading this essay you can defer that he wants it to be abolished. With some words of his own to a story within, Steve Earle delivers a powerful point to the reader.…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    However, as Berg pointed out, “The United States stands alone among Western democracies in retaining the death penalty.” In fact, two years ago the United States executed 43 and put another 77 people on death row. In 1972, the United States Supreme Court held that the Death Penalty “was cruel and unusual punishment” in the case of Furman v. Georgia and therefore abolished all laws allowing it (Berg). In fact, two liberal justices, William Brennan and Thurgood Marshall supported the abolition on the grounds that it “violates human dignity by treating the defendant’s life as disposable.”…

    • 2927 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The legality and use of the death penalty in the United States of America is a highly controversial issue. Different people have different opinions, of course, which often stem back to morality, cost, or personal judgement. Most of these opinions boil down to one decision: “Should the death penalty be outlawed, or remain legal?” While both sides on the issue hold some amount of viability, the death penalty should be refused under all circumstances. The decision of whether or not the accused should be sentenced to death is something which is often influenced by racial bias, personal vendettas, an appeal to pathos over logos, or a multitude of other factors which make for a fallacious decision.…

    • 1385 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of our country’s biggest conflicts between what is right or wrong is the death penalty. The death penalty is known for punishing criminals of mass crimes such as murder; the death penalty is the capital punishment for a murderer that is convicted or guilty of the crime. I don’t support the death penalty, I side with the eighteen states that have abolished the death penalty in our nation. This means thirty-one states are using the death penalty as a punishment. I believe that the death penalty should be abolished in the United States, there are many reasons how our country would benefit from not using this type of punishment.…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays