I am going to compare how I improved from not using the lecture in my first paper to how I provided ample evidence in my third paper. The first issue in Paper One was brought to my attention by Dr. Gardner who said “it would have helped your essay to use Klammer lecture material on pro-slavery humanitarian argument to set the paper up” (Paper One, bottom of forth page). Meaning, before I started in on my argument, I should have given the reader the pro-slavery argument. Doing so would have given the reader an insight as to why people (like slave owners) in the 1800’s thought in-slaving humans was a way of “bettering” and “improving”
I am going to compare how I improved from not using the lecture in my first paper to how I provided ample evidence in my third paper. The first issue in Paper One was brought to my attention by Dr. Gardner who said “it would have helped your essay to use Klammer lecture material on pro-slavery humanitarian argument to set the paper up” (Paper One, bottom of forth page). Meaning, before I started in on my argument, I should have given the reader the pro-slavery argument. Doing so would have given the reader an insight as to why people (like slave owners) in the 1800’s thought in-slaving humans was a way of “bettering” and “improving”