The ruling represented the Court interpreting the Fourth Amendment as to enable authorities to act against the use of and trafficking illegal drugs. Because of the compelling state interest in curbing illegal drug use among youth, and given the special status of both school authorities and student athletes, the Court ruled that random drug testing did not violate the constitutionally guaranteed privacy of participants in interscholastic sports programs.
The ruling represented the Court interpreting the Fourth Amendment as to enable authorities to act against the use of and trafficking illegal drugs. Because of the compelling state interest in curbing illegal drug use among youth, and given the special status of both school authorities and student athletes, the Court ruled that random drug testing did not violate the constitutionally guaranteed privacy of participants in interscholastic sports programs.