Vegetarianism: The Argument Against Speciesism

Superior Essays
It’s a well-known scenario: A bus is rushing out of control toward a person and a dog. You only have time to save either the dog or the person, and the other will inevitably die. Who would you choose? In our society dominated with speciesism, the answer seems relatively obvious to most people: save the human, a member of our own species. However, it turns out that distinction may be blurring. According to a recent study by Topolski, 40.2% of participants chose to save their pet over a foreign tourist8. The statistic dwindles down dramatically to 2% when the participants are asked to choose between their pet and immediate family member, but this seems to be a dramatic change from the past, and a movement towards placing an equal value on the lives of animals over human strangers. Although this study looked at the relationship of an individual with their pet (and is therefore not a good representative for animals on a whole) it has important implications, and there are other instances in our present day where people seem to be moving towards anti-speciesism, such as the recent spike in veganism (a growth from 1% in 2009 to 2.5% in 2012 – more than doubling …show more content…
There were several philosophers and forms of legislation that supported animal rights throughout history, but it was only recently that there was an increased interest in animal protection from the general population. The vast majority of animal rights organizations were founded in the 20th century, and ethical veganism became mainstream just at the start of the 21st century. So what are some reasons why this idea has become more prominent in our present

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Furthermore, according to a research by Jim Motavalli in which he examined the contradiction of vegetarianism, he put forward that environmental strategy and priorities are broader and more flexible, while animal rights’ strategy and priorities were narrower and often more alienating in their absolutism. Unlike animal rights advocates, many environmentalists are easier to be satisfied diet-wise if people just collectively reduced meat consumption, rather than a wholly vegan diet. This is because environmentalists, who tend to protect wild animals, are not primarily motivated by sentimentalism or compassion over the suffering of individual non-human animals. He concluded that the environmental movement should begin to more openly acknowledge…

    • 223 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Herzog Human Morality

    • 1432 Words
    • 6 Pages

    For many activists, it is hard to understand how inhumane it is to keep some animals as pets. “Animals,” as one activist says it, “are not here for our happiness.” While there is a substantial difference in how we raise animals (within terms of stray, wild, and domestic animals), there is no say in the animals life on how they should be treated. Finally, he seems to indirectly state some of the obvious logic that we are superior and it is only the way of life that we eat meat and research on animals to make life a little easier. It is possible that we can cure cancer or find a way to stop infestations, or even cause breeding to increase, which could increase the amount food…

    • 1432 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the article “What’s Wrong with Animal Rights”, author Abby Hearne states that the current animal rights movement is “built upon a misconceived premise that rights were created to prevent us from unnecessary suffering.” This mixed with the misunderstanding of animal happiness and what it really means. This paper is written for people who are supporters of the current animal rights movement. The author Abby Hearne’s main argument in this essay is that our definition of animal rights is fundamentally wrong.…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is not what people say that defines them, rather it is what people do. Proclaimed sayings and words can only do so much to show a point of view. Ultimately, in society, the importance lies in how a person does something––not about the reasonings and the declarations. Inward principles do not impact other people nearly as much as outward practices. Hence, the importance of prioritizing the doing of one thing over the other.…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Speciesism. This is something the majority of humans do on a daily basis without realizing. According to the dictionary, speciesism can be defined as “discrimination in favor of one species, usually the human species, over another, especially in the exploitation or mistreatment of animals by humans.” Many people view animals as a food resource, entertainment and property; something they are not. Humans should treat animals with more respect and realize their value as individual sentient creatures.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    What I think it means to american is that we are diverse and different than any other countries. This idea and its examples are the symbols of freedom that thousands of Americans, not just soldiers but citizens too, have fought for years to preserve and prefect. Unlike other countries, this country is made up of immigrants. Everyone’s ancestors worked hard to get to this country – whether boat or plane. Many of them started with nothing and worked their way up in society because they could.…

    • 247 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thus, while trying to save animals, activist are potentially hurting…

    • 1085 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Vegetarians protest and fight the meat industry,” in most cases this is not true; however, it is commonly assumed. Many vegetarians are people who are trying to live a healthier lifestyle or people who just disagree with how meat is commonly processed. Although intentions are good skeptics and veggie lovers alike have their concerns with this dietary practice. The most notable concern is that of potential health risks . The benefits and risks of this way of life has raised many eyebrows over the years.…

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal cruelty has always been a challenge that gets overlooked by society in the food market. Many people do not take into consideration the life of the cow, chicken, or pig, and lots of other animals, while enjoying their juicy hamburger, chicken leg, and bacon. “An Animal’s Place” by Michael Pollan argues about animal liberation while using support from Peter Singer’s “Animal Liberation” book. Peter Singer is pro animal rights and has converted lots and outs of people over to vegetarianism, while Michael Pollan loves steak and seeks to see if Singer could convert him as well. Our world changes consistently with the trends of our society, from the civil rights movements of blacks and women, to the legalization of gay marriage.…

    • 1046 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Vegetarians may care enough about animals to not eat them, but a vast majority of them do not care enough about animals to stop using their toiletries or electronics. In theory, being a vegetarian sounds ideal, and if one can afford it and practice it safely, then they should be all means continue their lifestyle. But being a vegetarian is no more than a fad that just gives the illusion of making a change. It is a harsh reality, but animal cruelty, climate change, and health problems would not cease to exist if a small amount of the population maintained their vegetarianism, or even if all humans became vegetarian. Society’s current problems run a lot deeper than just eating meat.…

    • 1198 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In their argument, Francis and Norman reject Singer’s principle, arguing that humans may give human interests greater consideration than comparable animal interest (Francis and Norman 507). Francis and Norman agree that animal interests deserve some consideration, but they argue that it is ethically correct for humans to give human interests more weight than similar animal interests. They base their argument on the premise that all and only creatures with the ability to form plans for the non-immediate future deserve equal consideration of their interests. This essay supports the stance adopted by Francis and Norman, contending that individuals only bear moral responsibilities to some animals more then others, they are ethically right in according more weight to human interests in comparison to those of animals.…

    • 988 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Animal Rights Should animals have rights? If so, should these rights be comparable to those given to humans? Animal Rights are rights believed to be owed to animals in order for them to live full lives, free from suffering. Animals are currently being used, and in some cases abused, in medical research, clothing industries, hunting for sport, food, and population control, and countless other services to humans. As is the case with all ethical issues, there are two defined perspectives and supporters of the current and future treatment given and due to animals.…

    • 1264 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal Welfare Essay

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the world today, people cannot do without animals because they have become an essential part of human existence to both vegetarians and meat eaters. Some animals serve as pet, and some serve as food, and others are used for sports and laboratory experiments. Although some animal activist advocates for animal rights, there are limits to that right because animals cannot be equal with human. They don’t have the intellectual ability that humans have to take responsibilities and control what happens around them. These animals are important in the society and the need to treat them with respect is paramount.…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Ethical Argument In Animal Welfare

    • 1672 Words
    • 7 Pages
    • 10 Works Cited

    Many people concern on what is right and wrong for animal treatment. These arguments are a major issue because many different views and beliefs of people reflect on them. Manly fighting and understanding who has the right over animals is the major concept. Since animals can not speak and choose for their own actions, many people believe that a truthful owner should have the say on what is right for their animal through their beliefs. No matter what regulations are set both sides of the argument will never be satisfied on how humans treat animals.…

    • 1672 Words
    • 7 Pages
    • 10 Works Cited
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Consumption categories are formed mainly on the basis of the commodities involved. Broadly speaking there are two categories: Food and non-food consumption. (a)Consumption to gratify hunger and thirst needs is food consumption. (b) The consumption that is not related to the above but meant for satisfaction of health, education, travel and recreational needs is regarded as non-food consumption 1.2 Nature of Consumption The dynamic nature of human needs gives consumption a dynamic character.…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays