Pros And Cons Of Vegetarianism And The Environment

Superior Essays
I. Vegetarianism and the Environment First off, there is no guaranteed diet that is best for the environment. Some people who switch to vegetarianism as a way to fix the world, but others realized restricted diets aren’t the answer. Meat eaters do, however fuel the factory farming business. Factory farming does destroy; it destroys prairies, forests, soil, and animals. Overgrazing is destroying arable land more and more each day (ProCon.org 3). Around 85% of all grazing land cannot be farmed (ProCon.org 3). While the meat industry is destroying the environment, vegetarians are not innocent either (ProCon.org 3). Vegetarians do contribute to destruction, and Lierre Keith is very passionate about bringing that to attention when she says, “When the rain forest falls to beef, progressives are outraged and ready to boycott. But our attachment to …show more content…
The idea that humans are supposed to eat meat can be called dominance and subordination, mutual indebtedness, or kas-limaal (Keith 3). Lierre Keith makes the point that all organisms need each other by stating the example, “the cow produces food for someone else. Her manure feeds soil, plants and insects. The mechanical action of her hooves and her teeth helps the grasslands stay diverse. Her digestive processes free up nutrients -- and not just for her, but for the whole community. Her body will become a meal for predators, scavengers and degraders of all sizes.” (3). Even though what Keith said is true, but it doesn’t always apply. The natural life cycle isn’t so natural anymore with factory farming and humans intervention. “Grazers in the wild are much different from grazers in domestication.” gives an explanation against eating meat to continue the food chain of animals (Zaikowski 4). The food chain has been manipulated so much that we cannot go off what history tells us about organisms’

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    It is personal choice that matters, if these choices are made steadily. I agree with the assertion of the author of “Eating animals”. While some people believes that the world is full of many other problems and this issue is not significant enough to be the first on the “Main problems of the mankind” Agenda, I believe the thinking of adopting (even partly) the not consuming factory farmed meat lifestyle is…

    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Most people currently eat the animal as the main source of their food supply. In the "eating animals", Jonathan Safran Foer tries to persuade people taking the vegetable as the main food supply. He shows the evidence based on data that almost eighteen percent of college students are vegetarian now. There are more vegetarians in college than Catholics, except for business, and it's very close, by about 1%. In addition, Johathan gives his own two reasons for refusing to eat meat.…

    • 167 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Then, from the perspectives of animal producer and meat-eaters,…

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In this essay, I will consider the topic of vegetarianism from the perspective of environmental concerns that are often associated with the production of meat. In the article, Vegetarianism and Planetary health (2000), Michael Allen Fox states that strict vegetarianism ought to be adopted in order to avoid the eco-destructive nature of the livestock industry. Although there may be some truth to Fox’s initial premise which claims that eating meat is harmful for the environment, I will argue that strict vegetarianism is in fact unnecessary, as it does not exclusively solve the issue of ecological destruction. I will aim to expand on Fox’s claims in order to establish that it is better and more viable to adopt a ‘Demi-Vegetarian’ diet as described…

    • 2037 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Over the past century we have seen not only our population skyrocket, but also our technological capacity increase exponentially. My worldview, primarily eco-centric, is focused on the incredible potential of technology to create sustainable harmony between humanity and the earth. We have gotten to a point in our evolution where it will be impossible to revert to our pre-industrial state. Our resources are limited and should not be wasted, this traces back to the fundamental property of the universe: energy and matter cannot be created or destroyed; it can only be converted between forms. So much matter is wasted and converted into a state in which it is impossible to recover it, and instead of draining the earth we should be focusing on developing inexhaustible…

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Human being begin hunting and fishing two million years before. We could just not satisfy with eating only plants. The reason we started hunting and fishing is of course to eat meat and seafood for survivor, and it provides other various nutrition that plants could not provide for us, but it also showed social rank. The most successful hunters or fishers can form alliances and gain females by sharing what they caught. But as human figure out the easier way to catch them and begin to industrialized products, it became different meaning.…

    • 1976 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Factory farming has affected our environment because of the massive amounts of animal waste. The massive amounts of animal waste has affected the environment through pollution. For instance, in the book it states, “So much shit, so poorly managed, that it seeps into rivers, lakes, and oceans, killing wildlife and polluting the air, water, and land in ways that are devastating to human health”(Foer 174). Author Jonathan Safran Foer explains in this quote how animal waste from factory farms has led to pollution that affects the environment and humans. He supports his first quote by also stating, “The polluting strength of this shit is 160 times greater than raw municipal sewage waste”(Foer 174).…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Humans are omnivores, which means that they eat both plants and animals. Ultimately, the human can decide whether or not they are going to consume animal meat. I am analyzing the article “Against Meat” in the They Say I say collection of articles. Jonathan Safran Foer talks about his experiences with his struggles of becoming a vegetarian.…

    • 1034 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In fact, the widespread belief that farming conditions should change or that humans should avoid meat would negatively impact the economy. In the article, “Is there a moral case for meat?”, Nathanael Johnson splits his essay into two parts. In the first part of the article, Johnson tries to find a logical counter…

    • 1085 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The ethical reasons behind embracing the veganism culture involve the exploitation of animals. Vegans believe that it is unethical to consume animal body parts or use them for clothing or any other household items. The torture and killing of animals for any reason, be it for research purposes, entertainment, or for its products is against veganism. As such, vegans feel guilt when eating animal products or meat coming from animals that have been killed or tortured. They believe that it is ethically wrong for people to put their welfare or the desire for animal products over the well-being of the animal.…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Why Is Veganism Wrong

    • 1664 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The vegan diet originated from spiritual values, differing than the reasons of present day people. When people make the change from eating meat to eating plants, some diet plans can become insubstantial for nutrient intake. Nutrients like proteins and vitamins convert to energy, but if the body contains less than average values of nutrients, it will produce less energy. Having less energy throughout the day is bad for the body. Some parents of children and pets convert to Veganism, but if their vegan diet pushes onto their loved ones, they can suffer from malnourishment and expensive medical bills in life.…

    • 1664 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    If animal agriculture had this much of an impact over one hundred and seventy years ago, imagine the magnitude of impact it is having today. To provide land for the livestock, feed crops, slaughterhouses, and grazing fields, animal agriculture uses nearly seventeen million square miles of land. That’s about thirty percent of the earth’s land mass. Twenty-six percent of all ice-free land, seventy percent of all farming land, and thirty percent of all plant land surface is dedicated to animal agriculture. Vegetarian diets only require a portion of the thirty-three percent of farming land that animal agriculture uses, since one acre of plants can feed more humans than it can animals.…

    • 1230 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 8 Works Cited
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although we like to think that eating animals is normal, natural and necessary, this practice of the slaughter and consumption and otherwise use of animals is wreaking havoc on our environment in a very…

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The chances of earth’s environment declining will only increase if humanity continues its meat eating habits, due to the global effects that raising livestock cause to the climate. It has recently been made known to the public on a larger scale, that one of the greatest factors to the ozone layer being damaged is from raising livestock. It is up to us to fix this issue before it makes the world an unlivable place. We have to do this now instead of later. Recently, a group of environmentalists wanted to help save the planet, so they did as much research as they could to find the real issues.…

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Piper asserts that a vegan diet leads to the death of many animals than that of a non-vegan. He claimed that tractors kill animals such as mice, moles, rabbits and other rodents or have their habitats destroyed (par. 3). According to Piper vegans should consider the reducing their plant 's consumption and “eat more cow” that graze on pasture (par, 4). Animals that produce meat produce more calories and proteins per head than plants making them environmentally friendly contrary to what vegans claimed that they are harmful to the environment. Animals require pasture that is part of biodiversity and by growing pasture; human beings are taking care of the…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays