Vandalism And Street Art

Improved Essays
Surprisingly, even today, street art is often perceived as vandalism. This misunderstood art form is present in all of our daily lives, acting as an inspiration to countless aspiring artists and brightening up the dismal world we live in today, with ongoing wars and refugees fleeing to safety, in an attempt to escape their nightmare. It is a method of self-expression used by many people. Every individual has their hobbies and interests. To some it is street art. To those who object to street art, it should be emphasised that street art is not graffiti and graffiti is not street art. Street art is a creative ability that should be praised and admired. Instead it is often disdained. Is it right to simply equate the unique talented art we see …show more content…
Harmful or offensive language is not used by street artists. They do not do it to ruin streets or deface walls, in fact their intent is the antithesis of this. The artists just want to express themselves and use colours to camouflage the tedious buildings we constantly pass every day. A little joy or happiness can be found simply on the walls that surround us. So what does not make sense is why it is still condemned as vandalism. Street art is an intricate technique with beneficial values and should become legal. There are so many heinous crimes being committed in this world: murder, kidnapping, rape, and now somehow street art is a punishable offence too. Do you truly agree that street art should come under the same heading as these crimes? An example of this was in 2008, when a handful of London artists were arrested for “defacing public property”. As a result, they served almost two years. Nevertheless, at that time, many people vigorously defended these artists to claim their …show more content…
The art is getting so much attention, it is equivalent to the amount, art displayed in museums receive, as explained by Oliver Bennett in his article on street art. This is important since it is argued highly by the opposite side that it is not real art, yet if ‘contemporary art’ is considered as real then so should street art. There are currently ongoing street art tours in various places- New York, Paris, Melbourne, Berlin, London- street art is a growing force of fascination that catches the eyes of a vast number of people all across the world. Alternative Tours is a business based in London which conducts tours across the city. They propose to spend the money they raise to partially create free of charge street art classes for deprived children in the area. Unmistakeably, this shows street art has values. Not only does the art bring in money to the city through tourists, it also plans to deliver children a fun lesson in art which ultimately diverts them from the worries and stress they may be experiencing in their lives. Surely, if tourists themselves are in favour of street art, we should not be treating it as vandalism. Additionally, street art may not be found in galleries, nevertheless, it does deserve to obtain identical admiration to ones that

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Thus, the only discrepancy from other types of art is that graffiti artists do not exhibit their pictures in galleries or museums. As it clearly seen, graffiti artist purpose is to make the environment more livable in terms of beauty. In short, if everybody wants to live in beautiful surroundings, they ought to find graffiti as art. What is more, just like art, graffiti moves people to positive emotions so it is definitely not vandalism. A large number of people feel positive emotions while they are looking at pictures.…

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many of these people who practice painting in public and private properties are people who society discriminates. For this reason, they use this means to defend their right to free expression. They do it as self-expression to make the public areas beautiful in their own way which they see it as art. Where the vandalism is only vandalism when it is mischievous or malicious destruction or damage of property. Some arts says yes, graffiti may be vandalism if done on public property out of a mischievous act but if graffiti is friendly environment, it is not vandalism.…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He does create a solid argument for why art is not beneficial in his writing of The Quarrel Between Philosophy and Poetry: From The Republic, Book X in which it isn’t necessary except for pleasure. In my opinion, Plato does not value the connection between society and humans with feelings and expression. Art is something that should be able to show creativity and openness to the world, but to Plato, this does not bring new knowledge so therefore it should be disregarded. Art is shown everywhere without people even realizing it, but if you look at the bigger picture art shows a deeper level of meaning and understanding that cannot be expressed in any other…

    • 1068 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Controversy in art is typically from something in the artwork being provocative and socially unacceptable. Many artists feel that it is necessary to push the boundaries of what society has set as a standard. Art would not be anywhere near the same as it is now if artists had never put controversy into their work. “If you 're not failing every now and again, it 's a sign you 're not doing anything very innovative.” (Allen) a quote by Woody Allen, relates perfectly with how artists need to look at moving forward. If artists as a community never failed, their would be no new ideas in art, art would become the same, making many people uninterested in what art has to offer.…

    • 1049 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Charles Purcell also believes that your artworks is “nothing arty or glamorous” and Jerry believes your arts is “unoriginal”. Then again some critics believe you have a major impact on the art scene. What do you think about the…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Obscene words and pictures still take time and effort; however, they do not contain any meaning nor are they creative or unique. This clarifies that most things are considered art, but offending people on purpose with no meaning behind it is not. All things considered, tattoos are a form of art. Art is creative, unique, and a lot of time and effort goes into it. However, it should not be offensive in a sense that threatens religion or contains the use of violent words because that is what gave tattoos a stigma to begin with.…

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The police have created a negative outcome on society and there culture by using unethical practices for years. Over done years, the National Police have committed many human rights and broken many laws, that can rival many of the harshest regimes known to man. Many times hey blind eye to gain land warfare and may assist rival gangs. After the earthquakes in January 2010 the international spotlight was placed upon…

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Brom Bones Bully Analysis

    • 223 Words
    • 1 Pages

    I would like to say that Brom Bones is not a malicious bully. It is true that Brom is Ichadod’s rival, but Irving doesn’t mention him as a mean guy anywhere. Irving consider him as having “more mischief than ill will in his composition”. He is not actually a bully, but he does get serious about April fool’s day. He can be considered as an unsung hero.…

    • 223 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    His parents are Odessa and Ronald. In his youth, Rodney was arrested for robbing a store in California. He was convicted and sent to prison for one year. In 1991 King was involved in an incident with four Los Angeles police department. After the incident mentioned above Mr. King had many run-ins with law enforcement.…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For others, graffiti is a form of art due to its expressive nature regardless of where it is placed. Public opinion on graffiti is torn in modern society but is slowly shifting in favor of it. Graffiti is art to those who interpret it that way, and vandalism to the opposing viewpoint. As urban graffiti artists are eager to make their mark on their city and the world, street art is on the rise. The Guardian writes, “NYPD reports graffiti complaints had jumped 24% in the past year,” due to the fact that graffiti is becoming more…

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays