Fanaticism In Tartuffe Essay

Improved Essays
During the Age of Enlightenment, thinkers believed in reason, liberty, and scientific methods instead of tradition and religion. Many writers published their works that stated the problems of the misuse of religion and the importance of critical thinking. Moliere was one of writers during the Age of Enlightenment, known mostly for his comedy. He was a French play writer who wrote the comedy Tartuffe, which shows the concept of religious hypocrisy, ignorance and fanaticism. In the drama, he created various characters who represent different values of Enlightenment. In the drama Tartuffe, Moliere describes the reactions and attitudes of different characters toward the religious hypocrisy to show ignorance and fanaticism. The characters who …show more content…
They use different nature’s things to tell people what’s happening in their lives. Romantic poems give people impression that their lives may leave in people’s imagination and express an graceful way to relate with reality.

A. The quote is from G.W. Leibnitz’s Theodicy. It means there is evil exist, but it is not great amount. It reflects to Leibnitz’s claim that God creates the best of all possible world and tells people what is Leibnitz’s attitude toward God.
B.
It comes from Moliere’s Tartuffe. Even though Tartuffe claims to be pious, we know he is not. It is a turning point of the drama because his hypocrisy will be exposed because his lust for Elmire.
C.
It is from William Wordsworth’s poem “Lines Composed a Few Miles above Tintern Abbey.” This quote describes the way he feels in the past five years. He has deep memory of “beauteous forms” – not like a blind man who cannot imagine the view fully. It is important because it shows the connection between nature and man’s mind.
E.
This quotation is from John Keats’s “Ode of a Nightingale.” He desires for a drink of wine and that he can get thoroughly intoxicated. It is just like he is obsessed with Nightingale’s voice. He wants peaceful way that he can escape the

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    God must be a powerful and all-knowing but also good. Despite that the world is filled with problems and evil things, it is still the best possible world. One can go either way, saying God is either not all-powerful and or all-knowing or infinite goodness, however, if either one is removed then God is being limited, hence saying that God isn't God, therefore, saying that there is no God. There is a God who chose the world with an enormous possible collection of phenomena gathered by the simplest possible laws, a world of balanced order. Leibniz tackles the problem of evil not by disregarding the blemishes of this world.…

    • 1791 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout the Canterbury Tales, Chaucer uses different literary devices to develop tone and attitude about his character’s and their actions. Chaucer specifically satirizes the Miller in the General Prologue, Miller’s Prologue, and the Miller’s Tale to present his opposing views on education and religion by developing the Miller’s appearance, ignorance, and immaturity undesirably. Throughout literature, undesirable features are given to characters authors disdain, dislike, and satirize. In this case, Chaucer uses the General Prologue. Miller’s Prologue, and the Miller’s Tale to satirize the Miller’s physical appearance, offensive personality, and gruff mannerisms.…

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The first communicable attribute I will be looking at is goodness. Humans can be good in relation to one another, but their standard is subjective. Therefore, true goodness is understood in light of the revelation of God in his Word. We can emulate the goodness of God, but we can never be perfectly good. We often hate, as the Lord does, but we do it unrighteously and in ignorance; God utilizes righteous hate and uses perfect judgment.…

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The second view is that God is righteous, He loves love and hates hatred, He is a God that desires for us to act in a certain way and not in another (Lewis 36). Pantheists believe that God is the universe and anything in it is part of Him; meanwhile, Christians believe that God created the universe. Lewis continues from there and tackles the age-old question, “If a good God made the world why has it gone wrong?” (Lewis 38). His explanation for this is that if the universe truly was so cruel and unjust and completely void of any meaning, humanity should have never found out about this lack of meaning. Lewis says that he believes in Christianity because it, as well as reality, are very complicated, odd and not what you could guess.…

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plantinga believes, like Mill, that human free will is the explanation as to why evil exists. However, in doing so, he does not belittle the powers of God, nor the good intentions. The Free Will Defense is used as an “effort to show that there may be a very different kind of good that God can’t bring about without permitting evil” [1;347]. This different kind of good is free will. God created humans with the will to choose the good in a battle between good and evil.…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A theodicy being an attempt to show that the existence of evil doesn 't rule out the possibility of God 's existence. What I can do is examine some of the most popular theodicies and argue a point for their validity. The most popular theodicy is called The Free Will Defense. This argument holds that God maximized the goodness in the world by creating free beings. Being free means that we have the choice to do evil things, a choice which some of us choose to exercise.…

    • 1336 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dr. Faustus stays within the guidelines of a standard “tragedy”, seeing the ultimate peripeteia of the protagonist, who unbeknownst to him is morally wrong. The speech provided displays strong parallels to the tensions as a whole in the play, ranging from religion to power. The speech also invites the audience to wonder whether hell is fact or fiction, regardless of religious beliefs. Marlowe creates an almost summarized version of the entire play through this speech, with regards to the characters speaking and key ideas touched on within it. The speech provides evidence of the constant strife over religious beliefs and shows glimpses of the darker side of religion, with the mention of hell and “Lucifer” (5.131).…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moliere 's Tartuffe, and Voltaire 's Candide are each praiseworthy abstract works of the eighteenth century in their own particular rights. Fraud is a sarcastic drama, and Candide a provocative travelog. While each sticks somberly to its type, different similitudes and also differentiating contrasts can be followed among the previously mentioned works. Composed amid the Age of Enlightenment, each of these works mirrors the belief system of the period and subsequently, has different likenesses. Firstly, each of these works commends reason over religion and the hypothesis that man is in charge of his own behavior.…

    • 1406 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The poem, “I Hid My Love”, was written in a ballad form with an iambic tetrameter. It consists of three stanzas with eight lines each. In the first stanza, the author explains how difficult it is trying to forget his beloved and love someone else, because he is reminded of her everywhere he goes. The poet uses the persona, which is the attitude of the speaker towards his beloved. It is present in lines 3, 5, 6, and 8; He has a positive view of her, but he is sad because his love for her is secret.…

    • 1596 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fortunato is interested in sampling this rare wine that Montresor claims to have in such a large quantity. Montresor says, “But I have received a pipe of what passes for Amontillado, and I have my doubts” (Poe). Montresor shows uncertainty to Fortunato that his wine is authentic. His goal in this is to entice him into coming back to his vaults. In his article, “The Cask of Amontillado,” Morsberger explains, “Knowing his victim’s vanity, Montresor baits him by saying that some fools argue that Luchesi’s taste is as fine as Fortunato’s.” By suggesting Luchesi is an expert, it basically assures that Fortunato will want to come to the vaults.…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays