Institution
Professor
Course
Date
Logic
1. Valid and invalid arguments
A valid logic argument is has a condition that all premises are true meaning the conclusions cannot be false in any way. On the other hand, an invalid argument is the one that offers a possibility of its conclusion being false even if all other premises are true.
Differences
For the logically valid arguments, adding an extra premise do not have an effect on the conclusions, that is, if the conclusion is validly deduced from a set of premises, then it can never in any way be changed by adding extra new premises. It is also conceivable for the valid argument premises to be true even if it has false conclusion.
For the invalid arguments on the other hand, …show more content…
A condition which is termed as necessary shows that a statement need to be proven to be true while a sufficient condition is a statement that if proven, it has a guarantee of being true.
If A then B, means that if you have A is sufficient for B, and for this case if one has A then B will also be there without any exceptions.
If B then A, means A is necessary for B, and therefore every time B exists, then A is also there with no exceptions.
2. For the argument (∑, A) every premise in ∑ is true, and A is true.
3. Logical validity versus inductive validity
Inductive valid argument is an argument based on the thought that the founding premises provide reasons to support the apparent truth of the conclusion. In such arguments, the intention of the premises is to be strong such that if the premises are true then there is unlikelihood of the conclusion being false.
Logical validity on the other hand can be defined as the property possessed by an argument if it meets the following condition: if the premises are true, then the conclusions should as well be true. That is the premises cannot be true and conclusions being false at the same time.
Examples
Consider the following statements:
• Whenever there is creation, a creator should also be in …show more content…
ii. The Principle of Nonmaleficence
This principle requires individuals not to intentionally create a harm to the patients through acts of omission or commission. iii. The Principle of Beneficence
The general meaning of this principle it that all healthcare workers are obliged to take great care for the patients and as well take positive steps for them. iv. The Principle of Justice
In healthcare justice is normally defined as a form of fairness and considering this, the healthcare workers should ensure that they give each patient what belongs to them.
b. What are specifications of moral norms?
A moral norm is an indication of how humans try to exercise their freedom. Moral norms can be expressed in a number of ways that include: Rules, dispositions, character traits, principles and considering the life of a given individual
c. What is balancing of moral norms?
It trying address issues of intersection of ethics and foreign policy in a dialogue between the Carnegie Council on international affairs and ethics.
d. Explain some conditions on