What Is The Difference Between Valid And Valid Logic

Great Essays
Name
Institution
Professor
Course
Date

Logic
1. Valid and invalid arguments
A valid logic argument is has a condition that all premises are true meaning the conclusions cannot be false in any way. On the other hand, an invalid argument is the one that offers a possibility of its conclusion being false even if all other premises are true.
Differences
For the logically valid arguments, adding an extra premise do not have an effect on the conclusions, that is, if the conclusion is validly deduced from a set of premises, then it can never in any way be changed by adding extra new premises. It is also conceivable for the valid argument premises to be true even if it has false conclusion.
For the invalid arguments on the other hand,
…show more content…
A condition which is termed as necessary shows that a statement need to be proven to be true while a sufficient condition is a statement that if proven, it has a guarantee of being true.
If A then B, means that if you have A is sufficient for B, and for this case if one has A then B will also be there without any exceptions.
If B then A, means A is necessary for B, and therefore every time B exists, then A is also there with no exceptions.
2. For the argument (∑, A) every premise in ∑ is true, and A is true.
3. Logical validity versus inductive validity
Inductive valid argument is an argument based on the thought that the founding premises provide reasons to support the apparent truth of the conclusion. In such arguments, the intention of the premises is to be strong such that if the premises are true then there is unlikelihood of the conclusion being false.
Logical validity on the other hand can be defined as the property possessed by an argument if it meets the following condition: if the premises are true, then the conclusions should as well be true. That is the premises cannot be true and conclusions being false at the same time.
Examples
Consider the following statements:
• Whenever there is creation, a creator should also be in
…show more content…
ii. The Principle of Nonmaleficence
This principle requires individuals not to intentionally create a harm to the patients through acts of omission or commission. iii. The Principle of Beneficence
The general meaning of this principle it that all healthcare workers are obliged to take great care for the patients and as well take positive steps for them. iv. The Principle of Justice
In healthcare justice is normally defined as a form of fairness and considering this, the healthcare workers should ensure that they give each patient what belongs to them.
b. What are specifications of moral norms?
A moral norm is an indication of how humans try to exercise their freedom. Moral norms can be expressed in a number of ways that include: Rules, dispositions, character traits, principles and considering the life of a given individual
c. What is balancing of moral norms?
It trying address issues of intersection of ethics and foreign policy in a dialogue between the Carnegie Council on international affairs and ethics.
d. Explain some conditions on

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Nathan Cha Professor Song Philosophical Perspectives 17 December 2015 The cosmological Argument In William Lane Craig’s, “The Kalam Cosmological Argument,” he argues that whatever begins to exists had a cause of its existence, and since the universe began to exist Craig claims that the universe had a cause for existing. Craig furthers his claim by stating that God is the cause for the universe existing. To object to this argument J.L. Mackie brings some questions to the table to unpack Craig’s claims.…

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The first message I ever gave was here a couple of years ago, and it was also on Romans. And in that message, I explained what it meant when certain words are used to begin a passage. Romans 8:28 begins with the word “AND”. When a passage starts with the word “AND”, what it means is, that it’s a connection. It’s a connection between what he has been saying and what he's about to say.…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If some Duffs are Puffs and no Puffs are Cuffs, the statement, “Therefore, some Duffs are not Cuffs” would be a correct statement. There is one way a person can solve this style of problem. That is the concept of syllogistic reasoning. Syllogistic reasoning is used when problems have an answer that is based off of relationships among the categories within the question (286).…

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    We were told that the first statement was true and the second statement was true therefore, the conclusion had to be true and the statement is valid. That was how syllogisms were explained to one of my university classes. Now that I have actually taken a rhetoric class I am appalled that it would be taught that way. A syllogism deals with the validity of the argument by breaking it down and looking at its…

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    I. Introduction Over the last few thousand years or so, the question of whether God exists or not has been under serious examination. There are only two answers to this question: either you do believe in God’s existence or you don’t. Even if all the evidence in the entire universe leans towards the latter, some people still assume that a supernatural being exists. Blaise Pascal was one of these individuals, and he also believes that regardless of whether it’s probable or not, it’s in your best interest to believe in the existence of God. This idea is called Pascal’s Wager, and it states that although the odds may be against it, the payoff for believing in God is much more fulfilling than not believing.…

    • 1613 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Logic is a synonym for reasoning, and is used as the basis for many arguments . It is associated with facts and truth but does not require them. In her essay "Finding the Good Argument OR Why Bother With Logic?", Rebecca Jones places logical strategies into two basic categories of deductive and inductive reasoning. Deductive reasoning begins with a common idea or belief and uses it to simplify a more specific situation. This allows the audience to relate and make sense of the argument being presented.…

    • 203 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    An argument is an argument because their is an opposing side. An argument defined by Merriam-Webster is “a discussion in which people express different opinions about something.” This means that two people have two different views and are trying to convince the other side of their position. Also defined by Merriam-Webster is opinion which is “a belief, judgment, or way of thinking about something : what someone thinks about a particular thing.” For an argument to exist there must be logical propositions from either side.…

    • 1808 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    St. Anslem, was a priest during the 11th century he was the first person known to have formed the Ontological argument as we know it; which can be found in the second chapter of his work, The Proslogion. The Ontological argument is not an argument designed to convert the atheist, but to reassure those who have faith or some belief in God, it was meant for the believer seeking understanding, in other words some logic behind their belief. Since only the “fool” knows but does not believe (Psalms 14:1, 53:1). The word, ‘Ontological’ comes from the prefix ‘ontology’ meaning ‘metaphysical science or study of being’. The argument is not a posteriori argument, thus not being based off experience or observations like The Teleological argument produced…

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The problem of induction is the question if inductive reasoning leads to knowledge understood on the philosophical sense on the lack of justification that, generalizing about properties of similar observations, and assuming a sequence of events will occur in the future the same way as they have done in the past. Hume believes that, “we have no reason to believe the conclusion of any inductive argument.” Inductive means to look for strong evidence to find the truth of a conclusion. In Hume’s Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, he is trying to doubt the hope that the reader can have many reasonable beliefs. Hume does this using a priori and a posteriori statements.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Jury is a group of 12 citizens selected randomly from an electronic register and make a verdict in a trial. The use of jury services in the UK legal system is always being challenged. Two articles with opposite point of view will be evaluated in this review. Since the focus of it is to evaluate the two articles, the jury system will not be examined in detail. The two articles are “The lamp that shows that freedom lives-is it worth the candle?” written by Penny Darbyshire (1991) and “A defence of jury nullification” by Thom Brooks (2004).…

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Sorites Paradox, or the Paradox of the Heap is a paradox which comes in two forms; the many-premise version, and the two-premise version. Both versions lead to the same conclusions but offer different ways to reach that conclusion. This essay will focus on the workings of the two-premise version. The paradox arises as a result of vague predicates (Barker, 2009); demonstrating a problem with human language.…

    • 1230 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    One must use good reasoning when creating a logical statement. To look at the big picture, since logic deals with correct reasoning and since correctness of reasoning is closely related with truth and falsity, then when one reasons correctly, “if the premises of his/her argument are true, then it will be impossible for the conclusion to be false” (Popkin and Stroll, 243) because the statement is valid. Validity is the structure of an argument. Once the validity of an argument is established, one can acquire justified true belief. A belief is when a person thinks something to be the case, when their either may or may not be empirical evidence to prove it with certainty.…

    • 1512 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What is deemed as important to one person may not be as important to another person. It is not good enough to simply treat patients how you would like to be treated as this can be completely different to how the patient wishes to be treated. Therefor care given should work in a person centred way and reflect the patient’s own values, ethics, beliefs and wishes. If the patient is treated mechanically rather than as an individual this can demoralise the patient causing mistrust, frustration and refusal to consent all of which can affect a patient’s health and well-being. The principle of ethics is to treat the patient fairly, in a non-judgemental, non-discriminatory way.…

    • 1048 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are common fallacies in philosophy arguments, which are invalid but do not interfere with the rules of reasoning with one set of standards to another. Some types of common fallacies are begging the question, which is rephrasing the conclusion. Distraction is a wordy argument leading away from the point topic at hand. Another type of fallacy is unclear or shifting conclusions there is no clear point as to what the argument is based on. The importance of a valid argument form is to have structure of the ideas.…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Understanding the foundation and application of medical professionalism is very critical to the development of a healthcare professional’s medical career. As stated by Merriam-Webster, medical professionalism is defined as the conduct, aims, or qualities that characterize or mark a medical professional. In addition, privilege is an important characteristic related to medical professionalism. Privilege is a right or benefit that is given to some, but not others, and a special opportunity to do something that makes someone proud, which can also be used as an advantage that the wealthy and powerful have over others in a society. Privilege and medicine are often overlooked and undermined by those in practice, but it is important acknowledge as it can be troublesome when professionals forget their role in the field.…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays