Vaccinations: Yea or Nay?
In the article “8 Reasons Parents Don’t Vaccinate (And Why They Should),” Tara Haelle, a writer for Parents Magazine, counters arguments that children should not be given vaccines. Haelle addresses and refutes all common reasons for parents opposing vaccinations. By presenting evidence in support of each of her stances, Haelle creates a strong argument, convincing parents and guardians of the benefits of vaccines.
Haelle begins her article by describing the role vaccines play in society. She continues by speaking of the risk/reward relationship of vaccination. Haelle claims that the reward of protection from disease far outweighs the risk involved. To support this claim, she lists eight of the most common risks and misconceptions surrounding vaccinating. Haelle then addresses each of these issues, using statistics, expert opinions, and logic to put parents’ minds at ease. She concludes that vaccinating children is the most logical choice.
One of the aspects of Haelle’s argument is the clarity and organization she uses. The most relevant example of this would be the basic structure of the article. The article is divided into eight numbered section. Each …show more content…
While the article “8 Reasons Parents Don’t Vaccinate (And Why They Should)” forms a strong argument, not every article or other literature does. It is critical that people do not forget this. Being able to distinguish between strong and weak arguments is incredibly important to create a productive society. If people are unable to see what is supported by evidence, they can often be convinced of nearly anything, regardless of its truth or reality. This can lead to a misinformed public making irrational, unwise decisions. This makes it so important for everyone to be careful what arguments or positions they
In the article “8 Reasons Parents Don’t Vaccinate (And Why They Should),” Tara Haelle, a writer for Parents Magazine, counters arguments that children should not be given vaccines. Haelle addresses and refutes all common reasons for parents opposing vaccinations. By presenting evidence in support of each of her stances, Haelle creates a strong argument, convincing parents and guardians of the benefits of vaccines.
Haelle begins her article by describing the role vaccines play in society. She continues by speaking of the risk/reward relationship of vaccination. Haelle claims that the reward of protection from disease far outweighs the risk involved. To support this claim, she lists eight of the most common risks and misconceptions surrounding vaccinating. Haelle then addresses each of these issues, using statistics, expert opinions, and logic to put parents’ minds at ease. She concludes that vaccinating children is the most logical choice.
One of the aspects of Haelle’s argument is the clarity and organization she uses. The most relevant example of this would be the basic structure of the article. The article is divided into eight numbered section. Each …show more content…
While the article “8 Reasons Parents Don’t Vaccinate (And Why They Should)” forms a strong argument, not every article or other literature does. It is critical that people do not forget this. Being able to distinguish between strong and weak arguments is incredibly important to create a productive society. If people are unable to see what is supported by evidence, they can often be convinced of nearly anything, regardless of its truth or reality. This can lead to a misinformed public making irrational, unwise decisions. This makes it so important for everyone to be careful what arguments or positions they