The German revolutionary socialist, philosopher, economist and sociologist, Karl Marx himself believes in social conflict, because it creates separation of the bourgeoisie (capitalist) and proletariat. Marx view people as hard workers, who will do anything to survive. As a people, you either work for someone or own the product. When you own the product, you’re in control and you make money. When you work for someone you are at their mercy, and if you want to survive, you do as you’re told.
The constant change in capitalism, often affects those who need to survive. This causes a conflict between the wealthy and the poor, which feeds into Marx’s idea of social conflict. His intention is all about creating a separation of capitalism and proletariats. …show more content…
The proletariats were the only class who stood “face to face with the bourgeoisie.” (d’Heurle & Tash, 2004, Pg. 22) They were deemed as a dangerous class; the social scum. Can you imagine being under a bourgeoisie class? Imagine witnessing the proletarian being unable to have a family relationship as the bourgeoisie family does? Because of not being a property owner? Proletarian was a major contributor to the industrialization, modernization and have caused a major breakdown amongst the bourgeoisie. They have increased over the years and the gap is much wider in today’s society. Yes, the class struggle …show more content…
For example, “it has converted the physician, the lawyer, the priest, the poet, the man of science, into its paid [wage laborers].” (d’Heurle & Tash, 2004, Pg. 15) Bourgeois developed their own leadership structure, necessary to operate a tight system. Since the Feudal system was not able to sustain the fast growing manufacturing system, bourgeoisie saw room for expansion and rapid financial growth. Knowing the desperation for jobs; the increase manufacturing production and exchange, gave birth to a class conflict between bourgeoisie and proletariat. Bourgeoisie found this perfect opportunity to indulge in wealth and power control. This was a new level of oppression, an increase struggle for the
The constant change in capitalism, often affects those who need to survive. This causes a conflict between the wealthy and the poor, which feeds into Marx’s idea of social conflict. His intention is all about creating a separation of capitalism and proletariats. …show more content…
The proletariats were the only class who stood “face to face with the bourgeoisie.” (d’Heurle & Tash, 2004, Pg. 22) They were deemed as a dangerous class; the social scum. Can you imagine being under a bourgeoisie class? Imagine witnessing the proletarian being unable to have a family relationship as the bourgeoisie family does? Because of not being a property owner? Proletarian was a major contributor to the industrialization, modernization and have caused a major breakdown amongst the bourgeoisie. They have increased over the years and the gap is much wider in today’s society. Yes, the class struggle …show more content…
For example, “it has converted the physician, the lawyer, the priest, the poet, the man of science, into its paid [wage laborers].” (d’Heurle & Tash, 2004, Pg. 15) Bourgeois developed their own leadership structure, necessary to operate a tight system. Since the Feudal system was not able to sustain the fast growing manufacturing system, bourgeoisie saw room for expansion and rapid financial growth. Knowing the desperation for jobs; the increase manufacturing production and exchange, gave birth to a class conflict between bourgeoisie and proletariat. Bourgeoisie found this perfect opportunity to indulge in wealth and power control. This was a new level of oppression, an increase struggle for the