Essay On Classical Utilitarianism

Great Essays
In this essay, I shall be discussing what constitutes the philosophical doctrine of utilitarianism while outlining the two key aspects central to it; the hedonistic principle, and the consequentialist principle. According to hedonism, pleasure or happiness is considered to be the only intrinsic ‘good’. On the other hand, consequentialism maintains that an action may be considered good or bad depending on its outcomes. We will see how these two principles work together in utilitarian thinking and how this differs between the two main types of classical utilitarianism; Rule and Act utilitarianism. Since utilitarianism is based on these two principles, it is also subject to criticism on both fronts.
A central question faced by any ethical system
…show more content…
This may go on indefinitely. Graham provides us with an example relating to the two World Wars illustrating this point. He supposes, for the sake of the example, that Archduke Ferdinand’s murder was the trigger which set off the First World War. Prior to his murder, the Archduke’s driver made an error and had to turn the car around; this gave the assassins enough time to kill the Archduke. Thus, it seems that from a Utilitarian perspective the driver’s mistake was the cause of the First World War which resulted in further tragedies, the Second World War, and millions …show more content…
I will be discussing two of them here. The first is that happiness is generally a subjective thing – if by subjective we mean depending on your own preference and opinion. What is pleasure producing for me might not be pleasure producing for another person. Thus, we cannot speak of any one activity which makes everyone happy. Although Graham points this out he does not think that this is the most serious issue since generally we are able to identify happiness and pain. Also, Mill shows that there are certain things which usually result in happiness and usually in

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Utilitarianism is based on the consequences resulting from actions. Moral actions solely rely on the resulting consequences. Pleasures vary regarding quality and quantity. However, utilitarianism theory gives the quality aspect an upper hand. “Human beings are not satisfied with pleasures they have because they consider them to be of low quality” (Rosen, 2005.…

    • 96 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tellishment Argument

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages

    What is the moral theory of utilitarianism? According to Vaughn, “[Utilitarianism is] the view that right actions are those that result in the greatest overall happiness for everyone involved” (Vaughn, 79). At face value such a moral theory sounds great, because it should promote general happiness. While this is true, a particular argument, the telishment argument, shows that utilitarianism is not a viable moral theory because it promotes decisions that run contrary to historical moral inclinations. To prove this is the case, this paper will first dive into what happiness means in the utilitarian sense, the telishment argument itself, what points of contention the tellishment argument brings up against utilitarianism, and finally, what utilitarianism has to say in its own defense.…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In John Stuart Mill’s influential book “Utilitarianism”, Mill introduces the belief that moral action is based upon the concept of utility, or how he explains it, the greatest happiness principle. It is this greatest happiness principle that defines Utilitarianism as the notion that the best moral actions are those that promote the most amount of human happiness. Actions that would be regarded as the least favorable are those that promote the opposite, unhappiness. The concept of Utilitarianism and that of Consequentialism are similar as both judge the moral value of an action dependent on its consequences, however each claim leads to different conclusions.…

    • 1497 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarian Ethical Theory

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In fact, Baker Bill, (24), asserts that in Utilitarian theory, “the good is measured in terms of consequences of the action.” However, Chonko Larry (5) splits utilitarian theory…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Happiness is desired by many as an end result, but Mill does not explain it with a clear and cogent…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    A government sets rules and regulations in their country in order to ensure safety for every person’s wellbeing. Speed limits, for example are enforced to prevent fatal accidents. Although some individuals wish to go faster or slower than what the speed limit calls for, the medium makes the majority of individuals satisfied which is the goal of Utilitarianism, to maximize pleasure. Utilitarianism is an ethical theory that takes people’s welfare into consideration when out weighing the consequences. It is based on the sum of pleasures while attempting to mitigate.…

    • 149 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Happiness is pleasure and the absence of pain versus unhappiness which is pain and the absences of pleasure. Mill thinks pleasures and happiness are the same. If something brings you pleasure, then you are happy. Just as if you are happy something has brought you pleasure. Take for example food, it is only desired to stop and/or prevent hunger which brings happiness to the person starving.…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism is interesting because it takes primarily a consequentialist approach to ethic looking at the ends to something and looks at the pros or cons of an action, or what causes the most happiness versus the amount of generating pain from an action. Even though it sounds simple to compare the amount of happiness versus pain the equation that we have to use for utilitarianism does not always work the that it should and other flaws that we will go over in this essay taking an unusual stance on the matter, questioning the utility monster but also criticizes utilitarianism later but also saying that it is the best that we have currently have. The idea of a utility monster is not a valid objection against utilitarianism and can be worked…

    • 1459 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    People who are mentally ill and commit crimes are able to get therapy rather than be punished. There are multiple ideologies that argue whether or not therapy should be an option. For example, the idea of Utilitarianism is to promote the greatest amount of happiness possible. In this essay, I will be arguing that Utilitarianism supports the idea of therapy because it brings greater happiness for the many, it allows society to help those who refused to be helped, and there is no “right” and “wrong” in treating those who don’t want to be treated. Utilitarianism’s main focus is to do whatever brings about the most happiness and do least of whatever brings unhappiness.…

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    It is founded on two defining features. The first, Hedonism, which identifies any pleasure as ‘good,’ and any pain as ‘bad.’ The second, Consequentialism, concludes that the most important features of any moral dilemma are consequences. Therefore, pleasure combined with future consequences guides the decision-maker on the appropriate moral course of action. Of course, pleasure on its own is an ambiguous term, and act utilitarianism must take into consideration different features such as duration, intensity, and richness of the pleasure they are rewarding to any specific decision.…

    • 1772 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Final Exam 1. In “A Critique of Utilitarianism”, Bernard Williams argues against the fundamental characteristics of utilitarianism and believes that the notion of ends justifying the means are a way of representing the doctrine of negative responsibility which can lead to consequences from the choices we make/do not make (663). As a result, we are all responsible for the consequences that we fail to prevent as well as the ones we brought upon ourselves. That is, in each case the choice on whether an action is right is determined by its consequences (661). Williams gives the example of killing one villager to save 19 others (664) in which he critiques the different principles of utilitarianism and integrity - the moral righteousness that is…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This situation had a lot of harmful effects on the population such as weakened immune systems, cancer began to spread more, growth defects, and also miscarriages began to happen more frequently than normal. As defined in the notes given in class, utilitarianism means “an action is right as long as it promotes the greatest good for the greatest number of people.” As defined in the text it is “actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness. By happiness is intended pleasure, and the absence of pain; by unhappiness, pain and…

    • 1566 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If nothing else, this view is much more applicable the majority of the time when compared with deontology and contractualism. Those views are much too rigid and don’t maximize the ability for the correct decision to be made. In this essay, I will be arguing that utilitarianism is the superior moral theory as a whole due to its ability to make the most people happy. Also all…

    • 1495 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ethics is a branch of philosophy that, at its core, seeks to understand and to determine how human actions can be judged as right or wrong. There are multiple variations and subclasses of ethical theories. These theories that help us with decision making can be challenged or critiqued. In particular Mill’s Utilitarianism, an ethical theory that promoted the greatest happiness for the greatest number, was criticized by Charles Taylor in his article The Diversity of Goods. The article written by Charles Taylor argues a utilitarian and consequentialist conception of morality leaves out essential aspects of human experience that are integral to our moral lives.…

    • 1852 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The utilitarian theory of punishment fully supports disregarding the origins in sentencing the rioters. The theory specifically focuses on the future with respect to how punishing benefits society. Punishment is justified if society benefits more than the harm caused by punishing the criminal. There are four goals in utilitarian theory. These are specific deterrence, general deterrence, reform and incapacitation.…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays