Utilitarianism In Government

Superior Essays
There are numerous political philosophies that are employed in today’s government, one such philosophy is utilitarianism. It was originally conceived by Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832) and later revised by John S. Mill (1806-1873). The dates alone should be considered with regards to this philosophy, which should altogether be abolished in the realms of government by reason of flawed thinking. This paper will explore a couple of examples on the ways in which utilitarianism has been used in both the government and judicial sectors and while some believe that a utilitarian view keeps Americans safe, in reality it is an outdated and destructive to America’s well-being. The central theme of utilitarian concepts in government is primarily consequentialism. …show more content…
Those being that the American government can be justified for the abuses in power and ultimate sacrifice to civil liberties by use of fear, coercion, deception and control or perhaps, for safety, health and concern. These are primarily the negative effects of utilitarian philosophy seen in Government. However, it has resulted in positive outcomes, there are many examples to this, but conceivably none as important as the vaccination programs, which have saved countless lives and prevented, stalled, or eliminated many diseases that once plagued the …show more content…
Also, purely judging an action by the outcome is hard to do beforehand. Similarly it is rather difficult to quantify pleasures for cost/benefit analysis, granted this only has to be done on a comparative scale, so some may not consider this as serious of an objection. More importantly the calculation required to determine what is indeed right is both complicated and time consuming. Many occasions will not permit the time and many individuals may not even be capable of the calculations. Keeping these points in mind it brings all of this back to the basis of utilitarianism, which, is the greatest good for the greatest number is described in aggregate terms, so that good may be achieved under conditions that are harmful to some, just so long as that harm is balanced by a greater good(Ethical Issues,p.95) . However in this theory it fails to acknowledge any individual rights that could not be violated for the sake of the greatest good. Indeed, just as acts of torture or the violation of civil liberties even the murder of an innocent person could seem worthy if in the end it served the greater

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Many people argue with the viewpoint on the despotism of Parliamentary Policies. Some argue that the British imperial policies towards America were set in place to rob Americans from their natural rights, basically enslaving them. Others argue that it was a convenient idea to justify rebellion for self-serving reasons. I believe that the parliamentary policies robbed Americans from their natural rights. The British policies were irrational for Americans giving them the right to start an American Independence movement to gain that feeling of freedom.…

    • 1396 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Separation of powers refers to the idea to guard against tyranny and preserve liberty and justice. Separation of powers was held that major institution should be divided and dependent upon each other so that one power would not exceed that of the other two branches. Today, Separation of powers is known as the checks and balances necessary for the government while others seems to think that the separation of powers is a destruction to our American government. In the book "American Democracy in Peril" by William E. Hudson, the author makes a significant argument regarding chapter 1 separation of powers, he states that our American government is officially inefficient, unresponsive, unaccountable, indecisive, and hypocritical. He views the need for separation of powers as inadequate, not democratic, and chaotic.…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The good consequence produced may be the best option for the person committing murder, however we know that killing someone, no matter the reason, isn’t morally right. We know this because it’s a universal moral rule. Another consequentialist may argue that the Deontological Theories are flawed in that they don’t include utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is a version of consequentialism that focuses on maximizing happiness and welfare (7-8). Utilitarianism suggests that the rightness or wrongness of an action depends solely on how they affect happiness or welfare.…

    • 1076 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Federalists generally loosely viewed the constitution, and disregarded the need for smaller state legislatures. In document D, Daniel Webster criticizes Madison’s military policy, using the Constitution to prove his point that it is unconstitutional to draft men and children for militia. Webster altered his political views in order to bring opposition the Democrat Republicans. His speech solidifies the idea that parties change their views when they have power. Adding on to the reverse of political views, document E discussed the Hartford Convention, which was a meeting of the New England Federalists to debate on-going matters.…

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Utilitarian Vs Mill

    • 2422 Words
    • 10 Pages

    There is also the issue of moral flexibility, which “refers to the idea that people are motivated to do the right thing, but a given moral principle can give rise to very different moral judgement and decisions across contexts.” (“Judgement and Decision Making” 6). The utilitarians are a prime example of a group who has moral flexibility in their decisions. For them, the right thing to have done in that situation was to carry out the action that produces the most happiness for the group overall. The group happiness would have more value to the utilitarian than the individual pain that will be caused in the murder of one. For anyone who is not a utilitarian, the right action would have been letting all the hostages go and removing the threat, which would be the abductor.…

    • 2422 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Four Moral Theories

    • 1575 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Utilitarian may object to Kant’s conclusion on the use of its maxim as a disguised and hypocritical attempt not to accept that the driver instead uses the utilitarianism approach. Utilitarianism as earlier stated it is a theory that judges the moral worth of an action base on the consequence of producing the pleasurable end. If so, in order to accept their arguments, we would be agreeing that killing a person and not the other five is justifiable because it produces minimal pain and suffering, and maximizes happiness. This seems absurd because it is unfathomable irrespective on which side one stands to measure the pain of some people against the…

    • 1575 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Ugly American Essay

    • 2085 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The Ugly American depicts the difficulties the United States experienced in trying to defeat communism in Southeast Asia. It highlighted methods that the U.S. should have adopted to be successful and the ones that led to failure. The book demonstrated how the political and social climates were affected by individuals’ lack of consideration and awareness of the Sarkhanese culture. The characters in this book are fictional, however some share similar qualities of American diplomats serving abroad today. In this essay, I will identify characters that either succeeded or failed to create a positive and productive atmosphere that supported the U.S. interests.…

    • 2085 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This makes one self-motivating, good and consistent in the society with themselves and others. Justice becomes the sole front of internal harmony and good in a society. The origin and nature of justice is an arrangement that one comes to and is only valuable as it keeps a certain kind of order, predictability and safety. Plato claims that anyone who embraces justice is better off in times of despair and misfortune. He asserts that it is more advantageous for one to be just than unjust because that affects the human soul.…

    • 1295 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Daniel J. Boorstin claims there is a significant distinction between disagreement and dissent in a liberal society, arguing that disagreement is essential to the vitality of democracy, while dissent is effectively its cancer. I agree with Boorstin’s distinction as it applies in a historical context because disagreement promoted the rights of the people, while dissent seriously endangered them. However, I do not believe his distinction holds entirely true in contemporary America because the federal government’s protection of people’s rights is too secure for dissent to significantly weaken democracy. During the sequence of events at America’s founding as a democratic nation in the late 18th century, democracy relied on disagreement. After…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although torturing the gentleman instantly comes across as the most ethical option, both the moral theories of Utilitarianism and Deontology assist in compacting our thoughts into seeing if this thought is truly the most ethical option. Utilitarianism centers its ideal on if a person’s actions help the broadest amount of people. What we do to get to the biggest sum of the least amount of bad results is the goal, it does not matter how it happens, as long as it does. The theory does not take into consideration the individuals feelings, only the results of the whole. A good example of this theory is when I was assigned to choose if I would kill one healthy man to save the lives of 5 injured people in the hospital or not.…

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays