Utilitarianism In Government

Superior Essays
There are numerous political philosophies that are employed in today’s government, one such philosophy is utilitarianism. It was originally conceived by Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832) and later revised by John S. Mill (1806-1873). The dates alone should be considered with regards to this philosophy, which should altogether be abolished in the realms of government by reason of flawed thinking. This paper will explore a couple of examples on the ways in which utilitarianism has been used in both the government and judicial sectors and while some believe that a utilitarian view keeps Americans safe, in reality it is an outdated and destructive to America’s well-being. The central theme of utilitarian concepts in government is primarily consequentialism. …show more content…
Those being that the American government can be justified for the abuses in power and ultimate sacrifice to civil liberties by use of fear, coercion, deception and control or perhaps, for safety, health and concern. These are primarily the negative effects of utilitarian philosophy seen in Government. However, it has resulted in positive outcomes, there are many examples to this, but conceivably none as important as the vaccination programs, which have saved countless lives and prevented, stalled, or eliminated many diseases that once plagued the …show more content…
Also, purely judging an action by the outcome is hard to do beforehand. Similarly it is rather difficult to quantify pleasures for cost/benefit analysis, granted this only has to be done on a comparative scale, so some may not consider this as serious of an objection. More importantly the calculation required to determine what is indeed right is both complicated and time consuming. Many occasions will not permit the time and many individuals may not even be capable of the calculations. Keeping these points in mind it brings all of this back to the basis of utilitarianism, which, is the greatest good for the greatest number is described in aggregate terms, so that good may be achieved under conditions that are harmful to some, just so long as that harm is balanced by a greater good(Ethical Issues,p.95) . However in this theory it fails to acknowledge any individual rights that could not be violated for the sake of the greatest good. Indeed, just as acts of torture or the violation of civil liberties even the murder of an innocent person could seem worthy if in the end it served the greater

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Tellishment Argument

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages

    What is the moral theory of utilitarianism? According to Vaughn, “[Utilitarianism is] the view that right actions are those that result in the greatest overall happiness for everyone involved” (Vaughn, 79). At face value such a moral theory sounds great, because it should promote general happiness. While this is true, a particular argument, the telishment argument, shows that utilitarianism is not a viable moral theory because it promotes decisions that run contrary to historical moral inclinations. To prove this is the case, this paper will first dive into what happiness means in the utilitarian sense, the telishment argument itself, what points of contention the tellishment argument brings up against utilitarianism, and finally, what utilitarianism has to say in its own defense.…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    4. How might utilitarianism be used to resolve dilemma 4 (pg. 132 of Jones)? Do you agree with this resolution? Why or why not?…

    • 1308 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In John Stuart Mill’s influential book “Utilitarianism”, Mill introduces the belief that moral action is based upon the concept of utility, or how he explains it, the greatest happiness principle. It is this greatest happiness principle that defines Utilitarianism as the notion that the best moral actions are those that promote the most amount of human happiness. Actions that would be regarded as the least favorable are those that promote the opposite, unhappiness. The concept of Utilitarianism and that of Consequentialism are similar as both judge the moral value of an action dependent on its consequences, however each claim leads to different conclusions.…

    • 1497 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Deontology is a famous meta-ethical theory practiced among famous philosophers such as Immanuel Kant, W.D. Ross, Sissela Bok, and many other philosophers and influential people we know. Deontology is focused on “duty” based actions. The entire theory is focused on the duty of people and how they submit to the duty that they have. It is simply defined as duty is the basis of morality. It is also focused around looking at the consequential effects of a particular action that is done.…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    An example would be if someone robs a bank and shot fires at people without killing anyone. In a utilitarian mind -set we should kill this person who didn’t kill anyone.…

    • 1376 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism is centered around the idea that the right action is the one that promotes the most utility, otherwise known as happiness. Because of this, utilitarianism is grounded in the foundational value of happiness. All instrumental values derive their worth from foundational values; therefore, anything that promotes happiness is valuable. Foundational values can explain other prescriptive claims or value claims. Under utilitarianism, any claims that are correctly made are those that are grounded in happiness and promote the most utility.…

    • 1232 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism and Libertarianism on the Redistribution of Resources When it comes to the government, the president, and their cabinet tries to govern the United States in the best way that he or she can; however, it’s understood by some that this individual can not please every citizen. For instance, in the United States, there is a huge income gap between the rich and the poor. Many individuals feel like the government should try to redistribute some resources to the poor; however, others disagree with the methods to reduce the gap. The government tries it’s best to minimize individuals from suffering for trying to maximize other individual’s happiness. In this situation, only one can win unfortunately pertaining to the income gap.…

    • 1797 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarian Ethical Theory

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In fact, Baker Bill, (24), asserts that in Utilitarian theory, “the good is measured in terms of consequences of the action.” However, Chonko Larry (5) splits utilitarian theory…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What is Utilitarianism? Utilitarianism is a philosophical concept that holds an action to be held right if it tends to promote happiness for the greatest number of people. Utilitarian’s define the morally right actions as those actions that maximize happiness and minimize misery. Many believe that utilitarianism is an unrealistic theory. Arguments and responses to utilitarianism being too demanding have been made John Stuart Mill and Peter Singer.…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    But when you try to apply utilitarian ethics in a small scale decision affecting a couple of people when we to the calculations come to a solution that goes against our intuition for one example that we got in class is of a couple deciding where they should go to eat. The guy wants to go to restaurant A (intensity +7) while she does not want to (-2 equaling 5). She wants to try restaurant B (+3) but he is mostly apathetic to the idea (+1 equaling 4). Even though our intuition says let’s go to restaurant B because nobody is necessarily against the idea of restaurant B a utilitarian equation says that we should go to restaurant A, even if it seems incorrect.…

    • 1459 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Through Mill’s view on Utilitarianism there emerges a core moral theory called the greatest happiness principle. However, I believe that Mill’s Greatest Happiness Principle is false. I believe this because after examining his theory I noticed several flaws within his theory. Before I say what is wrong with Mill’s argument and theory I want to address the definition of the greatest happiness principle and what all it encompasses. Mill believes that “actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, [and] wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness” (Mill,97).…

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Because rule utilitarianism relies on moral rules to determine the permissibility of actions, it has the resources to avoid the problems act utilitarianism faces concerning individual rights by establishing rules that prohibit infringement of individual rights. For instance, one should not enslave others because, in most instances, slavery has more negative outcomes than not enslaving others. Therefore if not enslaving others was a rule, rule utilitarianism would consider all slavery immoral, regardless if individual cases of slavery would yield more good outcomes. In more instances than not, violating individual rights results in a lower utility, therefore, the majority of moral rules align with our individual rights and intuitive moral verdicts. Thus, rule utilitarianism has the resources to prohibit the problems that act utilitarianism faces concerning infringement of individual rights.…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ethical Framework Utilitarianism is an ethical theory that I feel aligned to personally. Utilitarianism states that the ethical choice is the one that provides the greatest amount of good for the greatest amount of people, even if that choice isn’t the best for everyone. Much of our politics are conducted using this approach, making decisions and laws that increase the amount of good while also reducing the amount of harm that is done. I believe this to be the most practical approach to most situations, especially when it comes to government. This is because it is virtually impossible to meet the needs or wants of every single person, so doing the greatest amount of good for the greatest amount of people is ultimately what is best for the community.…

    • 1487 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I will argue that Utilitarianism will never be seen as the correct moral philosophy and with good reason. Throughout this paper, I will be talking about the Trolley Problem developed by British philosophy Philippa Foot in 1967. This problem, in its simplest form, is deciding whether it is more morally correct to passively kill five people or actively kill one person. For the purposes of my depiction of it, the notion of actively versus passively killing someone will not be relevant for the moment. Instead, it will should always be assumed that this fact isn’t important, it just is a matter of which group dies and which group lives.…

    • 1809 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Introduction: Business was started by Shell in Nigeria in 1937 as Shell darcy and was given a license of exploration .Olioberi was the first commercial oil field discovered in the Niger Delta. Prior to discovery of oil, Nigeria depended on agricultural exports to other countries. The largest fossil fuel company in Nigeria is Shell Petroleum Development Company, which operates over 6000 kms. The villages’ individuals surrounding facilities of oil production occasionally drill holes into pipelines for purposes of arresting oil and transferring it illegally out of Nigeria (Begby, 2012). His procedure called oil bunkering is projected to cost Nigeria as much as 400000 barrels.…

    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays