Mill Utilitarianism

Superior Essays
Bernard Williams, co-author of Utilitarianism: For and Against, presents a powerful and constant critique on utilitarian ideals, assumptions and arguments. He finds that the poor theory of action stated by utilitarianism, fails to interact with the real problems of moral and political philosophy at a crucial level that is needed. As well as, fails to make sense of notions such as integrity, or even human happiness itself. Considering what John Stuart Mill presented in his essay regarding utilitarianism, Mills would instruct Jim to do what would cause the ‘most amount of happiness’. Since the majority of the protesters is crying out to kill one to save the rest, Mill would suggest that, “that action are morally right only if and because they …show more content…
Mill, who ultimately gives an answer, Kant considers the opposite regarding a situation like this. In Immanuel Kant’s book, Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals, Kant “does not aim to tell you what you should do or how to lead your life” (Yount, Kant, Conscience, and Duty). Kant feels as though one should already know or have said knowledge to begin with. In saying this, Kant believes “that without a good will one can’t even be worthy of being happy” (Kant). The only thing in the world that is absolutely good is the idea of good will, such as the qualities of good fortune or qualities of spirit may be used for good or bad purposes in a person’s life. By contrast, a good will is essentially ‘good’, even if it may fail to bring about positive results. According to Kant, “whenever you act for a reason […], the reason must be necessitate your act if it is to motivate and explain your act” (Yount, Kant, Conscience, and Duty). In this situation, Kant would ask Jim what his motivating principle might be and is he doing this for ‘good’? The main purposes of each individual are assumed to be the fulfillment of happiness and self-preservation. Indeed, people are often less happy than the masses with a precise space for a reason. As a result, the common people look at reason with contempt, while the refined people are often jealous of the masses. The fact is that reason serves to provide purposes that are higher than individual happiness and survival. The reason 's function is to bring out a will that is good within itself as opposed to good for any specific purpose, such as the fulfillment of happiness. The motivating principle or the maxim in this situation would be saving the lives of these prisoners. Typically, it means that the moral worth of your action lies in your motive for choosing and acting on that maxim, which could possibly be the prisoners’ lives. “Kant contends to be morally motivated is to be motivated simple by Practical Reason” (Yount,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The theory of Utilitarianism is very vulnerable to criticism due to its reliance on vague underlying principles that leave many questions unanswered. The Utilitarianism ideology is grounded in three simple propositions. First off, actions are solely deemed right if they result in the best consequences. Secondly, the only way consequences are assessed are by how much happiness and unhappiness they cause.…

    • 148 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He states, “if the greatest happiness of all is the end of human action, it must be the standard of morality.” (11) Opponents to this theory state that happiness is unattainable, and humans can do without it. Mill responds to this by clarifying that utilitarianism is not only the pursuit of happiness, but “the prevention of lessening happiness.” (11) Therefore, Mill concludes that utilitarianism is more necessary if happiness is unattainable.…

    • 1076 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Final Exam 1. In “A Critique of Utilitarianism”, Bernard Williams argues against the fundamental characteristics of utilitarianism and believes that the notion of ends justifying the means are a way of representing the doctrine of negative responsibility which can lead to consequences from the choices we make/do not make (663). As a result, we are all responsible for the consequences that we fail to prevent as well as the ones we brought upon ourselves. That is, in each case the choice on whether an action is right is determined by its consequences (661). Williams gives the example of killing one villager to save 19 others (664) in which he critiques the different principles of utilitarianism and integrity - the moral righteousness that is…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tellishment Argument

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages

    What is the moral theory of utilitarianism? According to Vaughn, “[Utilitarianism is] the view that right actions are those that result in the greatest overall happiness for everyone involved” (Vaughn, 79). At face value such a moral theory sounds great, because it should promote general happiness. While this is true, a particular argument, the telishment argument, shows that utilitarianism is not a viable moral theory because it promotes decisions that run contrary to historical moral inclinations. To prove this is the case, this paper will first dive into what happiness means in the utilitarian sense, the telishment argument itself, what points of contention the tellishment argument brings up against utilitarianism, and finally, what utilitarianism has to say in its own defense.…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It is believed that it is too strict a requirement for Utilitarianism to imply that we should always act solely to maximize happiness. It is then asking too much of people to be always centrally focused on promoting happiness for the general human population. Mill responds to such criticism by stating that “…no system of ethics requires that the sole motive of all we do shall be a feeling of duty,” but rather that “utilitarian moralists have gone beyond almost everyone in asserting that the motive has nothing to do with the morality of the action though it has much to do with the worth of the agent.” (13) This therefore, asserts that the motives behind an action will have nothing to do with whether or not we should complete an action solely based on its morality. He states that the great majority of these good actions are intended not for the benefit of the world, but for that of its…

    • 1497 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Let us begin by formally defining act utilitarianism: a theory of right action that defines the act to be “right if and only if, and because, its consequences contain at least as large a net balance of wellbeing minus ill-being as those of any alternative possible act in that situation” (Frick, Lecture 1 Slides). And thus, an act utilitarian, when making decisions regarding human life, looks solely at the net difference in wellbeing and ill-being. I would like to call attention to the impersonality — which I believe to be the strongest objection to act utilitarianism— that results from this process of quantifying happiness, as it disregards perspectives of the individual as well as the intrinsic value of human life. Take, for example, the moral dilemma caused by the fat man in the trolley problem as presented by Thomson in “Killing, Letting Die, and the Trolley Problem.” The situation with the fat man is essentially as follows:…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What is Utilitarianism? Utilitarianism is a philosophical concept that holds an action to be held right if it tends to promote happiness for the greatest number of people. Utilitarian’s define the morally right actions as those actions that maximize happiness and minimize misery. Many believe that utilitarianism is an unrealistic theory. Arguments and responses to utilitarianism being too demanding have been made John Stuart Mill and Peter Singer.…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Mill “Actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness” (John Stuart Mill). In its simplest form utilitarianism can be defined as actions morally permissible if and only if they produce at least as much net happiness as any other available action. Its core idea is that whether actions are morally right or wrong depends on their effects. When making a decision for one’s self he/she must consider what will bring themselves the most happiness. When making a decision that will affects other…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In efforts to find summum bonum or the ultimate good, philosophers during the 20th century began to investigate ethical issues, and tried to create their own versions of an ideal moral code. During this time, John Stuart Mill and Peter Singer base their ethical beliefs in the philosophy of utilitarianism. Both Mill’s essay Utilitarianism and Singer’s work Famine, Affluence and Morality explore the pursuit of happiness and its relation to moral philosophy. The doctrine of utilitarianism emphasizes the consequences of one’s actions as they add to the sum total of happiness.…

    • 1033 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Examples Of Utilitarianism

    • 1367 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Utilitarianism is based on the The Greatest Happiness Principle, which states that people should act in accordance towards maximizing one’s pleasure, while minimizing one’s pain. This is also relevant in a communal setting focusing on benefitting the majority of a group. The two philosophers that will be discussed are: Elizabeth Anscombe and Jeremy Bentham. The Anscombian point of view protests against the use of murder as a means to an end. The Bentham-style utilitarian abides by The Greatest Happiness Principle, which believes that murder is justifiable if it benefits the group.…

    • 1367 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Mill's Utilitarianism

    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Mill’s Utilitarianism is a seemingly simple yet quixotic approach to the issue of what makes a moral action. Mill believes that the goodness of a moral action depends on the amount of happiness it creates. However, critics find issue with this principle because if the end result of maximizing happiness is all that matters, unjust actions such as murder are moral as long as they maximize happiness. Despite his efforts of ameliorating this problem with his concept of justice, his use of justice is inherently flawed.…

    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the 1800s, a secular theory emerged called Utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is a practical way of making ethical decisions without using any religion or faith to come up with whether something is right or wrong but rather focuses on the consequences of the actions (Ruddell, 2004). When using utilitarianism a person is evaluating the consequences and determining how much good will be generated versus how much pain will be caused by the decision. Mill’s is one of the people associated with developing the utilitarianism approach and his theory is that something can be good when it produces the greatest amount of good for the greatest amount of people (Ruddell, 2004). This theory can be looked at in two different ways the first is that it focuses on the well-being and good of the many verses the elite and powerful.…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Morality through happiness, while preventing pain, is the major concept of John Stuart Mill’s Utilitarianism. In this edition of his writing, Mill talks about Utility’s “greatest happiness principle” and the logic that flows behind it. The critical ideas that come out of Utilitarianism is the idea of happiness as as the end moral goal and that Utilitarians recognize sacrifice for the greater good.…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Bernard Williams’s example of the moral dilemma involving Jim killing the one individual to save 19 is an interesting one that provokes much thought and it is a decision that utilitarian followers would find quite easy. Utilitarian’s subscribe to the view that everything that you do or do not do should be for the sake of maximizing total happiness, or utility. But individuals who subscribe to a different moral philosophy could potentially have a myriad of ethical concerns associated with making such a decision. In this paper, I will explain the moral dilemma that is presented in Bernard Williams’s piece, hypothesize what the utilitarian would do in that situation, why they would choose to do that. I will also demonstrate why Williams’s dilemma provides valid evidence to reject utilitarianism on the grounds that it weakens a person’s integrity, sense of responsibility, and their moral character.…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism is a powerful philosophy and a key component in the study of ethics. While Jeremy Bentham’s “the greatest good for the greatest number” take on utilitarianism is extremely questionable and squanders minority rights, John Stuart Mill provides a more agreeable vision of utilitarianism that proves practical in today’s world. Kelsey Timmerman’s autobiography Where Am I Wearing explores this discussion in his quest to discover the source of his clothes. Most of his travels visit developing nations plagued with poverty, encountering some extremely challenging circumstances that elicit controversial discussions. In these circumstances, his thoughts often underline utilitarianism’s role in globalization.…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays