This case study clearly shows that world hunger requires more of practical solutions rather than philosophical principles that are so ideal that they can never be applied to such a serious case as refugees’ food problem. The principle (a utilitarian principle) that shapes the essence of Peter Singer’s argument is about the obligation that ALL people have to sacrifice whatever is insignificant compared to the issue in order to address the issue. This principle is not in the favor donors argument about that “we've already given WFP money” because saving millions of people’s life is more important than what the donors need their money for, which as Singer stated is mostly for projects that are symbolic (such as building skyscrapers as companies’
