Examples Of Direct Utilitarianism

Improved Essays
Utilitarianism is an ethical theory that is commonly associated with the saying “the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people” (Blackburn page 82). However, there are two contrasting theories within utilitarianism: Bentham’s direct utilitarianism and Mill’s indirect utilitarianism. Direct utilitarianism (otherwise known as act utilitarianism) is a theory that was contrived by Jeremy Bentham. Direct utilitarianism incorporates the idea that the amount of pain or pleasure that will result from a certain act can be mathematically calculated by adding up certain factors. These factors include the act’s subjective intensity, its duration, the probability of it happening, its nearness or remoteness from an agent in time and its effect …show more content…
Indirect utilitarianism is a less demanding approach to utilitarianism but also follows the idea of greatest happiness for the greatest number of people. Mill’s theory states that one must live by a set of rules, and this set of rules, if followed by everyone, would result in the greatest amount of happiness. These rules can either be derived from simple common sense, or from a person who is identified as wise and would likely to have a string following. Indirect utilitarianism is more broadly focused and less rigid than direct utilitarianism. indirect utilitarianism states you must follow your set of rules unless there is an emergency (page 90). An example of this is rolling through a red light, using direct utilitarianism one would never be allowed to go through a red light, unless there is an emergency such as a firetruck going to stop a fire.

Direct utilitarianism is focused on specific acts, and how those acts will affect people’s happiness. One example of this is a sports match: if the majority of people watching or playing the match would gain more pleasure from a referee breaking a rule, breaking that rule would be in accordance with direct utilitarianism. However, this is not the case for indirect utilitarianism, as the referee must be completely consistent with the set rules of the game, unless s there is an emergency in which case he could cancel
…show more content…
Within indirect utilitarianism one must live by a certain set of rules, which would lead to the greatest amount of happiness if everyone followed them. If adultery was within this set of rules it would not cause the greatest good for the greatest number of people. Ralph tries to justify his actions by stating that if no one found out, everyone would be happy. However, if everyone lived by a set of rules where adultery was encouraged, everyone would be aware of the distinct possibility that their partner might be unfaithful to them. This would lead to extremely possessive and anxious partners, and would create an atmosphere of suspicion and mistrust; which would not result in more happiness. Ralph has aspects of utilitarianism in his justification, but his argument is not consistent with either direct or indirect

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    And lastly, every individual’s happiness is equally important. Jeremy Bentham’s theory’s dependence on these three frail and open-ended motions, illustrate why Utilitarianism is among the weakest of the ethical theories. Its greatest downfall is that the theory misunderstands the essence of happiness as it neglects the fact that happiness…

    • 148 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Utilitarianism is a normative philosophy of ethics that has been around since the late eighteenth century. It earliest proponents were Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill. The general idea of utilitarianism is that there is no morality measurement except results. So, when one is deciding how to act, the only thing that matters is what the results of the actions are. Utilitarianism says that the actions that cause the most happiness and the least amount of unhappiness or pain are the moral acts.…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    4. How might utilitarianism be used to resolve dilemma 4 (pg. 132 of Jones)? Do you agree with this resolution? Why or why not?…

    • 1308 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Utilitarianism is based on the consequences resulting from actions. Moral actions solely rely on the resulting consequences. Pleasures vary regarding quality and quantity. However, utilitarianism theory gives the quality aspect an upper hand. “Human beings are not satisfied with pleasures they have because they consider them to be of low quality” (Rosen, 2005.…

    • 96 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Also, another version that can be viewed as indirect is rule Utilitarianism. Rule Utilitarianism identifies the right action that maximises the greater number of people (Cave 2011…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In John Stuart Mill’s influential book “Utilitarianism”, Mill introduces the belief that moral action is based upon the concept of utility, or how he explains it, the greatest happiness principle. It is this greatest happiness principle that defines Utilitarianism as the notion that the best moral actions are those that promote the most amount of human happiness. Actions that would be regarded as the least favorable are those that promote the opposite, unhappiness. The concept of Utilitarianism and that of Consequentialism are similar as both judge the moral value of an action dependent on its consequences, however each claim leads to different conclusions.…

    • 1497 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What is Utilitarianism? Utilitarianism is a philosophical concept that holds an action to be held right if it tends to promote happiness for the greatest number of people. Utilitarian’s define the morally right actions as those actions that maximize happiness and minimize misery. Many believe that utilitarianism is an unrealistic theory. Arguments and responses to utilitarianism being too demanding have been made John Stuart Mill and Peter Singer.…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Mill “Actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness” (John Stuart Mill). In its simplest form utilitarianism can be defined as actions morally permissible if and only if they produce at least as much net happiness as any other available action. Its core idea is that whether actions are morally right or wrong depends on their effects. When making a decision for one’s self he/she must consider what will bring themselves the most happiness. When making a decision that will affects other…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Utilitarianism is an ethical theory based on the greatest good for the greatest number of people. The moral philosopher Bentham wanted decisions to be made that would result in the most pleasure. It is also based on the final outcome, so for something to be considered right or wrong, it is determined by the consequences. This theory does not…

    • 1285 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    But when you try to apply utilitarian ethics in a small scale decision affecting a couple of people when we to the calculations come to a solution that goes against our intuition for one example that we got in class is of a couple deciding where they should go to eat. The guy wants to go to restaurant A (intensity +7) while she does not want to (-2 equaling 5). She wants to try restaurant B (+3) but he is mostly apathetic to the idea (+1 equaling 4). Even though our intuition says let’s go to restaurant B because nobody is necessarily against the idea of restaurant B a utilitarian equation says that we should go to restaurant A, even if it seems incorrect.…

    • 1459 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What I mean is that in simplistic utilitarianism if there is a situation where killing one person could save four then that is what a simplistic utilitarian would do but an indirect rule utilitarian may consider it but would not do it because there is a law that specifically says murder is bad. To me it means that the laws already in place are designed to help bring about the greatest happiness for the majority and as long the majority follow these rules then they will work so an indirect rule utilitarian will do what they can to follow these rules. Now an indirect utilitarian will also examine moral rules however these may vary based on the culture. For instance from what I understand, bribery in some cultures is an accepted tradition and can even be considered rude if you do not offer some form of bribe. However for an indirect utilitarian in an American culture the rule about bribery in the code of ethics should be followed.…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism states that good is what brings the most happiness to people. Mill also believes that people are not satisfied with just physical pleasures, but they strive to achieve pleasure of the mind as well. There are two main types of utilitarianism including act utilitarianism and rule utilitarianism. Act utilitarianism focuses on the consequences of specific actions of a human person in a particular situation and rule utilitarianism suggests that the principle of utility can be used to generate and test rules can be employed is similar situations. The assumption is that if we follow a set of rules that give us the best consequences our actions will result in the greater good for everyone around us.…

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Rule Utilitarianism

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Stealing to survive How would a utilitarian respond to the dilemma of stealing to survive? Utilitarianism is a normative theory and a teleological approach to morality. The theory states that motives do not matter and that the consequences are the only thing that should make you carry out an act. The foundation of utilitarianism is the Greatest Happiness Principle which has three sections.…

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In “Utilitarianism,” John Stuart Mill argues that consequences of an action are all that really matter. Defining utilitarianism at its core, is a theory holding that the moral rightness and/or wrongness of an action depends entirely on the consequences of that action. Thereby agreeing that an action or decision is considered good if it generates happiness and bad if it generates the reverse. In his ethical approach, Mill suggests that the measure of success and happiness depends on how many people and how much happiness was developed as a result of that action, or the “greatest happiness principle.” This principle, Mill declares, “holds that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness; wrong as they tend to produce the…

    • 1398 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism focuses on the consequences of an action. Endowing to the classical utilitarian moral theory, we classify human acts or practices as we consider neither the nature of the acts or practices nor the motive for which people do what they do. This can harvest to one’s action; that a life conceivably is saved, which matters morally. There is no total distinction between what is right and what is wrong based on Bentham’s view, only if the consequences are the highest favorable for the person’s greatest happiness, even including the majority of the people related to this person who is responsible to give that action. Drawing a conclusion about utilitarianism, it is our duty to decide which action or practice is best by considering the likely or actual consequences of each substitute.…

    • 1521 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays