Us Crime Problem

Improved Essays
There are copious factors that come into play when speaking about why people commit crime and what exactly is the crime problem in the United States. U.S. crime problems could be defined as overcrowded jails, repeat offenders, and overloaded court systems that cost the United States billions of dollars annually. Let’s investigate three major reasons why U.S. crime problems are not a result of our failure to get tough on crime. They are the “dark figure” of crimes, drug addiction, and recidivism.
Let’s being with the “dark figure” of crime. Police officers deal directly with very few of the actual crimes occurring in their jurisdiction. White (2007) states, “The NCVS (National Crime Victimization Survey) indicates that only 39 percent of all
…show more content…
Victims might fear the police, fear retaliation, suffer from embarrassment, or they just don’t believe the police can accomplish anything. This problem of not reporting crimes to the police even has a name which is the “dark figure” of crime. Therefore, U.S. crime problems are not due to a lack of getting tough on crime. Conversely, it may just be a lack of crimes being reported. Crimes that are never investigated and criminals that are never punished are a real issue. The problem of not reporting such a high percentage of crimes just ends up empowering the criminal and stifling the abilities of criminal justice system.

Secondly, drug use (alcohol, prescription medication, illicit drugs) and crimes caused as a result of drug use or addiction, causes several people to serve lengthy prison sentences. This is a major issue since simply punishing someone for a drug offense is not dealing with issues of addiction. Webster Dictionary defines addiction as “broadly: persistent compulsive use of a substance known by the user to be harmful”. Courts can increase fines and the length of prison time all they want, but without specifically addressing the issue of addiction, the root of the
…show more content…
faces in regards to recidivism rates. According to Mears (2016), “Recently, for instance, a Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) national assessment of recidivism rates among prisoners released from thirty states in 2005 found that, within five years of release, 77% of prisoners were rearrested for a felony or serious misdemeanor, 55% were reconvicted of a new crime, and 28% were sent to prison for a new crime. The three-year levels of recidivism were nearly identical to those reported from a previous BJS assessment undertaken in 2002” (p. 89). As a nation, we have had the war on drugs, removed much of the judge’s discretionary power in sentencing, and mandated specific sentence lengths for specific crimes. None of these changes have put a dent in our extreme recidivism rates. Getting tougher on crime is not going to lower are recidivism rates and certainly is not going to address our nation’s crime problems. According to Mears (2016), “For example, recent studies that employ methodologically rigorous analyses have found little effect of time served on re-offending among juveniles or adults” (p.91). Revisiting drug addiction, one can notice that without dealing with the problem of addiction, recidivism rates are going to continue to remain at an unreasonable level. Providing counseling, job workshops, classes on substance abuse, increasing the use of probation, and legalizing marijuana usage could undoubtedly help the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    A Government Accountability Office found that thirteen out of seventeen drug courts recording “post-program recidivism,” or the tendency for a criminal to commit the same crime after release from a rehabilitation program, measured a decrease between four and twenty-five percent (142). These three instances prove that drug courts really do decrease the percentage of rearrests.…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mandatory Minimums

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages

    According to the National Council on Alcoholism and Drug Dependence “at the most intense levels of drug use, drugs and crime are directly and highly correlated and serious drug use can amplify and perpetuate preexisting criminal activity”. Taking this into consideration, it is not hard to understand why so many people are in support of more severe sentences in response to drug related crimes. While the effectiveness of the use of mandatory minimums to reduce drug related crimes is questionable, supporters of mandatory minimums make some compelling arguments that apply to all mandatory minimums not just those set on drug…

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It seems that within our society it is easier to lock someone up for their substance use disorder rather than helping them to overcome it. Essentially what we are doing is locking up the issue itself. In a study conducted in Spain it showed that individuals who were given mandatory community treatment rather than incarceration had decreased rates of recidivism (Garcia-Jiménez, Godoy-Fernandez, Llor-Esteban, and Ruiz-Hernández, 2014). Scientific studies have shown that treatment programs help drug abusers change attitudes, beliefs, and how they behave; more importantly it helps prevent relapse. Studies have also shown that after treatment an individual changes their lives completely; they do not have substance use disorder nor do they conduct in criminal activity that would result in incarceration (NIH,…

    • 1816 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the last few decades, the U.S. population of incarcerated citizens exploded from around 300,000 to more than 2 million, with drug convictions accounting for a majority of the increase. The War on Drugs functions more realistically as…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although, many do think this policy is great for war on drugs and war on crime, it has been shown in many studies that the levels of crime are not going down. The problem with that, though, is the amount of people in prisons is skyrocketing. "The research conducted by social scientists and legal scholars over the past four decades has provided compelling evidence that the changes in sentencing policies and practices filled our prisons to…

    • 1485 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Drug Courts

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Specialized courts have been instrumental in deviating the impact of overpopulated and taxed prison systems. Accordingly, they provide an environment that allows drug abusers to correct their behavior and lessen recidivism for similar crimes (Drug Courts, n.d.). The advantage of having a drug courts improve the treatment an offender gets and allows them to take charge over the positive changes in their day-to-day lives. The National Institute of Justice has found that recidivism rates drop significantly around 17%-26% depending of the programs used and assignment of judges over the length of time done (Do Drug Courts Work? Findings From Drug Court Research, n.d.).…

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    McCoy (2010) demonstrates that drug courts was established to prevent drug-related crime, help individuals get off using drugs, and help addicts become normal United States citizens. Rempel, Green and Kralstein (2012) argues “[…] their potential to reduce incarceration lies in their impact on recidivism, leading to fewer future cases on which long periods of incarceration might otherwise have been imposed” (Rempel, Green and Kralstein, 2012, p.190). Rempel, Green and Kralstein (2012) demonstrated that the drug court intervention should not be considered for an alternative to incarceration, right away because this based on their findings, more research needs to be conducted to further provide evidence. Sullivan and Hamilton (2007) argues “[…] that although slight increases in substance use prevalence may not precipitate immediate changes in criminal behavior it may induce later increases in crime” (Sullivan and Hamilton, 2007, p.514). Sullivan and Hamilton (2007) demonstrates that there tends to be a gradual decline in criminal behavior leading to a decrease in substance…

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Drug Courts Recidivism

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Due to the implications of Reagan's War on Drugs laws, drug courts have demonstrated and proven to reduce recidivism for offenders who abuse substances. To deter overcrowding in the prisons, Researcher Messer has found that drug courts can be instrumental in deterring offenders from reoffending. It is surprising that “85% of offenders incarcerated require substance abuse treatment” (Messer, 2016). Drug courts allow offenders to “attain important skills/ideas, improve relationships with family and children, a general educational development certificate, a driver’s license, and/or gainful employment” (Messer, 2016). Researcher Shaffer studied over “80 drug courts and found recidivism rates of 46% for those who participated in drug court programming”…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As crime rates have continued to decline, especially in the recent years, criminal justice policy continues increase, therefore, leading to new social problems, such as a growth in the prison population, increased expenditures, and lengthier prison sentences. Over these decades, however, there clearly has been a cause for concern about the lack of accountability and evidence based practice in criminal justice policy in which is needed in order to justify these new social problems and the significant increases in the criminal justice system. Despite these calls for greater accountability and evidence based policy, a large gap continues to remain between these ideals and the realization of them (Mears, 2010). Evidently, these issues are in…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Crime In Prison

    • 1269 Words
    • 6 Pages

    However, although crime has decreased, drug use has not decreased, and imprisonment rates are growing more drastic. Between 1993 and 1996, serious crime decreased by 5% and adult arrests increased by 12%, but adult arrests for serious crime only increased by 3%; in contrast, arrests for less serious crimes, like drug possession, grew by 14% (Cunniff 9). Yet despite the lack of impact of anti-drug programs, the government continues to take the same approach. Even despite the increase in prison populations, there are little to no regulations of prison populations (Schlanger 199). Clearly, the federal government must discontinue the emphasis on drug sentences and begin to put more effort into decreasing prison populations.…

    • 1269 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Causes Of Prison Overcrowding

    • 1400 Words
    • 6 Pages
    • 4 Works Cited

    The judicial system was buckling down on different drug offenses such as crack-cocaine, marijuana and opium. In 1985 marijuana was marked as the nation’s “number one problem” when it came to drug abuse. More people started using excessive amounts of marijuana since there was a decriminalization law. Eventually, it reached a high of sixty-four percent; programs and treatments were brought upon such as D.A.R.E (Drug Abuse Resistance Education) and G.R.E.A.T (Gang Resistance Education and Training). These programs were not just for adults, these were mainly targeted towards the youth so they will be pushed in the right direction.…

    • 1400 Words
    • 6 Pages
    • 4 Works Cited
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During a time when the federal government has trillions in debt, it seems unethical and unintelligent to ignore the benefits and cost savings of helping people get the treatment they need rather than worsening everyone’s problems with incarceration. Several states have already taken considerable steps to divert people convicted of low-level drug offenses to treatment and other services. The California Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act of 2000 (SACPA) diverts people convicted of non-violent, drug-related crimes to community-based treatment, education, or training and probation. A fiscal evaluation estimated that for every $1 allocated to fund this program, $2.50 was saved. The resulting net savings to the state and local governments amounted to a staggering $173.3 million per year in avoided criminal justice costs, reduced trial court costs, and reduced arrest rates of participants.…

    • 1667 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The type of offender that would be affected by my change in criminal justice policy would be nonviolent drug offenders. It's important to note that the nonviolent drug offenders would only be drug users, not dealers. The proposed policy decriminalizes drug use and instead would impose fines and a probationary period for violators. By decriminalizing drug use, real change may occur. Instead of throwing addicts in jail, there will be a greater emphasis on rehabilitation.…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Correctional Ideology

    • 1878 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The previously discussed ideologies had several problems with the effects that they caused. The current correctional practices have problems that have caused the desire for crime prevention to become prevalent. “Almost all offenders are eventually released, however, and the problem returns unless it has been effectively treated while the offender was in prison” (Allen 57). The logic behind crime prevention is clear. Preventing crime is to prevent everything that follows the crime as well.…

    • 1878 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Policies enacted in this movement include mandatory minimum sentencing laws like three strikes and truth-in-sentencing. Three strikes laws take away judicial discretion, giving more sentencing power to the prosecutor because they decide what to charge the defendant with. Mandatory minimums often require life sentences for many offenders who are nonviolent and non-serious. These include many drug offenders, where a life sentence will take away any chance they have of getting better. Our current system doesn’t offer any help with addiction; the real reason why many are…

    • 1156 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays