# Urban Trees Case Study

*…show more content…*

In order to obtain accurate measurements, each group (two students) chose one species and assessed the mentioned indices on four individual trees in both constricted and non-constricted rooting areas (Figure

*…show more content…*

Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

Table 2 illustrates that there is a moderate correlation between constricted and non-constricted areas of DBH data, which is statistically significant at the 0.01 level (Tb = 0.366, p = 0.000). Moreover, a weak correlation is observed for LCR (Tb = 0.198, p = 0.017), which shows that there is a weak correlation between the average of LCR for constricted and non-constricted areas. Whereas, there are no correlation for CDBK, CT, and CC with Tb = 0.107, p = 0.207, Tb = -0.062, p = 0.445, and Tb = 0.084, p = 0.346,