Urban Trees Case Study
In order to obtain accurate measurements, each group (two students) chose one species and assessed the mentioned indices on four individual trees in both constricted and non-constricted rooting areas (Figure …show more content…
Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).
Table 2 illustrates that there is a moderate correlation between constricted and non-constricted areas of DBH data, which is statistically significant at the 0.01 level (Tb = 0.366, p = 0.000). Moreover, a weak correlation is observed for LCR (Tb = 0.198, p = 0.017), which shows that there is a weak correlation between the average of LCR for constricted and non-constricted areas. Whereas, there are no correlation for CDBK, CT, and CC with Tb = 0.107, p = 0.207, Tb = -0.062, p = 0.445, and Tb = 0.084, p = 0.346,