Studies prove that a negative learning environment can digress the healing process of someone who is experiencing psychological damage, and will damage someone’s mental illness even more (Holmes). Therefore, colleges need to continue to promote a safe atmosphere for their students if they want them to succeed. In University Wire’s article against trigger warnings, the author states “We can benefit from a place where people are forced not only to hear opposing arguments but also to think about them critically and analytically” (Demilia). If he truly wants this to be a reality, then safer learning zones must be a priority among colleges so that their students can perform at their highest ability. In order for change to occur, classrooms must be open to accommodating students with mental illness and allow them to feel as though they can participate …show more content…
Moreover, those who have the viewpoint that trigger warnings limit discussion are a part of the issue at hand. “Trigger warnings should serve as roadmaps, not roadblocks” states that consciously thinking about and discussing these issues could lead to more critical discussion and that students should focus more on education than their emotions (Demilia). However, the use of trigger warnings does not limit discussion or a student’s ability to think critically. In fact, the demand for trigger warnings never asks for removal of discussion. Once again, the main goal is simply to receive notice of what will be discussed ahead of time. College student Isabel Zayas argues “’This issue [about trigger warnings] is not about free speech. It is about accessibility’” (Schmidt). That being said, the opposing side tends to hide behind the idea that trigger warnings are encroaching on academic freedom, when in truth, it is not. College students like Zayas only request that they have access to trigger warnings on the courses that call for