Unlawful Acts Case Study

Improved Essays
As a prosecutor, reviewing the case of two juvenile males committing unlawful acts, I would take the time and consideration of how these teens punishment should be handled. Based on the details provided, the whole mix up occurred by a schoolmate spreading a rumor, which the 17 year old male was in use of using drugs and alcohol. However it seems that like the 16 year old male might have been influenced by his friend that is 17. In accordance to the information provided, the 16 year old steals his grandmother revolver, then both males at the time sets the victim up by selling him a speaker, but that ends up going downhill from the 17 year old shooting the victim instead. They teens flee the area and probably the state because they were later

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Case name: Rankin v. McPherson, 483 U.S. 378 (1987) Facts: Ardith McPherson was appointed a deputy in the Constable’s office of Harris County, Texas, on January 12, 1981. Her duties were only clerical. On March 30, 1981, McPherson discussed with her boyfriend, and fellow employee, a report about an attempt to assassinate the President of the United States. She made the remark “If they go for him again, I hope they get him”. Her remark was reported to Constable Rankin, who fired McPherson, even though she told him she did not mean anything by it.…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Every generation comes with its challenges. Linda J. Collier addresses a sympathetic and concerned audience as she uncovers an issue long swept under the rug: punishments of juveniles who commit adult crimes, such as murder, rape, etcetera. As a former university attorney and court appointed guardian for juveniles in legal trouble, she has firsthand knowledge of the ineffectiveness of the juvenile court system. While her use of thought provoking examples creates a strong argument, she fails to convince me that juveniles who commit serious crimes deserve to serve adult punishments. Collier begins her argument by recounting the incident of Mitchell Johnson and Andrew Golden, who had led a massacre in Jonesboro, Arkansas.…

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Consequently, they are more prone to risk taking and peer influence than adults; they think less about their future and express their emotions in more volatile ways. The juvenile system recognizes this distinct adolescent nature, and allows for recovery through developmentally appropriate programs, making young adults under eighteen better suited for the juvenile system rather than the adult system. However, when young law-breakers murder or rape someone, it is much more difficult call on whether they should be tried as adults or juveniles. The decision should be made on a case-by-case basis, depending on the severity, motive, and nature of the crimes. For example, a sixteen-year-old boy murdering his father to protect his sister warrants a different analysis than a case of a remorseless sixteen-year-old boy who murdered a mother and her two young children to steal a car.…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juveniles should be convicted as adults for violent crimes because they are in the age that they can commit external crimes against people. It has jurisdiction of teens that are in the range of 13 to 17 years old that commit crimes. First off, in the article On Punishment and Teen Killers By Jennifer jenkins explains that most Juveniles convicted as a crime are repeat offenders. For the same reason if juveniles do not get the punishment they deserve they would most likely do it again. Teens are enrolled to know what they are doing and know what is good and what is bad.…

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juvenile crime has took a big toll on the U.S. as it took a rise dramatically. Many of these juveniles are serving life sentences for petty crimes. These juveniles are just childish, young, and way too immature to know right from wrong. What is worse is that most of the juveniles are getting tried as adults at such a young age and can lead to ruining their lives. Although these individuals are criminals and should face the consequences they committed, trying these teens as adults can be a cruel punishment.…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The idea that teens should or should not be tried as adults, if they commit a felony has “stirred much opposition and controversy” over the years (Estudillo 3). A couple years ago, a 15 year old girl from Plymouth, Michigan was convicted because she and her boyfriend had plotted to kill her family so she could run away with her 23 year old, at the time, boyfriend. Roksana Sikorski, slit her brother’s throat and he woke their parents and their younger sister up with his screams. Michael Riveria was sitting outside their home, texting Roksana instructions. Although this example is extremely violent, this is a felony.…

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Juveniles in American societies should encounter the responsibility and consequence of being tried as adults, despite their age, when committing unspeakable, heinous crimes. In Richard A. Serrano’s article, Young killers serving life without parole may get chance at freedom, he introduces reasons why it is acceptable for juveniles to be tried as adults. Seranno lists, seventeen-year-old Johnny Freeman “raped a five-year-old and tossed her from a fourteenth-story window,” sixteen-year-old Peter Saunders “bludgeoned an elderly woman, then from prison mailed a bomb-like device to a judge,” and sixteen-year-old David Biro “marched a husband and his pregnant wife down their basement stairs and shot them both” (Serrano, paragraph 12). Although…

    • 2180 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When it comes to the criminal justice system, there are many varying elements that contribute to the process through which accused offenders are counseled. As is expected, there are also numerous moral and ethical disputes that come with the territory, such as whether or not children, or 'juveniles', should be tried as adults in court for the violent crimes they commit. Some may say any child over the age of five should know the difference between right and wrong; for an individual to plan out a crime and act on it, the punishment should fit the offense, no matter the age. However, there is a thin line between vice and neurosis when it comes to juveniles. The incarceration of individuals under the age of sixteen at adult correctional facilities…

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It’s a no brainer that when you do the crime, you have to pay the time. Although, what do we do when a twelve year old child beats a little girl to death? Do we still classify him as a juvenile, or should we put him to trial as an adult? This topic is a nationwide problem, and in my opinion, they should be tried as an adult, based off of their crimes. I feel that juveniles should be tried as adults based off of murder, sexual assault, or arson.…

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juveniles Should be Sentenced as Adults If someone brutally murdered someone you loved, would you want them to get away with it or serve justice for the crime they committed? Imagine you find out you're pregnant sister and her husband were brutally murdered in their home and the person responsible said it was just a “thrill kill” saying “he just wanted to see how it would feel to shoot someone”. Does a teeneager deserve to get away with this because of his age or deserve the adult punishment?…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the article Death Penalty for Teens, Frank W. Heft JR thinks that the death penalty is cruel and unusual punishment for teens. While David Smith thinks that the death penalty for teens is not cruel and unusual punishment, they both have different views points about this matter and they do not agree. Heft and Smith disagree on juvenile capital punishment in three different areas, physical maturity which includes age, state law versus federal law, and emotional maturity that refers to the ability to understand, and manage their emotions and the ability to respond to the environment in the appropriate manner. Because of their disagreement on age maturity, and emotional maturity, federal law and states law, it leaves the reader undecided…

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There have been many opinions on juveniles being convicted as adults on the crimes they have committed. When it comes to some of these harsh crimes, who could not punish the individual to the fullest? It does not matter how old a person is because everyone knows the difference between right and wrong. If someone is raised differently and believes it is okay to murder another human, than they cannot just change their mindset. An individual that makes and adult decision should have the same consequences.…

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juvenile Incarceration

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Good morning. Society is faced with an increasingly growing problem. The problem is that children and teens are committing heinous crimes at a young age. The question is, do we sentence these children and teens to incarceration for the rest of their lives, or do we instead try to rehabilitate these teens and children and find the root causes of these problems? Do we not give them a second chance and let them rot in prison, or do we rehabilitate them and help them become important members of society?…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sleepers Reflection

    • 1033 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The system would treat the boys as individuals who have violated the rights of another person by attempting to kill him. The boys are still young and knew nothing about the law however, they knew that it was wrong to cause harm to another person. If the boys were dealt with Retributive Justice, it would start by focusing on the offence then punishing the crime since it seeks to establish blames on the victim but it doesn’t always work…

    • 1033 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Dylan Lankford English II 12/12/16 “Arkansas” LOTF Essay There are many instances of children killing other kids, adults, and even their own family members. A tough question that countries and states have to decide is when these children should be accountable for their crimes. The age varies from country to country, some allowing kids to be responsible for criminal actions at the age of 7 while others are much higher such as 16, or 18. In the article “Arkansas Boys Who 5 are sentenced” by Rick Bragg discusses an incident where two boys shot and killed 5 people.…

    • 1509 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays