Universal Health Care Argumentative Essay

There is an issue growing in popularity that debates whether universal healthcare should be practiced in the United States. Many editorials have expressed their opinions using argumentations, counterarguments, and rhetorical appeals. They also use evidence to support their claims and reasons to why they are of the opinion that universal healthcare should be practiced or banned. As each editorial is commencing, the editorial banning universal healthcare is more effective. The two sides of the debate are practice of universal healthcare, the ban of universal health care, as well as compare and contrast of the two viewpoints.
The writer who is in support of the practice of universal healthcare uses this editorial to persuade others that universal …show more content…
The writer uses argumentation thoroughly throughout the editorial to refute the claims that support universal health care. They provide a counterargument that states universal health care is a good idea and will benefit humankind, but they disprove this claim through statistical evidence that shows the negative effects of universal healthcare. They use statistical evidence by stating, “Economics claim that more than two trillion dollars are spent on health care each year.” This statistical fact reveals itself through the rhetorical appeal of logos. They use a combination of logos, pathos, and ethos to display their viewpoint. Throughout the editorial, the author gives specific reasons why adopting the universal healthcare would be a step in the wrong direction. They provide evidence by stating, “…universal healthcare would cause the already ponderous cost of health care in the United States to increase even more. One proposal would take money from other areas and move it to pay for health care. This means that departments such as education or public defense would receive less money, which would have a negative impact on the country.” This statistical evidence provides the appeal of ethos and pathos, and also opens up another viewpoint for the readers. The examples that they list appeals to the readers sense of discomfort, leading them to change their point of view. The aid of rhetorical appeals are also revealed through precise word choice that may persuade their audience to agree with them. The argument in favor of banning universal healthcare has provided many persuading examples that make the argument strong; this argument as well as the argument in favor of universal healthcare have their similarities and their differences in how they are