The universal basic income means that the form of income from a social security system which all citizens or residents of a country receive money from their official government in order to support for their daily life. The autonomous workers mean that those workers can work by themselves and can control their working hours. This type of worker does not work in a company or industry. Also, there is another type of autonomous worker such as robotic workers become more popular in recent years. This worker can replace most of the human’s workers, but these are not human. When linking this robotic worker between the universal basic income, it will help people receive more from their government. I believe that the UBI needs to be consider to implemented
…show more content…
So these kind of autonomous workers should rely on UBI more than those who can earn more money per month. Why I knew this because I have found this kind of information from an outside source titled “Why Should We Support the Idea of Universal Basic
Income?” which was written from Santens, Scott. This writer states that “By guaranteeing everyone has at the very least, the minimum amount of voice with which to speak in the marketplace for basic goods and services, we can make sure that the basics needs of life -- those specific and universally important to all goods and services like food and shelter -- are being created and distributed more efficiently. It makes no sense to make sure 100% of the population gets exactly the same amount of bread. Some may want more than others, and some may want less. It also doesn't make sense to only make bread for 70% of the population, thinking that is the true demand for bread, when actually 80% of the population wants it, but 10% have zero means to voice their demand in the market. …show more content…
It is not means-tested, although it is subject to income tax. It is usually assumed to provide an equal payment to everyone, with a special rate for children.
The idea of replacing benefits and tax credits with UBI has huge intuitive appeal. No means-testing of benefits, and thus no families stuck in poverty traps where benefit withdrawal erodes any increase in earnings. No out-of-work claimants afraid to take up short-term job offers for fear of losing benefit entitlement. No intrusive testing of benefit eligibility, no punitive sanctions regime, no jobcentre advisers hassling people to apply for the lowest-paid jobs. No fraud and no gaming the system. Most of the bureaucracy of the welfare system swept away. And the possibility for everyone to take time out of employment as and when they want to and for as long as they want to, answerable to no one.” In this case, the UBI will not popular in most of the countries, people should apply for a job and does not want the support from the country. In summary, a country should encourage their citizen to apply for a job and the country also should create more new job that available for most of the human.
So these kind of autonomous workers should rely on UBI more than those who can earn more money per month. Why I knew this because I have found this kind of information from an outside source titled “Why Should We Support the Idea of Universal Basic
Income?” which was written from Santens, Scott. This writer states that “By guaranteeing everyone has at the very least, the minimum amount of voice with which to speak in the marketplace for basic goods and services, we can make sure that the basics needs of life -- those specific and universally important to all goods and services like food and shelter -- are being created and distributed more efficiently. It makes no sense to make sure 100% of the population gets exactly the same amount of bread. Some may want more than others, and some may want less. It also doesn't make sense to only make bread for 70% of the population, thinking that is the true demand for bread, when actually 80% of the population wants it, but 10% have zero means to voice their demand in the market. …show more content…
It is not means-tested, although it is subject to income tax. It is usually assumed to provide an equal payment to everyone, with a special rate for children.
The idea of replacing benefits and tax credits with UBI has huge intuitive appeal. No means-testing of benefits, and thus no families stuck in poverty traps where benefit withdrawal erodes any increase in earnings. No out-of-work claimants afraid to take up short-term job offers for fear of losing benefit entitlement. No intrusive testing of benefit eligibility, no punitive sanctions regime, no jobcentre advisers hassling people to apply for the lowest-paid jobs. No fraud and no gaming the system. Most of the bureaucracy of the welfare system swept away. And the possibility for everyone to take time out of employment as and when they want to and for as long as they want to, answerable to no one.” In this case, the UBI will not popular in most of the countries, people should apply for a job and does not want the support from the country. In summary, a country should encourage their citizen to apply for a job and the country also should create more new job that available for most of the human.