• Home Page
  • United States Vs Leon 1984 Case Study

United States Vs Leon 1984 Case Study

Improved Essays
Show More
The “United States v. Leon”(1984), is one of the major Supreme Court Cases in American history. It all started in Burbank, California when police officers became very suspicious on a well-known drug dealer Albert Leon. A search warrant was being used to search Leon’s home for any kind of evidence for drug trafficking. The police gathered as much evidence and investigation that could be found in drug trafficking. They had found a large amount of “illegal drugs” in the residence of Leon’s home. During the trial, Leon’s lawyer and District court found that the warrant was used improperly. Which means that there wasn’t enough evidence to get a search warrant on Albert. Leon’s lawyer used the fourth amendment in the trial stating that any kind

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    California Vs Turner Case Study
    • 1394 Words
    • 6 Pages

    California Vs Turner Case Study

    In case one, State of California vs Turner, Brock Turner, 20-year-old Caucasian male and was a resident in California was charged with rape of three out of five counts in 2015, penal code PC261 (a)(3), PC261 (a)(4), PC220 (a)(1), PC289 (e), PC289 (d) (Official California Legislative Information , 1993). Turner was found guilty in March of three felony charges: assault with intent to commit rape of an intoxicated/unconscious person PC220 (a)(1), penetration of an intoxicated person PC289 (e), and penetration of an unconscious person penal codes PC289 (d) (Court Motions/Orders Instructions/Minutes Chronolocial Order, 2015). None of the codes that he was charged did not include the intent “rape,” which may have led to the lower sentence then the max. So, Turner was sentenced with 6 months in jail instead of the max. The district attorney felt the punishment does not fit the crime (Fantz, 2016).…

    • 1394 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Dmak Dbq Analysis
    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Dmak Dbq Analysis

    A thermal scanner was used on the house of DLK without a warrant, in order to obtain evidence that DLK was illegally growing marijuana. DLK sued on the grounds that the scan was a search, and since there was no warrant, it violated his fourth amendment right. The government went too far by scanning DLK’s house because the scan indicated things about the house that would be unknown unless one entered the house, revealed things which DLK wished to keep private and took reasonable measures to protect, and was a violation of privacy. Thermal scanners indicate things about the house that would not be unknown unless one entered the house. They can show vents, rooms, and insulation abnormalities through heat build up.…

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    State Vs. Ramirez Case: State V. Chavez
    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages

    State Vs. Ramirez Case: State V. Chavez

    QUESTION PRESENTED 

 Whether Kaleigh Cyprus committed transfer intent with respect to Jack pursuant to A.R.S. section 13-203(B)(1) and State v. Ramirez . The phone was thrown towards another person involve, identified as Helena. In result it ended up hitting Jack BRIEF ANSWER 

 Yes, Kaleigh did commit assault because her intention was to throw the phone to Helena and with respect to Jack, she was not intentionally throwing the phone at him. Since Jack ended up sitting in that location and turning his head it resulted in the phone hitting him.…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    Us 622 Case Study
    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Us 622 Case Study

    US v Ruiz 536 US 622 PARTIES: Ruiz = Defendant US = Prosecution LEGAL CLAIM: Unlawful Possession of Drugs FACTS: - Angela Ruiz was arrested after immigration found 30 kilograms (66.2 lbs.) of marijuana in her suitcase. - Southern District of California gave her a “Fast Track” plea bargain. -…

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Minnesota Vs Dickerson Case Summary
    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Minnesota Vs Dickerson Case Summary

    Indeed, the Terry search principle was regarded, and the limit to which it was supposed to be conducted was reviewed, Terry vs. Ohio case. The court further went into other cases that had resolved issues on the fourth amendment and the Terry search (Minnesota v Dickerson, 1993). Indeed, in Michigan vs. Long, the Court held that in the context of that case, a Terry search allowed the search of the individual and passenger’s compartments of the automobile to ascertain beyond doubt that the defendant was not armed and dangerous. In limited cases, the Court held that when contraband is retrieved, then the officer cannot ignore the contraband as the Fourth Amendment does not suppress it under those circumstances. However, the court in Long had ruled that if police lacked probable cause in believing that the object in plain view was contraband then conducting a further search to make the object apparent would make the plain view doctrine unwarranted with the seizure of the contraband.…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Wilson Vs Arkansas
    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Wilson Vs Arkansas

    Issue- Whether it was reasonable under the 4th amendment for the officers to enter a home without a warrant. Rule- Knock and Announce rule law enforcement has to knock and announce that they are police and wait a reasonable amount of time, usually seconds, before entering place before they search. (Wilson v Arkansas)…

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    R. V. Hauser Case Study
    • 1686 Words
    • 7 Pages

    R. V. Hauser Case Study

    While studying the case R. v Hauser, it is clear to see why it is known to be one of the leading constitutional decisions in understanding the workings of Peace, order and good governments in relation to a power struggle of jurisdiction. The whole case surrounds the question on whether the Attorney General, or the Attorney General of Canada should have the power to control the prosecution under the Federal Narcotics Control Act. It is a battle for powers of jurisdiction in regards to the criminal code, and more so the Narcotics Control Act; (NCA), 1961. The Narcotics Act was once Canada’s national drug control statue prior to its repeal in 1996 where the Controlled Drugs and Substance Act took its place. The NCA upheld an international treaty which prohibited the production, and supply of specific drugs; normally narcotics, unless given a licence for specific…

    • 1686 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Achman Case Study
    • 748 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Achman Case Study

    During the search, police found things like a Uzi machine gun, a .38 caliber revolver, two stun guns, and a handcuff key, but did not find the supposedly stolen stuff. Police Officers did confiscate the weapons while in search for the stolen items and used it in court. So therefore his fourth amendment was violated. The 4th amendment states, "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. " This action performed by the police officers reminds me of the supreme court case, Mapp V. Ohio.…

    • 748 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    R V Gonzales Case Study
    • 1517 Words
    • 7 Pages

    R V Gonzales Case Study

    R v. Gonzales refers to a criminal case of a triple parricide by twenty year old Australian BOS: 28744455 Sef Gonzales which occurred on the 10th of July 2001. Sef’s motives for killing his father Teddy, Mother Mary Loiva and sister Clodine derived from his parent’s unattainable high expectations of him and his desire to financially benefit from their death. Having premeditated his crime, Sef entered Clodine’s room at 4pm armed with two kitchen knifes and a baseball bat and killed her. The cause of her death was the combined effect of the compression of her neck, the blunt force injuries and abdominal stab wounds. Sef’s mother arrived home an hour later and was ambushed in the living room by Sef, stabbing her multiple times, severing her windpipe.…

    • 1517 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    The Hallmark Case Of Gideon V. Wainwright
    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Hallmark Case Of Gideon V. Wainwright

    United States. In this case, the court ruled 5-3, declaring that the government’s ability to freeze a defendant 's non-tainted assets during a trial violated the constitution. This is relevant because the court reasoned that without access to proper funds, a defendant might not be able to provide themselves with adequate counsel for their trial. In Glossip v. Gross, the Supreme Court affirmed in a divided 5-4 judgement that the burden of proof required to classify Oklahoma’s use of midazolam, a sedative, as cruel and unusual punishment had indeed not been met. These recent instances of the Constitution’s interpretation have shed an ever growing light on how the American justice system works and the continuing understanding of the United States Constitution.…

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    Robinson V. California Case Study
    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Robinson V. California Case Study

    After having failed in the previous attempt to enter the house, the officers forcibly go in using a purported search warrant and searched the home in which crude materials were found. The rule of law in scrutiny was the violation of the American Constitution as explained in the Fourth Amendment. The law termed all evidence collected in violation of this amendment to be unacceptable and irrelevant in the court proceedings. Question…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Moot Court Case
    • 1647 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Moot Court Case

    DAVID FALLSBAUER’S RIGHTS UNDER THE FOURTH AMENDMENT WERE VIOLATED BY THE POLICE OFFICERS, BECAUSE WHEN FACED WITH AMBIGUITY REGARDING THE A THIRD PARTY’S CONSENT TO SEARCH THEY FAILED TO MAKE A FURTHER INQUIRY. BY DOING SO, THE OFFICERS VIOLATED DAVID’S RIGHT TO PRIVACY. The primary question before this Court is whether police officers must make a further inquiry when faced with an ambiguity regarding a third party’s consent to search. The Federal Circuit Courts of Appeals have taken different views when deciding the actions a police officer must take when faced with an ambiguity pertaining to third party consent. It is crucial to our society that a person’s right to privacy is protected and able to be exercised.…

    • 1647 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Fourth Amendment
    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Fourth Amendment

    Amendment IV The fourth amendment is one of the primitive and mainly significant entitlements bestowed to the citizens of The United State of America; the law, distinctively states, “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” What Does the Fourth Amendment Mean? The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution stipulates, the entitlement of individuals to be secure in their individualities, dwellings, documents, and possessions, against irrational searches…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Hernandez Vs Texas Case Study
    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Hernandez Vs Texas Case Study

    Introduction The case study involves Hernandez versus Texas this was a Mexican – American civil right case which was recorded as the first one. The case was listened by States Supreme Court this was after the Second World War. Historically it was around 1950. The case was involved murder the named Pete Hernandez who was a cotton picker was accused of killing Joe Espinosa. They were no Mexican who has served on the jury for more than twenty-five years.…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Powell V. Alabama Case
    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Powell V. Alabama Case

    The Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Eighth Amendments were established to protect the rights of the suspected, the accused, criminal defendants and that of convicted criminals. There have been several instances of the course time where these protections of rights haven’t been upheld. An example of when these protections of rights have been neglected is the Powell v. Alabama in 1932. There are several things that made this particular case so different from that of other cases. The time period, the series of events in the case, and the doctrines that were established during this time period are just a few to mention.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings