In Hass’s article, he describes the concept of basic sovereignty, which is the final authority and every right of a nation, insufficient to stabilize international order. With today’s disrupted international order, the globalizing world is filled with problems having to do with climate, network, chaos, and public health. This is because countries have had the same traditional sovereignty system, and it is time to evolve in the globalizing world. For so long, this operating system has been mainly about a state’s own protection and self-interest without considering other states’ needs. In today’s international order, the norms behind sovereignty are inadequate, as Hass claimed, “international order premised solely on respect for sovereignty,
…show more content…
It becomes difficult to stop foreign countries from producing more nuclear weapons when there is little international support for preventive actions as the author states, “Preventive actions could disrupt a country’s nuclear program before any weapons were produced…But there would be little international support...as it would be resisted by those governments that saw it as issuing a license to the United States to attack countries” (Hass, 2017, p. 4). As you can see there is not much military support against the opposing …show more content…
and North Korea, and Iran along with the main powers, IGO’s such as NATO, UN, security council. Non-IGOs include the World Health Organization. Other main actors are non-state actors such as terrorist groups in the Middle East. The United States operates at a global and interstate level because that includes their intervention in other countries through American diplomats as well as military force. The United States will have to aid, not directly, but rather have American policy makers and diplomats resolve issues with “greater emphasis placed on consultations over the contours of the international order” (Hass, 2017, pg. 9). The main powers operating at a global have difficulties working with each other’s governments. The author stated, “the international community is often invoked when in reality there is little evidence it exists” (Hass, 2017, pg. 9). North Korea and Iran operate at domestic and interstate level because both only seek for their self-interest. They could have sanctions placed on them due to proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, but such intervention will result in other governments viewing this as a, “license to the United States to attack countries such as North Korea or Iran” (Hass, 2017 pg. 4). This would help reducing the terrorist groups which work at a domestic and individual level. NATO and The UN work at a global level, these organizations could be more
It becomes difficult to stop foreign countries from producing more nuclear weapons when there is little international support for preventive actions as the author states, “Preventive actions could disrupt a country’s nuclear program before any weapons were produced…But there would be little international support...as it would be resisted by those governments that saw it as issuing a license to the United States to attack countries” (Hass, 2017, p. 4). As you can see there is not much military support against the opposing …show more content…
and North Korea, and Iran along with the main powers, IGO’s such as NATO, UN, security council. Non-IGOs include the World Health Organization. Other main actors are non-state actors such as terrorist groups in the Middle East. The United States operates at a global and interstate level because that includes their intervention in other countries through American diplomats as well as military force. The United States will have to aid, not directly, but rather have American policy makers and diplomats resolve issues with “greater emphasis placed on consultations over the contours of the international order” (Hass, 2017, pg. 9). The main powers operating at a global have difficulties working with each other’s governments. The author stated, “the international community is often invoked when in reality there is little evidence it exists” (Hass, 2017, pg. 9). North Korea and Iran operate at domestic and interstate level because both only seek for their self-interest. They could have sanctions placed on them due to proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, but such intervention will result in other governments viewing this as a, “license to the United States to attack countries such as North Korea or Iran” (Hass, 2017 pg. 4). This would help reducing the terrorist groups which work at a domestic and individual level. NATO and The UN work at a global level, these organizations could be more